Massive Software on X3

Advanced Dark

Avenger
Joined
Nov 17, 2005
Messages
17,587
Reaction score
1
Points
31
VFX Facilities Create Mayhem with Massive for X-Men: The Last Stand
Framestore CFC and WETA Digital Leverage Massive to Address Complex Visual Effects Challenges
(June 11, 2006)
Massive Software announced that its Academy Award®-winning artificial life-based 3D animation system has been used by visual effects companies Framestore CFC and WETA Digital for the new X-Men movie X-Men: The Last Stand (Twentieth Century Fox). With Massive, visual effects studios can animate anywhere from a few to a few hundred thousand realistically responding digital characters, helping artists and animators tackle ever more ambitious effects challenges and scenes, such as those seen in X3.

Both Framestore CFC and WETA Digital used Massive to craft scenes of mayhem in the Brett Ratner-directed movie, which sees war breaking out after a cure for mutant genes is found.

"We were looking for an off-the-shelf solution we could drop into our pipeline," said Craig Lyn, Visual Effects Supervisor, Framestore CFC. "Our Golden Gate crowd scenes called for numerous characters and we weren't planning on doing a motion capture session. Massive provided a good set of pre-built agents with motion capture actions and the ability to have them respond in their own ways to their surroundings."




"We've adopted Massive for our latest set of projects," added Christophe Meslin, Head of Systems Support, Framestore CFC. "It has some great crowd-simulation features, and we are looking forward to making it our primary solution in this area."

WETA Digital, who first pioneered the use of Massive for epic-level film effects and has forwarded that innovation with projects such as King Kong, again took advantage of the flexibility and speed of Massive for about 20 shots in X-Men: The Last Stand.

"One of the reasons Fox came to WETA Digital was for our ability to quickly populate the Alcatraz set, which is where some of the central action in this movie takes place. We were able to not only use Massive for crowds of people, but also for populating cars on the Golden Gate Bridge," commented Eric Saindon, Visual Effects Supervisor, WETA Digital

Massive products Massive Prime, Massive Jet and Massive Ready-to-Run Agents help filmmakers and vfx artists expand the realms of possibility by allowing scenes and stunts to be achieved with autonomously responding virtual characters. With recent uses on motion pictures from Poseidon and The Promise to The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe and King Kong, Massive has become a must-have toolset as the industry pushes the bounds of epic-level productions and creative ideas.

For more about Massive Prime, Massive Jet, Ready-to-Run Agents and applications for Massive in feature film please visit
www.massivesoftware.com.

About Massive Software
Springing into existence to help artists solve real-world production needs on The Lord of the Rings films, Massive Software is the leading creator of artificial intelligence-based 3D animation systems. Massive was founded when Stephen Regelous programmed a unique piece of software for director Peter Jackson to make creation of complicated visual effects scenes involving hundreds of thousands of digital characters a practical reality. Massive garnered a Scientific and Engineering Award from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences in 2004.

Today, Massive Software develops a family of standalone, commercially available products, with customers including Weta Digital, Animal Logic, Rhythm & Hues, Digital Domain, CIS Hollywood and other leading digital production and effects studios. For more information, please contact Massive North America (+1 310-837-7878), New Zealand (+64 9-3030-030), Europe (+44 20 7096 1605) or visit www.massivesoftware.com.

Not sure if this was posted before but this article just popped up as new today.
 
COOL.

I can only hope that X3 is nominated for best visual effects at OSCAR.

The only movies that will be considered will be X3, SR, POTC 2, ERAGON, NIGHT AT THE MUSEUM and i don't know the other two movies yet.
 
antariksh said:
COOL.

I can only hope that X3 is nominated for best visual effects at OSCAR.

Yeah they can show the scene where Colossus 'waters' up in the Danger Room as the clip for the Oscars.
 
Nominated for an Oscor?

I thought the sfx in x2 were better.
 
Gilpesh said:
Yeah they can show the scene where Colossus 'waters' up in the Danger Room as the clip for the Oscars.

U were making fun of X3 weren't u??

They should show the PHEONIX VS. XAVIER and the GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE and the last PHEONIX scene where she is destroying everything.
 
why is this thread turning me on? ... gah. maybe the sfx were orgasmic in the X-Men movies


...its cold here.
 
X3's F/X were far superior overall compared to X2 give me a break. That Golden Gate bridge sequence beats anything I've seen in the X-Films.
 
Advanced Dark said:
X3's F/X were far superior overall compared to X2 give me a break. That Golden Gate bridge sequence beats anything I've seen in the X-Films.

That bridge scene was amazing. Too bad they can do something huge like that but they cannot make it look like a guy has metal skin.
 
Gilpesh said:
That bridge scene was amazing. Too bad they can do something huge like that but they cannot make it look like a guy has metal skin.
the first Godzilla looked better than Colossus in the DR. :o
 
Gilpesh said:
That bridge scene was amazing. Too bad they can do something huge like that but they cannot make it look like a guy has metal skin.

So tell me what a guy in metal skin should look like? It looked fine to me. Think about it...how the hell were they supposed to do it. It was way better than Singers version in X2.
 
Advanced Dark said:
So tell me what a guy in metal skin should look like? It looked fine to me. Think about it...how the hell were they supposed to do it. It was way better than Singers version in X2.

you better get new glasses man, right there was the dumbest post anyone could have ever wrote.......... lmao.........
 
^ Not as dumb as you screaming how X3 would never beat X2 at the box office, and that I was an idiot and fool to think X3 would hit 100 million in 4 days while you predicted less than 85 million. Also not as dumb as your fake reviews you posted here and on AICN and got busted for and then you tried to act like it was a joke to prove a point...when you got busted. Don't bother responding. You're an A-Hat on ignore again.
 
Advanced Dark said:
^ Not as dumb as you screaming how X3 would never beat X2 at the box office, and that I was an idiot and fool to think X3 would hit 100 million in 4 days while you predicted less than 85 million. Also not as dumb as your fake reviews you posted here and on AICN and got busted for and then you tried to act like it was a joke to prove a point...when you got busted. Don't bother responding. You're an A-Hat on ignore again.

fact has been proven, Advanced Moron shoudl be your name, dumb
Fu<k

wow, your back on my buddy list
 
Advanced Dark said:
Remove user from ignore list
JokerNick This message is hidden because JokerNick is on your ignore list.</SPAN>

shows a true sign of intellegence and overal fortatude, puts on ignore list,this guy is the proven fact of why brothers and sisters should not have kids, the get some piece of ball-less trash like this guy, or girl or hermanpherdite.........
 
^ He's a troll causing problems. You should see his posts on other boards. His screen name says it all. He can scream into the ignore void all he wants.
 
Advanced Dark said:
^ He's a troll causing problems. You should see his posts on other boards. His screen name says it all. He can scream into the ignore void all he wants.

why don't you look up the defenition of a troll, dumb a$$, honeslty, I would have to put two in my chest and one int he head if I was you.......... you have to be pumping gas or waiting tables for a living with your intellegence, wow, I feel bad for you
 
[SIZE=+2]Internet Trolls[/SIZE] Copyright © 2001, 2006 by Timothy Campbell
January 27 2006 Edition
http://members.aol.com/intwg/trolls.htm
Approximate Reading Time: 7 Minutes
[SIZE=+1]Table of Contents[/SIZE]

What is a Troll?
Why Does it Matter?
What Can be Done about Trolls?
What Not to Do
Impersonation
The Webmaster's Challenge
What about Free Speech?
Why Do They Do It?
Conclusion
Resources
[SIZE=+1]What is a Troll?[/SIZE]

Top An Internet "troll" is a person who delights in sowing discord on the Internet. He (and it is usually he) tries to start arguments and upset people.
Trolls see Internet communications services as convenient venues for their bizarre game. For some reason, they don't "get" that they are hurting real people. To them, other Internet users are not quite human but are a kind of digital abstraction. As a result, they feel no sorrow whatsoever for the pain they inflict. Indeed, the greater the suffering they cause, the greater their 'achievement' (as they see it). At the moment, the relative anonymity of the net allows trolls to flourish.
Trolls are utterly impervious to criticism (constructive or otherwise). You cannot negotiate with them; you cannot cause them to feel shame or compassion; you cannot reason with them. They cannot be made to feel remorse. For some reason, trolls do not feel they are bound by the rules of courtesy or social responsibility.
Perhaps this sounds inconceivable. You may think, "Surely there is something I can write that will change them." But a true troll can not be changed by mere words.

