• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Kang the Conquerer NOT owned by Marvel

I can't wait to see Kang in the X-men/Fantastic Four!
 
NO :wall: NO:wall: NO:wall:

Dammit! I was hoping to see him one day in an Avengers movie

I dread how bad Fox would screw him up in a Trank FFINO movie.

He'll probably be another blogger. K&N9. :o

How could Fox end up with him? Marvel have Black Panther and the Inhumans, who first appeared in the Fantastic Four. Kang is most associated with the Avengers, not the FF.
 
He'll probably be another blogger. K&N9. :o

How could Fox end up with him? Marvel have Black Panther and the Inhumans, who first appeared in the Fantastic Four. Kang is most associated with the Avengers, not the FF.

It's a crazy mixed up world.
 
I don't know what's worse for the character: that MS can't use him or that Fox can and will f*** it up as usual
 
Said no one ever.
I actually am

Kang could be used as Reed or Dr.Doom's descendant or a future Sue Storm like Ultimate Kang, etc plus he was a huge part in Apocalypse's origin so hopefully he appears in some form(maybe in a similar way Rama Tut was used in X-Men Evolution with hints at his origins and being from the future). If Fox does it right there is an endless realm of possibilities. While I wish he was used in the same way as Quicksilver or Spider-Man only without him dying like so many movie supervillains, interested where they go from with Kang if they do go somewhere with Kang. It depends on what Fox, Bryan Singer, Simon Kinberg, etc take the character.


I love how people act like Fox will ruin it when they haven't seen and hear what they will do with (this is post Rothman Fox) and First Class, DoFP, The Wolverine and judging by pictures and interviews of Apocalypse , it's long and far from the failure and disappointment that Last Stand, Daredevil, FF 1 and 2, Electra and X-Men Origins: Wolverine said. The jury is still out on FF reboot though
 
Last edited:
I'm pretty disappointed hearing this. Hopefully Marvel can get his rights, and the Fantastic Four for that matter, back in the not too distant future.
 
Without Kang, there go my hopes that we'd see an adaptation of Kang Dynasty.

Hopes for Phase 4 Avengers films now

Mighty Avengers: Atlantis Attacks

West Coast Avengers: Evolutionary War.
 
I have no idea that Kang isn't with MCU. It goes to show that Keige is rather tight-lipped about the properties they actually own. My impression has always been that Kang is an Avengers villain, not a F4 villain, but it appears to be not the case. Another reason why Marvel needs to get their First Family back asap.
 
Without Galactus OR Kang, Marvel is in deep doo-doo.


They lack anymore threats in the same league as Thanos.
They have Onslaught, Graviton, The Cabal, The Masters of Evil, The Squadron Supreme, Attuma and...they have alot of threatening villains. You just have to dig deep.
 
They have Onslaught, Graviton, The Cabal, The Masters of Evil, The Squadron Supreme, Attuma and...they have alot of threatening villains. You just have to dig deep.

Graviton hasn't been much of a threat in the MCU. He's been imprisoned since the first season of Agents of SHIELD, and he was defeated rather easily just by Coulson alone. At the moment he's hardly a movie-level villain, and the actor isn't exactly at that level either.
 
I was hoping for Kang in phase 4, largely because I wanted to see Hulk one-timing a T Rex. I suppose a visit to the Savage Land would suffice.

The Grandmaster could probably fill the Kang role in future adventures. I could see him setting off an old fashioned multi super hero team throw-down in Phase 4, Avengers vs Inhumans.
 
Last edited:
That's so weird that Fox has the rights. I always thought Kang was an Avengers villain. Maybe the rights are shared like Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch?

Marvel-Characters-Movie-Studio-Ownership-570x456.jpg


Scarlett Centurion, Kang and Immortus are aliases for Pharaoh Rama Tut, who is a FF property, which Fox has the rights to. Not sure they can use him in a X-Men movie or not.
 
They have Onslaught, Graviton, The Cabal, The Masters of Evil, The Squadron Supreme, Attuma and...they have alot of threatening villains. You just have to dig deep.

Fox owns Onslaught.

With the Avengers villains, the obvious choices are Namor, High Evolutionary, Green Goblin and MODOK.
 
Well ****!....

Jesus, Hera, Rao, please be another Cleopatra situation for Fox soon so every character they have can come back.
 
I actually am

Kang could be used as Reed or Dr.Doom's descendant or a future Sue Storm like Ultimate Kang, etc plus he was a huge part in Apocalypse's origin so hopefully he appears in some form(maybe in a similar way Rama Tut was used in X-Men Evolution with hints at his origins and being from the future). If Fox does it right there is an endless realm of possibilities. While I wish he was used in the same way as Quicksilver or Spider-Man only without him dying like so many movie supervillains, interested where they go from with Kang if they do go somewhere with Kang. It depends on what Fox, Bryan Singer, Simon Kinberg, etc take the character.


I love how people act like Fox will ruin it when they haven't seen and hear what they will do with (this is post Rothman Fox) and First Class, DoFP, The Wolverine and judging by pictures and interviews of Apocalypse , it's long and far from the failure and disappointment that Last Stand, Daredevil, FF 1 and 2, Electra and X-Men Origins: Wolverine said. The jury is still out on FF reboot though

You neglect the cold stone truth that Fox won't use him anymore than the Shi'ar Empire.

Fox is still greedy and untrusting whether its Rothman or Watts.
 
Marvel-Characters-Movie-Studio-Ownership-570x456.jpg


Scarlett Centurion, Kang and Immortus are aliases for Pharaoh Rama Tut, who is a FF property, which Fox has the rights to. Not sure they can use him in a X-Men movie or not.

Im still baffled by why Universal still has Namor when they've not done anything with him since gaining the film rights.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,965
Messages
22,045,210
Members
45,843
Latest member
JoeSoap
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"