Group of preachers claim planned parenthood are racists!

Memphis Slim

Superhero
Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Messages
6,996
Reaction score
0
Points
31
Pastors Accuse Planned Parenthood for 'Genocide' on Blacks

Thursday, April 24, 2008
By Kelley Beaucar Vlahos


WASHINGTON — The Planned Parenthood Federation of America has perpetuated a “genocide on the black community,” says a group of African-American pastors who claimed Thursday the birth control and abortion provider has had a racist agenda since its beginnings in 1921.
Holding a brief vigil and press conference in front of a Planned Parenthood clinic in Washington, D.C., the group of pastors and activists said they were incensed by the results of recent “undercover” inquiries into several Planned Parenthood clinics across the country.

“Every day … over 1,500 black babies are murdered inside the black woman’s womb,” said Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, of Brotherhood Organization of a New Destiny (BOND). “This is a race issue.”

The pastors urged Congress to initiate an audit of the organization and have written letters demanding that money for Planned Parenthood be eliminated from federal Title X funding, of which the group got $65 million for fiscal year 2007, according to pro-life Concerned Women of America. In total, Planned Parenthood received $300 million in government contracts and grants in the current fiscal year.
The national office of Planned Parenthood provided FOX News with a lengthy statement on Thursday in which it said its role in the African-American community is widespread because the need is greater.

“The (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) revealed that a shocking number of teenage African-American girls — nearly half — carry a sexually transmitted infection," reads the statement. "This compares to an overall average rate for all teenage girls of at least one in four.
“The largest increases in the teen birthrate were reported for non-Hispanic black teens, whose overall rate rose five percent in 2006. In addition, African-American women are more likely to die of breast cancer than the general population,” it said.

But an investigation, undertaken by students at the University of California at Los Angeles newspaper, The Advocate, revealed troubling responses from Planned Parenthood staffers when asked by an actor, posing as a “donor,” if he could earmark his contribution for abortions for “black babies” only.

In one example, Autumn Kersey, vice president for marketing at Planned Parenthood of Idaho, is asked whether a donation can be specified “to help a minority group … like the black community, for example.”
“Certainly,” Kersey says in a taped response in which she sounds genuinely encouraged by the offer. “If you wanted to designate that your gift be used to help an African-American woman in need, then we would certainly make sure the gift as earmarked for that purpose.”
The caller responds: “Great, because I really faced trouble with affirmative action, and I don’t want my kids to be disadvantaged against black kids. I just had a baby; I want to put it in his name.”
Kersey responds, “Absolutely

The "donor" proceeds to proclaim that “the less black kids out there the better,” followed by, “understandable, understandable,” by Kersey, who laughed as if he were joking.

“Excuse my hesitation, this is the first time that I’ve had a donor call and make this kind of request, so I’m excited and want to make sure I don’t leave anything out,” she is recorded saying.

Kersey's and other statements were culled from calls to Planned Parenthood clinics in six states. In each, the staff person answering the call expressed an interest in taking the donations despite the caller’s overtly racist commentary.
That is part of a troubling trend, say critics, who accuse Planned Parenthood of targeting minority neighborhoods. They blame the institution for a disproportionate rate of abortions among black women.
“I think the media, and I think America, and certainly black folks, need to start thinking about race and Planned Parenthood, said Rev. Clenard Childress, who raised the question, not for the first time, about Planned Parenthood’s founder, Margaret Sanger, who died over 40 years ago at the age of 86.
Sanger, a pioneering advocate for universal access to birth control for women, was also a proponent of “eugenics,” a philosophy that advocates social intervention, like birth control and abortion, for "improving" the hereditary traits of the human race. According to biographies written about Sanger, who was the sixth child of 11 eleven born to a rigid Catholic family in upstate New York, her support for this practice was focused on the “unfit” and the poor — slum dwellers — as they were called at the time, by making contraceptives more available there.

Over the years, comments made by Sanger about reproduction among the poor and minorities have led to her reputation as a racist and a belief that she wanted to “weed” out blacks from society. Planned Parenthood has disputed that caricature and has pointed out her supporters in the black community, including Martin Luther King Jr., and W.E.B DuBois.

Nevertheless, Childress and others repeatedly invoked her name as a major force behind a century-long “genocide” on the black community.
According to a report released by the group of Students for Life America on Tuesday, black women are 4.8 times more likely to have an abortion than white women, while the black population in the U.S. is in decline. Black women account for 36 percent of those having abortions in the U.S. today, according to group, while black children make up 17 percent of live births.

