• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Harry Potter & The Half Blood Prince

What did you think of the movie?

  • 10 - Great!

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5 - Not so great.

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1 - Poor


Results are only viewable after voting.
I haven't read any bad reviews yet?? :huh:

I finished it this morning, and the epilogue worked. It's kind of anti-climatic compared to the utter epic scale of the chapters before it (I think it's the first book I've ever been out of breath reading), but the very last line settles the story very nicely. It's what they fought for.

I think HBP will be very important to how DH works as a film. So much of book 7 depends on the character of Dumbledore that the scenes between him and Harry in HBP are crucial to get right so it can go right into the story of DH.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_potter_and_the_deadly_hallows#Critical_Reception
 
It sold 8.9 million copies or something like that in its first 24 hours so I would say that is quiet impressive.

That is talking about everyone being pissed about people giving early reviews with spoilers in them before the book even came out. It wasn't a negative review about the book...it was how fans took to the early spoiler heavy critics thoughts. I haven't heard a bad thing about this book so far...
 
The epilogue wasn't that good. I remember reading that JKR wrote it before any of the books were published.
 
I haven't read anything about HBP in plot summary to stay shocked, when I'll discover what does it mean during reading Book 7. Still, I am very worried about negative reviews coming out :(

I'm glad I always listen to critics:dry:
 
I haven't read the last book yet (it will be released here in Russia only in Fall), but after checking out plot summary I found the idea of "19 years later" weak and the reason why it got negative reviews so far :(

Where is it getting bad reviews at?

The epilogue wasn't that good. I remember reading that JKR wrote it before any of the books were published.

I've heard that too, and it does show. Read through books 1 through seven, heck, just read book 1 or 2 followed by book 3. You can see Prisoner of Azkaban is really when Rowling came into her own as a writer. Books 1 and 2 she is working out the kinks, but by book 4 she has established herself as one of the best writers today.
 
Oh, and a bit off topic, but is it me or would Michael Gambon have been far better for Aberforth Dumbledore? I was watching GOF on HBO today and his rough, rugged nature combined with his homely-ish looks remind me so much of how I envisioned Aberforth.
 
Oh, and a bit off topic, but is it me or would Michael Gambon have been far better for Aberforth Dumbledore? I was watching GOF on HBO today and his rough, rugged nature combined with his homely-ish looks remind me so much of how I envisioned Aberforth.

Aberforth rocked in Book 7 :up: and also Neville's grandmother lol
 
Aberforth rocked in Book 7 :up: and also Neville's grandmother lol

Amen to that.

Its funny, Gambon was a horrid choice for Albus Dumbledore. He looks far too gruff, he plays the role far too aggressively. His hair is even a bit too dark. And yet at the same time, he is exactly right for Aberforth.
 
I wouldn't say DH is the best in the series personally. But it's still a good book, I haven't seen any negative reviews. Yeah, people have criticisms but that certainly doesn't mean they're negative reviews.

I wonder what they are going to chop out for the movie really. I hope DH is going to be the Potter that finally hits the elusive 3 hour mark. They should really go out on a bang.

Actually, thinking about it..what's going to be chopped out of Half Blood Prince???
 
I wouldn't say DH is the best in the series personally. But it's still a good book, I haven't seen any negative reviews. Yeah, people have criticisms but that certainly doesn't mean they're negative reviews.

I wonder what they are going to chop out for the movie really. I hope DH is going to be the Potter that finally hits the elusive 3 hour mark. They should really go out on a bang.

Actually, thinking about it..what's going to be chopped out of Half Blood Prince???

Probably the Lupin/Tonks romance. It didn't add much to HBP and didn't add much to DH either. It is one of those things that can be cut without much harm (though won't Warners' faces be red if JK makes a Ted Lupin series and they need to explain that to adapt it?). The quidditch subplot will probably be cut (again). Also, Ginny's dating. Harry will lust after her, but she probably won't be as...not ****ty, but outgoing as she is in the books. Those are all minor though.

The biggest cuts if I had to guess, will be Ron and Hermione's fight and Romilda Vane. Plus I think Slughorn will have a much smaller role and put up much less resistance to giving the memory. And the house elves (again). Knowing the filmmakers Hermione will probably somehow figure out where Draco is going :cwink:
 
DEL TORO TO DIRECT

pan_lab_6.jpg
 
Probably the Lupin/Tonks romance. It didn't add much to HBP and didn't add much to DH either. It is one of those things that can be cut without much harm (though won't Warners' faces be red if JK makes a Ted Lupin series and they need to explain that to adapt it?). The quidditch subplot will probably be cut (again). Also, Ginny's dating. Harry will lust after her, but she probably won't be as...not ****ty, but outgoing as she is in the books. Those are all minor though.

The biggest cuts if I had to guess, will be Ron and Hermione's fight and Romilda Vane. Plus I think Slughorn will have a much smaller role and put up much less resistance to giving the memory. And the house elves (again). Knowing the filmmakers Hermione will probably somehow figure out where Draco is going :cwink:

I would imagine the Lupin/Tonks romance will be cut, I am fine with that really. Quidditch wil be gone aswell. I wonder what they are going to do regarding action type scenes though. There's not exactly a lot of action in HBP and WB will feel they have to inject it in somewhere possibly. Quidditch may do that. Oh and Ginny is kinda ****ty. Well, not ****ty exactly, but she did put herself about a fair bit. I think they are going to keep the Ron/Hermione thing. They are casting for Lavender Brown so they must intend to keep it in, in some fashion anyway.

