Serious question, I acknowledge JP3 was a very weak movie, but why all the hate for Spinosaurus?
And why does everyone act like it's sacrilege for the Spino to kill a T-Rex?
A few reasons. For one, the Rex is the tyrant lizard king. He's pretty much the face of dinosaurs and untouchable in the public eye. Secondly, from a more quantifiable perspective, the spino would have had no chance against a Rex. Sure the spino might be bigger, but it is built for eating fish; while the Rex has the most powerful bite force of any land animal with an incredibly powerful neck meant to not only hold its massive head, but to rip and destroy whatever gets in its jaws - not only should the spino have been dead from the first bite to its neck, it wouldn't have been able to get away from the jaws, and certainly wouldn't have been able to over power the Rex to snap its neck (which was a dumb finishing move regardless).
All that being said, I understand their desire to bring in new dinosaurs, but there are others they could face used that would have had a more realistic chance at beating a T. rex but they went with the spino because it looked so vastly different.
Because they wanted to show of the new big bad dinosaur and how awesome it was, so they killed off the vastly superior T-Rex! Still, I like the Spinosaurus and I am glad they did go with a more unique looking carnivore.I don't really hate the Spinosaurus since it was cool in its own right, but the fact that the T-Rex, the most badass dinosaur of the previous two films, got disposed of like that is outrageous. They made the T-Rex look ******ed in JP3, and it only had a minute of screen time!
True.I have enjoyed all the movies. JP3 was obviously the weakest but it isn't the travesty as some claim to be. It is no where as bad as 3rd movie of other franchises...
I always took that T-Rex in JP3 as a juvenile T-Rex by the look of his/her size when the group first runs into it.
So I was never that pissed then the Spino beat it.
The area on Isla Sorna that JP3 took place on was set in the north of the island and cut off from the area that Malcolm and co visited in TLW (hence why one looks like a tropical jungle and the other looks like a forest) so it's possible that the T-Rex was a smaller variety to the others.

It being a scavenger is still up in debate, but the most agreed upon theory is that it was an opportunistic eater: it's size and strength allowed it to scare/fight off other predators as well as bring down its own prey.Wan't T-Rex declared to be just a scavenger ?
I thought that they made Spinosauraus ...who did eat fish, a land based hunter predator, which was stupid but the T-Rex was not that alpha predator either.
In the animal kingdom it can be a different story, but there is such a thing as the spirit of a champion. You don't have to be the biggest to be the baddest and best. A real champion finds a way to win against the odds. That's what I hope to see with the T-Rex potentially taking down the i-Rex, perhaps with the help of Velociraptors.
I have enjoyed all the movies. JP3 was obviously the weakest but it isn't the travesty as some claim to be. It is no where as bad as 3rd movie of other franchises...
Agreed. It feels like the studio sat around and said 'we need to make another movie to fill our quota....how about another Jurassic Park?'JP3 isn't as godawful as it's made out to be, it just feels like this pointless side tangent.
The thing that annoyed me most about JP3 was seeing Ellie and Alan broken up, and Ellie married to someone else with kids. After the ending to JP, which implied Alan had really warmed to kids after spending all that time with Lex and Tim, it didn't feel right that Ellie was married and had children with another guy.
The thing that annoyed me most about JP3 was seeing Ellie and Alan broken up, and Ellie married to someone else with kids. After the ending to JP, which implied Alan had really warmed to kids after spending all that time with Lex and Tim, it didn't feel right that Ellie was married and had children with another guy.