“Contrary to the public’s belief that Planned Parenthood is helpful and supportive of family planning and the health of the mother and child, recent news and research show that the roots of its foundation have continued to give birth to continual hatred and disdain for minorities that its founder saw as 'unfit,'” the group says in its report.
In its response, Planned Parenthood emphasized that 97 percent of its services are focused on providing contraceptives, breast and cervical cancer screenings and sexually transmitted disease testing and treatment — not abortions.
“Those services are more important than ever as this country faces a health care crisis — too many women can't afford birth control, too many families don’t have adequate health insurance coverage and too many young people are faced with unintended pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections,” the organization said. “As a safety-net provider, it is Planned Parenthood's mission to provide women, men and teens with affordable access to reproductive health care services and information, regardless of income.”
Meanwhile, Planned Parenthood of Idaho apologized in February for the comments made by its staff during the UCLA student investigation.
“A fundraising employee violated the organization’s principles and practices when she appeared to be willing to accept a racially motivated donation,” said the Idaho-based organization told the Idaho Statesman. “We apologize for the manner in which this offensive call was handled. We take full responsibility for the actions of the fundraising staff member who created the impression that racism of any form would be tolerated at Planned Parenthood. We took swift action to ensure that each of our employees understands their responsibility to communicate clearly with donors about the fact that we believe in helping all individuals, regardless of gender, race or sexual orientation, make informed decisions about their reproductive health care.”

That's not enough for Lilly Epps, an activist who joined the pastors in denouncing Planned Parenthood on Thursday. She said she was 26 years old when she got an abortion in the clinic used to stage the protest. She said the day has come to get “the truth” out about Planned Parenthood and what it is doing her community.

“I am a mad black woman,” she said. “Words cannot say how angry I am, how ignorant I was. But I thank God I came to the truth.”

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Eygv8qEkiFE


I'M JUST GLAD THIS HAS COME TO LIGHT.
 
Because it's much easier to protest a group rather than encourage school age children not to f*** or use condoms if they're going to :dry:
 
Oh lord. This isn't exposing anything. This is the opinion of a group of people. Exposing implies there are documents or testimony proving it. This article lacks any form of proof.
 
And the "article" also lacks the website it was copied from, so again celldog is plagiarizing
 
The pro-abortion movement in this country is disgusting.

I'm impartial on it, to be honest. While I do think there is no way the argument can be made to support partial birth abortion, I'm not comofrtable with the government outlawing abortion. Slippery slope argument, and all. Plus if they actually did, there would simply be underground clinics, crime rates would rise, people would get hurt, it would be the new weed.

Furthermore, to vote on abortion is ridiculous being as, y'know, the Republicans aren't going to do anything about it because they like dangling it over voters heads and the Democrats aren't going to do anything about it because they're Democrats.
 
I don't know see how this can be considered genocide considering all of these women choose to abort their pregnancies.
 
I'm impartial on it, to be honest. While I do think there is no way the argument can be made to support partial birth abortion, I'm not comofrtable with the government outlawing abortion. Slippery slope argument, and all. Plus if they actually did, there would simply be underground clinics, crime rates would rise, people would get hurt, it would be the new weed.

Furthermore, to vote on abortion is ridiculous being as, y'know, the Republicans aren't going to do anything about it because they like dangling it over voters heads and the Democrats aren't going to do anything about it because they're Democrats.

An episode of "The Simpsons" describes the abortion situation in the United States pretty well. It's when Kang and Kodos take over the bodies of Bob Dole and Bill Clinton. During a rally, the one who overtakes Dole's body gives a speech on the issue, and the audience responds accordingly:

DOLE: Abortions for all!
AUDIENCE: Boo!
DOLE: All right... Abortions for no one!
AUDIENCE: Boo!
DOLE: Abortions for some... and American flags for all!
AUDIENCE: Yay!

Most Americans are in the middle when it comes to abortion. While I believe the practice needs to be regulated and parental consent should be required for those under eighteen, I believe only the woman who has been impregnated should have the ultimate say in the issue. Some Bible-thumping middle-aged white male from Oklahoma shouldn't get to decide which personal decisions a woman on the other side of the country gets to make, especially when they fall within the law.
 
Most Americans are in the middle when it comes to abortion.[/jmanspice]

Just because most Americans are in the middle doesn't make it appropriate public policy or constitutional law. Where were most Americans on Brown v Board in 50s...

While I believe the practice needs to be regulated and parental consent should be required for those under eighteen, I believe only the woman who has been impregnated should have the ultimate say in the issue. Some Bible-thumping middle-aged white male from Oklahoma shouldn't get to decide which personal decisions a woman on the other side of the country gets to make, especially when they fall within the law.

