Goodbye, Triceratops.

Spider-Who?

ERMERGERD!
Joined
Dec 5, 2001
Messages
11,346
Reaction score
14
Points
58
I think this kind of thing has happened before - not only among extinct creatures, but also among extant ones.
 
One man begs to differ






billycranston.jpg
 
The answer is simple. Say goodbye to Torosaurus, and say that it was just a mature Triceratops. Of course, that'll never happen, because nomenclature in science tends to be nerd-centric, particularly where it doesn't really matter. See the Apatosaurus/Brontosaurus issue (though granted, that actually supports my Triceratops over Torosaurus, since Triceratops was named and discovered first).
 
Triceratops sounds cooler. So I'll go with that.

Try Sarah's Tops :)
 
Three Horned Face >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>. Perforated Lizard
 
The answer is simple. Say goodbye to Torosaurus, and say that it was just a mature Triceratops. Of course, that'll never happen, because nomenclature in science tends to be nerd-centric, particularly where it doesn't really matter. See the Apatosaurus/Brontosaurus issue (though granted, that actually supports my Triceratops over Torosaurus, since Triceratops was named and discovered first).

The difference here is that the dinosaur called a "Brontosaurus" was not a complete skeleton of that species, which turned out to be an Apatosaurus.
 
And, from what I know, Apatosaurus was classified first, therefore that name got precedence (although Brontosaurus is much more widely used, sounds better and is generally looked down upon due to its prominence in the layperson community).
 
After reading this I have an unsightly urge to time travel back to 1993.

Jurassic Park AND MMPR debuted that year. :up:
 
The Blue Ranger had the coolest helmet, but the Sabretooth Tiger was the better Zord.
 
Agreed. It was the only one that looked like it could do anything on it's own.
 
There were only four dinosaurs that the world cared about: T-Rex, Pterodactyls, Raptors, and the Triceratops...

We lost one guys... :( We lost one..
 
for all us dino nuts out there...

http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=are-torosaurus-and-triceratops-one-2009-09-28

the article pretty much says that they believe that the triceratops was actually a young torosaurus (or the torosaurus is a mature triceratops...take your pick).

So, with this in mind, what other dinosaurs do you think are actually the same species, just at different growth stages/genders?

I'm glad they fixed this anomaly. This isn't the first dinosaur which got an upgrade. A year or two ago a new report showed that varying species of Pacycephalosaurus fossils discovered, where in fact, just different stages of development of the mature variety.

Mature Skull

738pxpachycephalosaurus.jpg



Read more about it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pachycephalosaurus
 
Last edited:
I'm glad they fixed this anomaly. This isn't the first dinosaur which got an upgrade. A year or two ago a new report showed that varying species of Pacycephalosaurus fossils discovered, where in fact, just different stages of development of the mature variety.

yeah, I've heard about that one, too. I'd really like to see how much further paleontology will go and how our understanding will evolve over the next several decades. I wouldn't be surprised if we see the number of different dinosaur species steadily dwindle as they continue to realize many of them are actually just various stages of maturity.

On a side note, from what i've read else where, the fossils will continue to be called Triceratops, since that name was coined prior to Torosaurus, like Ferret mentioned.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,140
Messages
21,906,570
Members
45,703
Latest member
Weird
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"