I reckon they should keep the house elves in. I mean, the house elves do play a part in Deathly Hallows. It'd just give the audience a reminder that they are actually around. Instead of having them just pop up out of nowhere for the last movie. Dobby hasn't been seen in any movie except COS.

One of the things I liked about OOTP was that Ron seemed a lot more like Ron from the books. He stood by Harry when Seamus was having a go and he came up with the idea of getting away from the Inquisitorial Squad. Now that Kloves will be coming back, he'll probably become the comic relief again. And Hermione will be the action herione of the group.
 
Probably the Lupin/Tonks romance. It didn't add much to HBP and didn't add much to DH either. It is one of those things that can be cut without much harm (though won't Warners' faces be red if JK makes a Ted Lupin series and they need to explain that to adapt it?).

it might be mentioned because it shows how a patronus can change depending on your love life:oldrazz:
 
Name of the character who got the reprieve and more on Jo's Harry Potter future. Spoilers for those who haven't read the last book.

from msnbc.com

For the millions in the midst of the seven stages of mourning for the end of the Harry Potter era, take heart.

In her first tell-all interview since the release of “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows,” J.K. Rowling told TODAY’s Meredith Vieira she "probably will" publish a Potter encyclopedia, promising many more details about her beloved characters and the fate of the wizarding world beyond the few clues provided in the seventh book’s epilogue.

“I suppose I have (started) because the raw material is all in my notes,” Rowling said.


Hogwarts, for example, has a new headmaster (“McGonagall was really getting on a bit”), and Rowling said she can see Harry going back to give the "odd talk" on Defense Against the Dark Arts. That class, by the way, is now led by a permanent professor since Voldemort’s death broke the jinx which didn’t allow a teacher to remain in the position for more than a year.

Rowling offered up these details freely to Vieira and the 14 fans who asked her questions at Edinburgh Castle in Scotland on Tuesday. In fact, now that she is now longer burdened with guarding the secrets of book seven, Rowling seemed to delight in discussing her plot choices and clearing up the mysteries that have previously surrounded the books.

The character Rowling couldn’t bear to kill
One of the big stories that has been floating among fans for over a year is that one character gets a reprieve from death, while two others Rowling didn’t intend to kill end up dying in “Deathly Hallows.”

“Mr. Weasley, he was the person who got a reprieve,” Rowling said. “When I sketched out the books, Mr. Weasley was due to die in Book Five.”

Instead, another father in the book dies in the Battle of Hogwarts.

Even though Rowling couldn’t bear to kill off Arthur Weasley, Rowling said every character was extremely difficult for her. Given the blood bath that is “Deathly Hallows,” the writing of it was bound to be an emotional roller coaster.

But nothing in the entire process of the series was more difficult than writing the scene when Harry, accompanied by his deceased lost loved ones – including his parents James and Lily and his godfather Sirius — walks into the forest with the intent of sacrificing his life in the name of defeating Voldemort, Rowling said, adding it is her favorite passage in all seven books.

“I didn't cry as I was writing (that chapter), but when I finished writing, I had enormous explosion of emotion and I cried and cried and cried,” Rowling said.

“That was partly because of the content — and partly because it had been planned for so long and been roughed out for so long. And to write the definitive version felt like a — a huge climax.”

“The Deathly Hallows” is a climax to the last 17 years of Rowling’s life, a time when she has gone from a single divorced mother living on public assistance to a married mother of three and one richest women in the world.

It’s now time to sit back for a bit and enjoy the life that Harry has given her, Rowling said. And, when she’s ready, there’s always that encyclopedia waiting in the wings.

“I’m not going to do it tomorrow because I’d really like a break,” Rowling said, laughing. “So you may be waiting.”
 
The epilogue wasn't that good. I remember reading that JKR wrote it before any of the books were published.

It was different. She originally said the very last word of the very last book would be "scar," which it wasn't, and I read in an interview recently that she had changed it when she finally finished book 7.

The epilogue seems a little flat compared to the chapters before it, but once the whole thing settles in, I thought it was a better epilogue than having Harry running Hogwarts or being the Minister for Magic or something crazy like that.
 
^^

certainly, the chapter where Harry walks to his death was just INCREDIBLE. It was more emotional for me the Snape's remember chapter though.
 
^^

certainly, the chapter where Harry walks to his death was just INCREDIBLE. It was more emotional for me the Snape's remember chapter though.

That was the chapter JK said she couldn't stop crying over after she wrote it. That's going to be an amazing moment in the movie.

I'm curious how everyone involved in the movies must be intensely studying the 7th book now (as well as some actors learning their fates) to make sure everything matches up right in HBP.
 
So I guess the Naomi part of the rumor can be considered fact. I'll be interested to see where Joeseph and Stuart will fit into the film.
 
I haven't read the last book yet (it will be released here in Russia only in Fall), but after checking out plot summary I found the idea of "19 years later" weak and the reason why it got negative reviews so far :(

Book isnt really getting negative reviews..dont think ive read a negative review yet.
 
So I guess the Naomi part of the rumor can be considered fact. I'll be interested to see where Joeseph and Stuart will fit into the film.


I'm sure Joseph will portray the young Voldemort and Stuart, Bill Weasley.
 
So it seems like Bill is going to be in it. Is Fleur? I mean, if she is how are they going to explain how they met?
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"