• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

CHiPS - Michael Pena and Dax Shepard are Ponch and Jon

You literally just complained about how the tone is different
Okay, to me, it just looks to have same concepts, aesthetic, feel, approach. In all fairness I really liked S&H, but I watched & liked the original programme first time round as I did Chips but something puts me right off this film version, oh that's it,it's tone is completely different to the original.
 
I was referring to the fact that effectively you are suggesting I should 'get over myself' and buy into films that crush virtually of the original standing of a programme for the sake of some cheap 'anti gay', 'oh look straight man scared of other male contact' jokes.
 
That's a monumental leap. Like wow.

I never said or even implied that you have to like what you're seeing I even said this doesn't look that good. I said/implied that complaint about the tonal switch for these corny shows like Chips, Baywatch, etc. is stupid. You were never going to get a straight tonal remake that modern audiences would buy into
 
That's a monumental leap. Like wow.

I never said or even implied that you have to like what you're seeing I even said this doesn't look that good. I said/implied that complaint about the tonal switch for these corny shows like Chips, Baywatch, etc. is stupid. You were never going to get a straight tonal remake that modern audiences would buy into

You were referring to 'tone' - the tone they are presenting is 'college frat boy BS', that's not a monumental leap.

Fans of original programnmes whose wish for a direct translation is not 'stupid'.
 
Erik Estrada 1977 said:
"We took over the old 8 p.m. family hour. 'Fabulous World of Disney' was on just before us and it was a family hour show. That's why we never drew our guns. It wasn't about bang, bang, shoot 'em up. It was about helping the pedestrians, people in trouble, the young kids who are straying.
It was about officer-public friendships and mentoring."- Eric Estrada

The original "tone" (see above) of this franchise was likely never going to sell today, they had to update it for a movie.
Going to serious, dark, edgy etc... would have been lambasted too, but the embarrassing man-child humor is just as bad.
As usual with many of these updates, if the new "creators" (term used loosely) don't like the original tone and characters, you wonder why are they updating it?
 
Last edited:
The original "tone" of this franchise was likely never going to sell today, they had to update it for a movie.
Going to serious, dark, edgy etc... would have been lambasted too, but the embarrassing man-child humor is just as bad.
As usual with many of these updates, if the new "creators" (term used loosely) don't like the original tone and characters, you wonder why are they updating it?

And because, like I said, this isn't going the Jump Street meta route, the humor they're coming up with comes off as the generic form of raunchy slapstick humor we've seen many times before instead of humor that relates to the show in question.
 
LOL, yeah, I'm not looking for an argument, not sure why you quoted me.^:funny:
This movie isn't worth anyone's time, and picking on it is to easy.
I didn't even know it was being made until this thread showed up on page one.

The OP of this thread it seems at least spent more time (that is next to none) thinking about getting it right, than the creators of the film did, as he at least bothered to use the correct lower case "i" in the title.:woot:
 
Last edited:
LOL, yeah, I'm not looking for an argument, not sure why you quoted me.^:funny:
This movie isn't worth anyone's time, and picking on it is to easy.
I didn't even know it was being made until this thread showed up on page one.

The OP of this thread it seems at least spent more time (that is next to none) thinking about getting it right, than the creators of the film did, as he at least bothered to use the correct lower case "i" in the title.:woot:

I wasn't arguing. I was adding to your point of embarrassing man-child humor.
 
Just saw the trailer. It looks pretty bad. I won't be watching this.

Is Ponch not even really Ponch but just someone using that as a cover identity?

And Ponch was meant to be the less serious one in the original. He was the less experienced one who trained under Jon, who was more of the boy scout and blander one.
 
I saw the trailer attached to Kong last night and this looks as bad as they come. I have a feeling this one won't be doing that well.
 
My biggest takeaway from the new red band trailer was that the Black kid from old Disney Channel show, "The Jersey" is in it.
 
And we still in a world in which The Jetsons still doesn't have a live action adaptation. It's nuts.
 
Another waste of time and money.

Chris Pines dad Robert Pine was good on the show.
 
And we still in a world in which The Jetsons still doesn't have a live action adaptation. It's nuts.

They're making a Hanana-Barbera Shared Universe starting with Scooby Doo next year but i think it'll be 3D. Funny thing is that Dax is directing/writing it like with CHIPS
 
But that's not entirely true when studios are willing to spend money on crap like Gods of Egypt, etc.
 
Those types of movies for better or worse are consider epics. They are action adventure that should have spectacle. Jetsons would be a comedy. But to do it right, you'd probably need a lot of CGI because it's the future. And you don't spend $100M on a comedy adaptation of cartoon show.
 
I guess that time goes by in the 90's that it's too late for it. Like how studios are so hesitant with He-Man, I guess. It's high concept but you need to front the money.
 
Another waste of time and money.

Chris Pines dad Robert Pine was good on the show.

Wow, I never realised that was Chris Pine's dad. I used to watch this show first time around. Don't think I'll be watching a remake.
 
They had no problem making big budget adaptations of cartoons in the 90s, yeah. Sure it looked weird but they did it.
 
I really hate all the gay panic jokes in the damn trailers. Really seems like they're just in the to make those who don't like homosexuals feel uncomfortable. And this is coming from someone like me who's not prejudiced like that against gay people!
 
The problem with this and the Baywatch movie is that they look like they're trying to be the next 21 Jump Street, but without the right creative spark to back it up.
And... I just don't find Dax Shepard funny.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"