Octoberist
point blank
- Joined
- May 13, 2005
- Messages
- 46,465
- Reaction score
- 17
- Points
- 33
I wonder if Hardy is gonna grow out his hair longer or not, because currently his hair is similar to his do in 'THis Means War'.
I wonder if Hardy is gonna grow out his hair longer or not, because currently his hair is similar to his do in 'THis Means War'.
http://www.informante.web.na/index....39:mad-max-iv-producer-receives-heart-surgeryMad Max IV producer receives heart surgery
WRITTEN BY FLORIS STEENKAMP
WEDNESDAY, 25 APRIL 2012 22:17
Local movie industry sources, currently involved in preparations for the filming of Mad Max IV at various locations in the central coastal region, confirmed this week that the producer George Miller had to undergo a cardiac procedure in Australia recently.
Crew members consulted said the producer urgently needed the medical procedure for a defective heart valve, but insisted that Miller has made a good recovery and is expected in Namibia as early as next week. Whether the purpose of Millers arrival in Namibia is to start filming or whether it is a routine visit to check that preparations for casting later this year are up to standard remains unclear.
South African-born Hollywood sensation, Charlize Theron, will star in Mad Max IV and some coastal residents are hoping to catch a glimpse of her in the streets of Swakopmund or Walvis Bay soon.
t:i didnt mean a new origin but what about the new generation thats not fimilar with the story?i think its import to see what makes max tick like his wife and kid being brutely murdered.it could be rebooted and told in a defferent way without having connect to the gibson films.i dont see why they are doing a sequel to the gibson films when the last was over 20 years ago.its kida like why man of steel is doing the origin again because superman returns tried to be a sequel to the older films and failed.a new origin? then they would have to change it. because i would be boring to me to watch the same movie again.
Nah, its really nothing tell either. The first Mad Max is a boring movie (flamesuit oni didnt mean a new origin but what about the new generation thats not fimilar with the story?i think its import to see what makes max tick like his wife and kid being brutely murdered.it could be rebooted and told in a defferent way without having connect to the gibson films.i dont see why they are doing a sequel to the gibson films when the last was over 20 years ago.its kida like why man of steel is doing the origin again because superman returns tried to be a sequel to the older films and failed.
) so I'm glad this pays tribute t the series by expanding the mythology rather than rebooting it like every other series would have done. 
I liked some of the imagery and concepts of the first Mad Max, like how more 'green' it was despite being Post Apocalyptic. But I have to agree that the pacing was meandering. I liked it, but the Road Warrior destroys it with its raw energy.
Also, Max is the classic drifter. All we need to know, like what Obin said, is that he's a leather clad loner who fights bikers in the Aussie Wastelands. While I cherish wonderful character development, Mad Max is one of the rare expect ions because he's such a bad ass. That's all we need to know. Just like Snake Plissken.
We don't need to know everything about him especially in this day and age where everything has to be spelled out to people. If Indiana Jones didn't exist until now, Raiders of the Lost Ark would feature and over explain Indiana's backstory thus eliminating any mystery to the character.

Why don't they call him the director, writer, and producer... If I'd have to pick one of those, I'd pick the director, not the producer.