[SIZE=+1]Why Does it Matter?[/SIZE]

Some people — particularly those who have been online for years — are not upset by trolls and consider them an inevitable hazard of using the net. As the saying goes, "You can't have a picnic without ants."
It would be nice if everybody was so easy-going, but the sad fact is that trolls do discourage people. Established posters may leave a message board because of the arguments that trolls ignite, and lurkers (people who read but do not post) may decide that they do not want to expose themselves to abuse and thus never get involved.
Another problem is that the negative emotions stirred up by trolls leak over into other discussions. Normally affable people can become bitter after reading an angry interchange between a troll and his victims, and this can poison previously friendly interactions between long-time users.
Finally, trolls create a paranoid environment, such that a casual criticism by a new arrival can elicit a ferocious and inappropriate backlash.
The Internet is a wonderful resource which is breaking down barriers and stripping away prejudice. Trolls threaten our continued enjoyment of this beautiful forum for ideas.

[SIZE=+1]What Can be Done about Trolls?[/SIZE]

When you suspect that somebody is a troll, you might try responding with a polite, mild message to see if it's just somebody in a bad mood. Internet users sometimes let their passions get away from them when seated safely behind their keyboard. If you ignore their bluster and respond in a pleasant manner, they usually calm down.
However, if the person persists in being beastly, and seems to enjoy being unpleasant, the only effective position is summed up as follows:
[FONT=verdana,sans serif]The only way to deal with trolls is to limit your reaction to reminding others not to respond to trolls.[/FONT]
When you try to reason with a troll, he wins. When you insult a troll, he wins. When you scream at a troll, he wins. The only thing that trolls can't handle is being ignored.
[SIZE=+1]What Not to Do[/SIZE]

already stated, it is futile to try to "cure" a troll of his obsession. But perhaps you simply cannot bear the hostile environment that the troll is creating and want to go away for a while.
If you do that, then for the sake of the others on the system, please do not post a dramatic "Goodbye!" message. This convinces the troll that he is winning the battle. There is, perhaps, no message you can write on a message system that is as damaging as an announcement that you are leaving because of the hostility that the troll has kindled.
If you feel you must say something, a discreet message to the system operator (and some of the others users, if you have their email addresses) is the best course of action. Incidentally, if you are writing the letter in an agitated state, it is a good idea to wait an hour and then give it one last review before you actually send it. That might spare you the pain of saying things that you don't really mean to people you like.
[SIZE=+1][/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]Impersonation[/SIZE]

One technique used by trolls to generate chaos is to pretend to be a well-liked person. On some systems there is nothing to prevent somebody from signing your name to a distasteful message. On other systems the troll may have to be a bit more wiley, perhaps by replacing one character with another. Here are some examples of various spoofing gimmicks that could be used against a person named Brenda Q. O'Really:
[FONT=Courier New,Courier]Brenda Q. O"ReallyBrenda Q. 0'ReallyBrenda Q O'ReallyBrenda Q. O'Rea11yBredna Q. O'Really8renda Q. O'Really[/FONT][SIZE=-1]Note: "Brenda Q. O'Really" is a made-up name used to illustrate spoofing and is not intended to refer to a particular person.[/SIZE]
If you react with anger, the troll wins. So if you see a message impersonating you on a message board, simply write a follow-up reply entitled "[FONT=comic sans ms,sans serif]That Wasn't Me[/FONT]" and type only this:
[FONT=verdana,sans serif]I did not write that message; it is a fake.[/FONT]
Of course, sometimes you will find that people who know you well have already identified the message as a fake and have tagged it as such. After all, one of the troll's goals is to make you look bad. If you have a good reputation, people will be tipped off if a message that you apparently wrote is completely out of character.
Trolls have been known to become so irritated at having their spoofs identified that they have learned to write in another person's style. They may end up writing an intelligent message that is indistinguishable from your own golden words. If that happens, you can always just let the post stand and take credit for it!
Trolls will also sometimes write a "That Wasn't Me" message after a genuine one, attempting to elicit a denial. There really is no reason to give him what he wants, since a "That Wasn't Me" warning merely reminds people to be skeptical. That is to say, it is of no real consequence if somebody isn't sure that you wrote a normal message, since in the long run it is the ideas that are important.


