Kang the Conquerer NOT owned by Marvel

[3dman27]

I'm not as well versed in Avengers villains as I am with others but isn't Kang's origin story tied heavily to Fantastic Four and Apocalypse?

yes he is I think he was supposed to be reed's father

 

[3dman27]

i will use my kang foo.

lol

 

[seahammer]

Unfortunate but not the end of the world.

For Doom Marvel's got The High Evolutionary, Osborn, Real Mandarin and Zemo (who's pending)

MCU is still yet to introduce Modoc, Taskmaster, Skrulls, Savage land inhabitants, Cancer-verse (GoTG maybe)

And a decent fill in for Galactus would be Planet Ego. Give him some upgraded minions/heralds and most would be fine with that.

After thinking about it I really don't care about Kang. The only reason people are worried is because Fox has him and won't likely ever use him. But it's Marvel after all and it's not like they can't make new ones that Fox can't touch.

Great suggestions in this post, Starscream! Many of those ideas are on my personal must-see wishlist for the MCU.

 

[cleverusername8]

Dang, he would have made an awesome big bad for Phase 4 and beyond.