Yeah, it was a pretty simple search to turn it up.
I don't see how this ***** is complaining about her privacy being violated when she screwed somebody in public.![]()
I can't believe a court ordered that. People upload random crap all the time and often under pseudonyms. Why should she get some special protection and have YouTube face a potential $119,000 daily fine? I could understand better if someone spied a camera into her home or something, but this heifer was at a public beach, knowing she's a celebrity and she's surprised this got out?I have no idea how she actually got a court to favor her, I can´t see how violation of privacy applies to someone doing private behavior in a public place, she could be sued for acting like that, IMO.
You don't see any genitals but there's plenty of humping and thrusting. Mostly in the water tho.![]()
I have no idea how she actually got a court to favor her
Mister J said:Unfortunately, the clip I saw zoomed in on the guy's exposed package a couple of times after the deed was done.
...and nary a shot of any lady parts.![]()
You don't see any genitals but there's plenty of humping and thrusting. Mostly in the water tho.![]()
You actually do catch of glimpse of his wang, the camera even zooms in on it when the tip is poking out of the water
Did you read his descip of what she was doing? No?
Ok, there is a HJ involved.
Yes I did, obviously you did not. The description says snuggling and the title says bang. Big difference