Hmmm, nice ironic stereotype. I find it interesting how the pro-life movement is always characterized as forcing their will on everyone, wheras the status quo is nearly the exact opposite. The only law is that abortions in first two trimesters are constitutional rights everywhere according to Roe v Wade. A group of Supreme Court Justices under the banner of the pro-abortion movement decided that abortion-on-demand must be legal in every part of this country no matter what that Oklahoman, Alabaman, Georgian, or Californian men think...... and because these abortions are a constitutional right,..they can be funded by all our tax payer dollars and would probably be covered in universal healthcare since its a "necessary" medical procedure. If Roe v Wade was overturned, the decision of abortions would be left to state legislatures, it would not immediately ban abortion everywhere. It would move the abortion issue to the legislative branch, where it belongs, not in the judicial branch. So Oklahoma can ban it if majority of that state wanted to and New York can keep it if they wanted to.
 
I don't know see how this can be considered genocide considering all of these women choose to abort their pregnancies.

I wouldn't go and use that term, but the ones being aborted didn't really get a say in the matter, which is usually the case in genocide.
 
I wouldn't go and use that term, but the ones being aborted didn't really get a say in the matter, which is usually the case in genocide.

Well they have to able to think for themselves in order to have a say, correct?
 
all I see is more religous nuts complaining about stuff again, why is this news?
 
That source is to the abortion argument as 9/11 Truth is to the September 11 attacks. I thought you knew better than to subject yourself to wacky bull **** conspiracy theories.


What's your basis on for thinking it's conspiracy??
 
^ wild claims based on debatable evidence, for one.
 
Hmmm, nice ironic stereotype. I find it interesting how the pro-life movement is always characterized as forcing their will on everyone, wheras the status quo is nearly the exact opposite.

Well, maybe that's also because the pro-life groups usually act like that whenever they're protesting it. When I was 16 a group walked up to my mom and me as we were entering a medical complex, pointed at me and asked my mom "Are you taking her for an abortion??" We were going to the eye doctor.

It's the only time in my life I've ever seen my mother close to slugging someone. Later she said she didn't mind that they were protesting, but she was livid that they stepped into our business like that. "What if I was?" she kept saying.

I don't hate the pro-life movement...I think their voice is as important as the pro-choice side. But I don't agree with a lot of their tactics.
 
What's your basis on for thinking it's conspiracy??

First of all, it isn't a factual piece of writing. The majority of the footnoted sources are opinion pieces or background information from anti-abortion groups. Moreover, the majority of quotes which were used by those affiliated with planned parenthood are open-ended and have been skewed to favor the opinion of the person writing this piece. Next, anyone who claims that abortion is a tool used in a plot to destroy the African American race has to be a conspiracy theorist considering women who get abortions make a conscientious decision to terminate their pregnancies. No one is forcing them to get an abortion. Abortion clinics don't take to the streets and force pregnant African American women to kill their unborn children. The decision to end one's pregnancy comes down to a conscientious choice made by one person and one person alone. Not a pro-choice organization, not the Supreme Court... it comes down to the choice of no one but the mother herself.
 
I'm really surprised that pro-life people are so against birth control. More birth control, less unwanted pregnancies, hence less abortions.
 
I'm really surprised that pro-life people are so against birth control. More birth control, less unwanted pregnancies, hence less abortions.

As am I. These people condemn abortion but throw a fit if someone mentions offering condoms in schools or teaching something other than abstinence. It is at best ridiculously naive and at worst just flat out stupidity.
 
Because a Youtube video is such a credible, accurate, unbiased source...

You know, because YouTube videos don't misconstrue the words or phrases of the organizations their makers are trying to protest, nor do they use vague phone calls in an effort distort the credibility of that organization. :whatever:

And, I just want to point out two things which really caught my eye about that four and a half minute musical montage of garbage:

1) The phone call which opened the video... I've worked for politicians who have a certain set of views. Regardless of those views, when someone calls the office, we are solely responsible for taking down their comments and acting as if we agree with the person on the other end. Someone may call into my office and say "Hillary Clinton is working with Ahmadinejad to nuke New York City," but my only reaction should be "okay, I'll pass your comments along." So, when someone calls planned parenthood and says "I want to donate money to your organization because I definitely think we should get rid of black people," it doesn't surprise me that the reaction of the woman on the other end is "well, we'll take the money for whatever reason."

2) The repeated use of the phrase "one person at a time," indicating to the uneducated person that Planned Parenthood advocates killing one "person" at a time. No, that's not overly biased one bit.

So yeah... that's some real classy, credible stuff right there...
 
I'm really surprised that pro-life people are so against birth control. More birth control, less unwanted pregnancies, hence less abortions.

I'm surprised many pro-lifers want these women to have the children in the first place. After all, the majority of them are very religious, and many of those religious folks believe that the child is instantly damned to hell because he or she was born out of wedlock. Not to mention the fact that they think the mother will go to hell for giving birth to a bastard child. Since the Lord views all sin the same, then if the mother aborts her pregnancy, isn't that the same as giving birth to that child, in the eyes of the almighty Lord? (and actually, shouldn't it really be beneficial to some of those Christians, as the unborn child itself would be yet another sin roaming this earth?) :huh:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"