Iron Man World Iron Man video game

[J. J. Jameson]

Are you guys playing it on the PC or console? PC graphics suck, I hear.

 

[Iron_Stark]

I'm playing it on the 360 version.

I'll probably end up getting it for my PS2 when the price goes down, since it's different from the next gen systems.

 

[0neDisturbedSOB]

How is it different than next gen?

I'm playing it on 360.

 

[Iron_Stark]

Pretty much the levels are designed different, for example, in the escape level, you're actually fighting enemies inside the cave trying to make your way out.

 

[0neDisturbedSOB]

Really? I wonder why the older consoles got better content.

 

[Styleshift]

Reviews haven't been to good for Iron man...we're talking in the 3/10's here.whats everyones personal opinion of the game?

 

[Troy_Parker]

I'm stuck on the save pepper mission on PS2 I can get thru half of it den I'm stuck on the bit where ur ment 2 destroy all of the tanks, etc which are destroying the buildings....THEY'RE EVERYWHERE, I CAN'T BE EVERYWHERE....HELP ME!!

 

[Jick]

I'm stuck on the save pepper mission on PS2 I can get thru half of it den I'm stuck on the bit where ur ment 2 destroy all of the tanks, etc which are destroying the buildings....THEY'RE EVERYWHERE, I CAN'T BE EVERYWHERE....HELP ME!!

yeah I lost the first time...but I made it in the second.
just keep flying around. when you destroy a tank...go and destroy the other.
tanks and mans with cannons are the bigger problem.
next level is a ****. Horgan kill me with two blasts.

 

[Troy_Parker]

thx dis shud help

 

[Iron_Stark]

Reviews haven't been to good for Iron man...we're talking in the 3/10's here.whats everyones personal opinion of the game?

IGN is the only site I've seen Iron Man get a 3/10, the rest have been 5-6, which I agree with.

I thought it could've been better, the concept was great, the execution was poor.

The problem was that it had too many things going on at once, the constant bombardment, the frustruation of easily being killed by enemies you didn't even know were shooting at you and not being able to save mid level.

 

[BizarroAids]

IGN is the only site I've seen Iron Man get a 3/10, the rest have been 5-6, which I agree with.

I thought it could've been better, the concept was great, the execution was poor.

The problem was that it had too many things going on at once, the constant bombardment, the frustruation of easily being killed by enemies you didn't even know were shooting at you and not being able to save mid level.

I have to agree with that. I"d give it a 5. I bought the game, knowing fully what I was getting into. The graphics are cool with me. The walking and melee attacks are kinda meh...but I'm enjoying flight and chasing after the planes and helicopters.

It's fun, could be better. But I won't stop playing it, I plan on beating it. Just because it's an Iron Man game. And I haven't got to play as shellhead since Iron Man/XO Manwar (not counting M:UA)

 

[Comikaze]

IGN is the only site I've seen Iron Man get a 3/10, the rest have been 5-6, which I agree with.

I thought it could've been better, the concept was great, the execution was poor.

The problem was that it had too many things going on at once, the constant bombardment, the frustruation of easily being killed by enemies you didn't even know were shooting at you and not being able to save mid level.

I really don't go with reviews these days because they simply have no idea on what they are talking about, IGN apparently thought that the PS2 game was better, which i find hard to belive since its based on the same design, while giving GTA4 aperfect 10 which while the game is good its not a 10 definatly not a ten.