Congressman Resigns

Outsiderzedge

Avenger
Joined
Jan 29, 2003
Messages
11,553
Reaction score
0
Points
31
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/09/29/D8KENKI00.html

Another Republican closet case.

"letters to a male page"

haha

I've always thought it was funny that the libbys use homosexuality against those that are opposed to them. It shows what they really think of gays - they praise the ones that bow down to them. The ones with opposing views they jeer at and call names. Achtung Juden! lol
 
Outsiderzedge said:
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/09/29/D8KENKI00.html

Another Republican closet case.

"letters to a male page"

haha

I've always thought it was funny that the libbys use homosexuality against those that are opposed to them. It shows what they really think of gays - they praise the ones that bow down to them. The ones with opposing views they jeer at and call names. Achtung Juden! lol
I think the problem raised was not because of the presumed homosexuality, but the fact that the page was 16 at the thime. That's pedophilia.
 
Outsiderzedge said:
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/09/29/D8KENKI00.html

Another Republican closet case.

"letters to a male page"

haha

I've always thought it was funny that the libbys use homosexuality against those that are opposed to them. It shows what they really think of gays - they praise the ones that bow down to them. The ones with opposing views they jeer at and call names. Achtung Juden! lol



*Jewish guy takes offense*
 
honestly the email seems innocent enough but oh well
 
the emails seem kinda shady. i can see him meaning it al innocently....but i can also see it being the beginning of something perverse.
 
maxwell's demon said:
whoah wheres wilhelm?

Wilhelm has an alibi.

He's not a congressman or a congressman's aide.
 
War Lord said:
Wilhelm has an alibi.

He's not a congressman or a congressman's aide.

not what i menat *****e:down

and outsiderz, you also are *****e:up:



:yay: :heart:
 
maxwell's demon said:
not what i menat *****e:down

and outsiderz, you also are *****e:up:



:yay: :heart:

How am I supposed to know what you mean if you don't explain yourself.
 
another one bites the dust...lol
 
im begining to think all politicians have mental problems... not just liberals.
 
Fred_Fury said:
im begining to think all politicians have mental problems... not just liberals.

Okay, group, I feeel we've made a lot of progress here today. :)

jag
 
Fred_Fury said:
im begining to think all politicians have mental problems... not just liberals.

Same...except I always knew both of them need to be chucked into an Asylum. :o
 
This was a nice read about Scandals of Republicans and Democrats.


Sex scandals involving politicians are as old as Thomas Jefferson, but the outcome seems to depend on which party you represent. In recent years, for the most part, Democrats have been able to survive their sordid escapades while Republicans have paid with their political lives.

The latest example: Mark Foley, a Republican congressman from Florida, who abruptly became an ex-congressman from Florida last week amid revelations that he had sent sexually explicit e-mails to teenage boys who were serving as House pages.


Tuesday, Oct. 3, 1 p.m. ET
Station Break
Washington Post staff writer Paul Farhi takes your questions, comments, rants and reviews on the best and worst pop culture has to offer.


Save & Share
Tag This Article


Saving options
1. Save to description:
Headline (required)
Subheadline
Byline

2. Save to notes (255 character max):
Subheadline Blurb None
3. Tag This Article

Foley's creepy behavior might have done him in even if he'd been the most liberal of Democrats. But that's not assured. With a Republican at the center of the seamy scandal, however, it was almost a slam-dunk that Foley would have to quit.

That's how it usually turns out for members of the conservative, traditional-family-values party. Just ask Bob Livingston, Jack Ryan, Bob Packwood, Dan Crane or others in the GOP who've watched their careers go pffft! with salacious disclosures. Or ask Bill Clinton, Gerry Studds, Barney Frank and other Democrats who've withstood embarrassing revelations to govern another day. Consider, for example:


· Packwood, from Oregon, resigned his Senate seat in 1995 amid repeated allegations that he had sexually harassed women. A few years earlier, Rep. Jim Bates, a Democrat from the San Diego area, faced similar allegations by two female staffers. Bates refused to resign and won reelection (he eventually lost his seat to Randy "Duke" Cunningham, who ran into his own ethics problems last year, and resigned after being convicted of bribery).


