- Joined
- Oct 24, 2002
- Messages
- 75,012
- Reaction score
- 30,952
- Points
- 203
you guys are all missing the point. luke can be flawed. but there is a difference between being flawed, and being an apathetic coward. the fleeting thought of killing kylo is LESS the problem than the aftermath: that luke abandons his nephew, his sister, his pal han, and the ENTIRE universe. he lets his nephew get corrupted by a mysterious and dangerous power in snoke, and sits idly by as the first order gains prominence.
a momentary lapse in judgment can be explained away -- but luke being a coward and giving up on everyone and everything is a betrayal of the character. johnson clearly wanted to gloss this over as much as possible because it would take a lot of brain power to answer the question: if luke wasn't a coward and isn't dead, how could snoke, kylo, and the first order come to power? a proper answer would have taken writers that cared a lot more about the fidelity of the original characters than apparently johnson and co.
I don't call him a coward....I call him a man with PTSD.

t:
