You watched this movie more than ones and still didn't see the hints that Eli was blind through out the whole movie?
![]()
he certainly went blind at the end of the movie, that I will not argue. But as for being blind the rest of the movie, I disagree... it was more like he was blind, then cured by god, before the movie. I've rewatched 3 times now, and still don't see it.
I would have been impressed on rewatch, if it were that he was literally blind the whole movie (and it was recognizable on second view). But it just doesn't feel that way on first, or on rewatch. It would have been amazing if it had been made more clear that he was totally blind... without the audience realizing. But three times I've watched this, twice looking specifically from your perspective, and I still don't see it.
There are no scenes in the movie that imply he is blind (other than the last couple)... but there are also no scenes implying that he can see. Not implying that he can see, does not mean that he cannot see. I see no quotable proof from the movie that defines denzel as blind... prior the close up of his eyes at the end. I call that a denouement for denouement's sake.
exactly. See for me, the suprise is sold when I go and re-watch, and it turns out he is litterally blind for the WHOLE movie (not just instances where it is intentionally illustrated that he is blind). Every moment of the film should be an exposition of his blindness. But this exposition of blindness should have been invisible to the first time viewer, but absolutely clear to the repeat viewer.
But alas, it feels like they took a movie that is primarily about a guy who could see, then sprinkled in the proof in little easter eggs to illustrate the lack of sight... instead of trying to achieve this secretly throughout every single scene with Denzel.
The religion issue is a problem, and shouldn't have been hammered home so hard: why protestant christianity?
lastly: upon a couple of rewatches: the first 40 minutes of this movie were annoyingly stolen from my all time favority post-apocolipse movie, The Road Warrior. Identical film, up to the town. They almost use the exact same camera angles.
That is correct, he had faith. As goes with the theme, as long as you have faith, something that drives you, you can do anything, no matter what circumstance or abilities you have.
That's what Carnegie didn't realize. In fact he is the one who is blind. He is blind of what real faith is. It's not just in a physical form. I loved the inclusion of his blind wife saying "you must have no idea how it feels to have something so close but something that's a thousand miles away" or something like that. Carnegie believed that faith comes from a book, hence his wanting to manipulate everyone with it.
I have a feeling in years to come, people will appreciate this film more. It certainly has depth that critics have neglected.
I think that the old couple's place clarifies his[BLACKOUT]He said that he didn't see the sign, and he touched the door with his shotgun instead of just grabbing the door knob.[/BLACKOUT] There were other clues that have already been pointed out so well by Jamon, T'Jai, and others, but I think that is the most clear cut sign.blindness.
I was thinking that Eli touched the old folks door with his shotgun to see if it was booby-trapped.
I don't know. Cristics are funny at times. Usually they have a great eye for films, but sometimes they're mistaken when a film is first released. Films like this and Blade Runner and Fight Club were misunderstood too. I mean this film has flaws, but I don't think it deserves a rotten rating on RT. It's better than that.