The Shape
In the shadows
- Joined
- May 30, 2006
- Messages
- 21,552
- Reaction score
- 4,455
- Points
- 103
So you're saying in terms of box office gross this is going to have some... long legs?
![]()
So you're saying in terms of box office gross this is going to have some... long legs?
![]()
So you're saying in terms of box office gross this is going to have some... long legs?
![]()
So you're saying in terms of box office gross this is going to have some... long legs?
![]()
I think the one that sticks out the most though is what the hell Cage’s character called himself Longlegs. Has Perkins ever explained that? lol
People complaining about this feeling like a bait and switch in the marketing seem to not know how horror movies need to be marketed these days to attract an audience. The Witch got the same complaints. If it were plastered all over the trailers what the true nature of the film is, that completely defeats the purpose that it’s suppose to take you on a ride that goes in seemingly unexpected directions. Coupling this with “horror movie logic”, people looking for explanations for why there’s a supernatural element, again, miss the point of some horror movies. Even those with elements of hyper realism. There shouldn’t always be an explanation. If the original Nightmare on Elm Street came out today, the same critics would question how Freddy went from a janitor to a supernatural demon that can invade teenagers’ dreams.
I’m saying all this as someone who didn’t find Longlegs particularly interesting or groundbreaking, but it was great to see something new versus the same ghost crap and remakes/sequels we’ve been seeing for the last decade from Blumhouse and Warner Brothers.
I don’t really get why people thought this was going to be like Silence of the Lambs and then when it wasn’t they were disappointed. Aside from a young female FBI agent investigating (potential) serial murders, the similarities kind of end there. She doesn’t go visit an imprisoned serial killer for insights on another one. There are no cannibal or skinning aspects to the killings. The marketing was so ambiguous that it didn’t make me think of Silence of the Lambs once.
I don’t know. It just seems weird that people are angry that this movie wasn’t a loose remake of another movie. If you want to watch Silence of the Lambs, just watch Silence of the Lambs. If you didn’t like this movie, fine. But judge it based on its own merits.
You mean to say people saw the movie not onccce, not twiiice, but as many times as they llllike!?![]()
Kudos to Osgood Perkins for basically allowing Cage to reenact his “SCRAAAAPIN AT THE DOOOR” moment in that scene and making it actually work.