· In 1998, Livingston won the Republican Party's blessing to succeed Newt Gingrich as speaker of the House. But Livingston, of Louisiana, never served a day in the job. He was sunk by revelations that he'd had an extramarital affair, a disclosure that carried the additional baggage of hypocrisy since, at the time, Livingston was leading the Republican impeachment of President Clinton for his affair with Monica Lewinsky. Clinton, of course, ultimately survived impeachment.


· Rep. Thomas Evans (R-Del.) was voted out of office in 1982 after he publicly regretted his "association" with a lobbyist named Paula Parkinson, who later posed for Playboy; Evans and two other Republican House members (including one named Dan Quayle) had shared a Florida cottage with Parkinson on a junket. Contrast this to the reaction to allegations of an affair between Sen. Chuck Robb (D-Va.) and Tai Collins, a former Miss Virginia. Robb claimed that Collins had only given him a back rub in a hotel room. Robb won reelection three years later.


· The clearest illustration may be in the divergent outcomes of the cases against Crane (R) and Studds (D) in 1983. Both men were censured by the House for having sex with underage congressional pages -- Crane with a 17-year-old girl in 1980, Studds with a 17-year-old boy in 1973. Crane, of Illinois, apologized for his actions, while Studds, who declared he was gay, refused. Crane lost his reelection bid the next year; Studds, of Massachusetts, kept winning his seat until he retired in 1996.
 
Wow, its like Christmas. First Delay, then this guy and I'll tell you what, they're going to get Hastert because of this **** too.
 
Outsiderzedge said:
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/09/29/D8KENKI00.html

Another Republican closet case.

"letters to a male page"

haha

I've always thought it was funny that the libbys use homosexuality against those that are opposed to them. It shows what they really think of gays - they praise the ones that bow down to them. The ones with opposing views they jeer at and call names. Achtung Juden! lol
Well in this case I think the jeering has everything to do with the 16 year old. However, your claim is still perposterous. Democrats (or as you misnamed them "libbys") use these stories because they directly conflict with the typical Republican voter, not because they hate gays.

Thirdly, in this case the media exposed him. Not a political party.
 
when you were making your dormroom smell like sex with that not-your-girlfriend-chick.
 
The Washington Times wants Hastert to resign over this:

http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/news_theswamp/2006/10/resign_speaker__1.html

Resign, Mr. Speaker

TODAY'S EDITORIAL
October 3, 2006

The facts of the disgrace of Mark Foley, who was a Republican member of the House from a Florida district until he resigned last week, constitute a disgrace for every Republican member of Congress. Red flags emerged in late 2005, perhaps even earlier, in suggestive and wholly inappropriate e-mail messages to underage congressional pages. His aberrant, predatory -- and possibly criminal -- behavior was an open secret among the pages who were his prey. The evidence was strong enough long enough ago that the speaker should have relieved Mr. Foley of his committee responsibilities contingent on a full investigation to learn what had taken place, whether any laws had been violated and what action, up to and including prosecution, were warranted by the facts. This never happened.
...
House Speaker Dennis Hastert must do the only right thing, and resign his speakership at once. Either he was grossly negligent for not taking the red flags fully into account and ordering a swift investigation, for not even remembering the order of events leading up to last week's revelations -- or he deliberately looked the other way in hopes that a brewing scandal would simply blow away. He gave phony answers Friday to the old and ever-relevant questions of what did he know and when did he know it? Mr. Hastert has forfeited the confidence of the public and his party, and he cannot preside over the necessary coming investigation, an investigation that must examine his own inept performance.

...
 
People love to judge, but till you've actually had to sit there surrounded by those luscious, nubile pages all day long....who among us could really resist?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"