[SIZE=+1]The Webmaster's Challenge[/SIZE]

When trolls are ignored they step up their attacks, desperately seeking the attention they crave. Their messages become more and more foul, and they post ever more of them. Alternatively, they may protest that their right to free speech is being curtailed — more on this later.
The moderator of a message board may not be able to delete a troll's messages right away, but their job is made much harder if they also have to read numerous replies to trolls. They are also forced to decide whether or not to delete posts from well-meaning folks which have the unintended effect of encouraging the troll.
Some webmasters have to endure conscientious users telling them that they are "acting like dictators" and should never delete a single message. These people may be misinformed: they may have arrived at their opinion about a troll based on the messages they see, never realizing that the webmaster has already deleted his most horrific material. Please remember that a troll does have an alternative if he has something of value to say: there are services on the net that provide messaging systems free of charge. So the troll can set up his own message board, where he can make his own decisions about the kind of content he will tolerate.
Just how much can we expect of a webmaster when it comes to preserving the principles of free speech? Some trolls find sport in determining what the breaking point is for a particular message board operator. They might post a dozen messages, each of which contains 400 lines of the letter "J". That is a form of expression, to be sure, but would you consider it your duty to play host to such a person?
Perhaps the most difficult challenge for a webmaster is deciding whether to take steps against a troll that a few people find entertaining. Some trolls do have a creative spark and have chosen to squander it on being disruptive. There is a certain perverse pleasure in watching some of them. Ultimately, though, the webmaster has to decide if the troll actually cares about putting on a good show for the regular participants, or is simply playing to an audience of one — himself.
[SIZE=+1][/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]What about Free Speech?[/SIZE]

When trolls find that their efforts are being successfully resisted, they often complain that their right to free speech is being infringed. Let us examine that claim.
While most people on the Internet are ardent defenders of free speech, it is not an absolute right; there are practical limitations. For example, you may not scream out "Fire!" in a crowded theatre, and you may not make jokes about bombs while waiting to board an airplane. We accept these limitations because we recognize that they serve a greater good.
Another useful example is the control of the radio frequency spectrum. You might wish to set up a powerful radio station to broadcast your ideas, but you cannot do so without applying for a license. Again, this is a practical limitation: if everybody broadcasted without restriction, the repercussions would be annoying at best and life-threatening at worst.
The radio example is helpful for another reason: with countless people having a legitimate need to use radio communications, it is important to ensure that nobody is 'monopolizing the channel'. There are only so many clear channels available in each frequency band and these must be shared.
When a troll attacks a message board, he generally posts a lot of messages. Even if his messages are not particularly inflammatory, they can be so numerous that they drown out the regular conversations (this is known as 'flooding'). Needless to say, no one person's opinions can be allowed to monopolize a channel.
The ultimate response to the 'free speech' argument is this: while we may have the right to say more or less whatever we want, we do not have the right to say it wherever we want. You may feel strongly about the fact that your neighbour has not mowed his lawn for two months, but you do not have the right to berate him in his own living room. Similarly, if a webmaster tells a troll that he is not welcome, the troll has no "right" to remain. This is particularly true on the numerous free communications services offered on the net. (On pay systems, the troll might be justified in asking for a refund.)
[SIZE=+1][/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]Why Do They Do It?[/SIZE]

Affirmation.
Regular net users know how delightful it is when somebody responds to something they have written. It is a meeting of the minds, which is an intellectual thrill, but it is also an acknowledgement of one's value — and that can be a very satisfying emotional reward.
Trolls crave attention, and they care not whether it is positive or negative. They see the Internet as a mirror into which they can gaze in narcissistic rapture.
If you want a deeper analysis than that, perhaps a psychologist can shed some additional light on the matter.
[SIZE=+1][/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]Conclusion[/SIZE]Next time you are on a message board and you see a post by somebody whom you think is a troll, and you feel you must reply, simply write a follow-up message entitled "[FONT=comic sans ms,sans serif]Troll Alert[/FONT]" and type only this:
[FONT=verdana,sans serif]The only way to deal with trolls is to limit your reaction to reminding others not to respond to trolls.
[/FONT]By posting such a message, you let the troll know that you know what he is, and that you are not going to get dragged into his twisted little hobby.
The Internet is a splendidly haphazard collection of both serious and silly material. Because it is so free, there are bound to be problems. I think that we can best enjoy it if we deal with everything that happens online with a wry grin and a ready shrug.


Get Iggy wit it.
 
^ He's a troll. Report him. I just did. Just look at his sig which links everyone to where he trolled the AICN boards with a fake review.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"