CelticPredator
Superhero
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2008
- Messages
- 9,155
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
I blame....
THE GREYS.
THE GREYS.
My mom actually believed that. I just stared at her for about 2 minutes and just walked away.Seagulls **** taking out the oxygen from the water apparently.
Thats the official word from a government funded biologist. So in other words a pretty trustworthy answer.
Nothing to worry about everything is ok in this planet of ours. Not.
People won't care until we hear: Millions of people drop dead.
Then they start panicking. Too little too late at that point.
Must have been a lot of seagulls with diarrhea.Just those New years fireworks nothing to worry about.
The biologist in that article blamed it on seagull droppings removing the oxygen causing a billion fish to die. Are you ****ing kidding me?
THANK YOU.It's possible that the droppings may have been a factor, but here's the thing: people would be on his ass just as much (if not more) if he merely said "I don't know". People expect scientists to have answers when they pretty much almost never do.
At any rate, none of this is a sign of anything other than people paying more attention to it. Animals die a lot, and that's part of a healthy ecosystem.
Must have been a lot of seagulls with diarrhea.
It's possible that the droppings may have been a factor, but here's the thing: people would be on his ass just as much (if not more) if he merely said "I don't know". People expect scientists to have answers when they pretty much almost never do.
At any rate, none of this is a sign of anything other than people paying more attention to it. Animals die a lot, and that's part of a healthy ecosystem.
Earth's creatures are on the brink of a sixth mass extinction, comparable to the one that wiped out the dinosaurs. That's the conclusion of a new study, which calculates that three-quarters of today's animal species could vanish within 300 years.
"This is really gloom-and-doom stuff," says the study's lead author, paleobiologist Anthony Barnosky of the University of California at Berkeley. "But the good news is, we haven't come so far down the road that it's inevitable."
Species naturally come and go over long periods of time. But what sets a mass extinction apart is that three-quarters of all species vanish quickly. Earth has already endured five such events, including one that wiped out dinosaurs and many other creatures 65 million years ago. Conservationists have warned for years that the world is in the midst of a sixth, human-caused extinction, with species from frogs to birds to tigers threatened by climate change, disease, loss of habitat and competition for resources with nonnative species.
- The Washington Post
THANK YOU.
It happened once, it got reported on and the media does it usual swarm to cover it every other time it happens. Once the media finds out about something they always cling onto it, whether it be children getting kidnapped, gay suicide, or mass animal deaths.
This isn't a sign of impending apocalypse at all people.
I love it. Humans we are the perfect invincible force of do good!
I'm not somehow abject to all scientist. Its just that the one biologist who did the analyzing of the Redondo situation gave an asinine reason. I live by a marina with breakwater, its been damaged severely before and we didn't have billions of fish die on our shores.
So obviously its some other reason. I would have preferred a "I don't know" honestly. Would have been more of an honest response anyway.
As for not worrying when it comes to mass animal deaths. Well there is a reason for concern and humans are directly tied to it. I hope people still understand that cause and effect is still a great part of existence period, thinking that it somehow doesn't apply to us is really fascinating to me.
Mass extinctions will always be a part of Earth and thats just the way it is. Its happened five times before and luckily the planet has us to bring it quicker than those silly dinosaurs ever could. Nice try T-Rex.
Not to be an ******* but those don't really matter in the grand scheme of things. The last one is far more important while the others is strictly sensationalizing human actions that have happened since the dawn of man.
Thats not to say that massive animal deaths haven't happen before because they have. Its the rate at which its happening which is the alarming part, not that fact that it happens as thats to be expected. Comprende?