*spits out drink*
Are you sure they didn't take this survey in Alabama?
Oh, I've stopped caring. The fact that virtually all biologists believe in evolution tells me that the people who actually know what the hell they're talking about support the idea, and they're the ones who will ultimately make the scientific decisions and create the applications.
I no longer care that some hick in East Jesus, Alabama doesn't believe in evolution. That is, until they start *****ing that creationism should be taught as science. Then they need a good old scientific smack-down.
As for the thread topic, Darwin was....interesting. He got a lot wrong, though the basic principles of Darwinian evolution hold up under today's scientific scrutiny. I also can't blame him for getting so much wrong, because there was a lot that nobody knew back then. Nobody knew about DNA as a mode of inheritance. In fact, for a long time (long after Darwin, in the early 1900's) scientists thought proteins were the primary method for the passing of inherited traits.
As other people have stated, if he didn't put the pieces together, somebody else probably would have. It was only a matter of time.
So, basically...I don't really know what I think about Darwin. Very smart guy, and I have a healthy respect for him and his models, but the semi-worship of Darwin makes me feel a bit awkward because, well...he wasn't quite that awesome.