Michael Stone nearly kills Ian Paisley and Jerry Adams

kainedamo

Superhero
Joined
Sep 11, 2001
Messages
9,713
Reaction score
0
Points
31
stonecoltm4.jpg


Okay, the title is a slight exaggeration.

But earlier today, Loyalist terrorist Michael Stone stormed Stormont, where assemply talks were being held, with many political figures present, including Ian Paisley and Gerry Adams.

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/story.jsp?story=716038

Stone had bombs on him, aswell as a knife and a gun.

Lucky for us, footage of the whole thing was taken!

http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/11/24/nireland.parliament/

And thats not the first time the nutcase has been caught on tape being a psychopath!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwMFn-cWjtY
 
Unfortunately, now you have.

What Michael Stone did today was a desperate attempt to stop the peace process, to stop some progress being made on the power sharing. Before today, some unionists think it was a betrayel on Ian Paisley's part to FINALLY show some sign of sitting with Sinn Fein to share power. I hope today shows people that we can only move ahead with two main parties working together. Men like Michael Stone are increasingly a thing of the past.
 
He looks like my dad's old business partner.
 
I hate this man.

That is all...
 
Did you guys see that news footage of him from years and years ago at a cemetary, shooting people? He got put away and his sentence was 200 years. He was released under the Good Friday Agreement. Then the psycho tries this.

It's amusing that both incidents (well maybe not so much the first incident) were caught on tape.
 
People like Stone make me sick to my stomach.

People like Stone think that, by initiating murder and carnage, they can achieve change or some sort of vindication for what they deem 'wrong'.

What's wrong is killing. What's wrong is carrying bombs. What's wrong is violence.

I don't think violence will ever cease. Not while extremists like Stone live. I praise the police at Stormont- they intercepted and subdued Stone effectively and before he could do any harm...like the tragedy at the graveyard.
 
He was apprahended by a woman. HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!
 
Reading today's paper. Apparently, the woman hit him over the head with the butt of his own gun.
 
I thought STONE was shot in the head shortly after he was released from Prison for the bombing at that funeral?
 
Hmmm... I wiki'ed him... Looks like I had his history aall wrong.

Somebody needs to kill him anyways :o
 
The guy is an idiot and it was one of the worse attempts of assassination ever.
 
arachnid-guy said:
People like Stone make me sick to my stomach.

People like Stone think that, by initiating murder and carnage, they can achieve change or some sort of vindication for what they deem 'wrong'.

What's wrong is killing. What's wrong is carrying bombs. What's wrong is violence.

I don't think violence will ever cease. Not while extremists like Stone live. I praise the police at Stormont- they intercepted and subdued Stone effectively and before he could do any harm...like the tragedy at the graveyard.
I don't really, it took the proper police 10 minutes to reach Stormont.

A PSG fan was shot a few days ago for nothing as bad as this yet this man is only restrained by a few guards. He should've been shot on sight
 
Unarmed security staff were the ones that restrained him. Good job on their behalf.
 
kainedamo said:
Unarmed security staff were the ones that restrained him. Good job on their behalf.

Well that's who I meant. They did a great job.
 
He was shouting "no surrender" and "no sell out Paisley" as he was being restrained.

I wonder who his target was? Was he gonna try and kill as many politicians as possible? Was he mad at Paisley 'cause he thinks Paisley is selling out? Was he after Gerry Adams?
 
kainedamo said:
Unarmed security staff were the ones that restrained him. Good job on their behalf.
I applaud them. However, in the future they should be armed imo
kainedamo said:
He was shouting "no surrender" and "no sell out Paisley" as he was being restrained.

I wonder who his target was? Was he gonna try and kill as many politicians as possible? Was he mad at Paisley 'cause he thinks Paisley is selling out? Was he after Gerry Adams?
Course he was after Adams
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/6182996.stm
 
Meanwhile, it is understood his early release from jail under the Good Friday Agreement is to be suspended.

Stone was sentenced to more than 800 years in jail after he murdered three men at the funerals of three IRA members in Belfast in 1988.

He was released in 2000 after serving 12 years in prison.


The suspension of his early release is expected to be signed by a Northern Ireland Office minister later on Saturday.

So... does that mean he's going straight to prison and NEVER coming out? If so, good. The man is a nutcase.
 
Wow, I honestly had never heard of this guy before. I don't care whatever he was fighting against, throwing gernades into a crowd mourning at a funeral is sick. I read those comments above and so many calling him hero. I honestly don't know much on the situation dealing with him and will prob read up on it later, it's just how can someone throwing gernades into a crowd at a funeral and running be a hero, a hero is a fireman who runs into a burning building to save a child or something.
 
I've left a few comments.

My guess is is that most of them if not all of them saying "no surrender" bla bla bla are just teenagers and have no real idea of what they're talking about.
 
kainedamo said:
I've left a few comments.

My guess is is that most of them if not all of them saying "no surrender" bla bla bla are just teenagers and have no real idea of what they're talking about.


I've read the comments and I agree with you 110%, kaine. People on youtube applauding Stone's 'heroism' need to wake up. The truth is, anyone willing to mass kill in order to achieve some sort of short-term change is innately bad imo.

People like Stone need to be curbed. In fact, society who think like him needs to be educated in simple manners and that you can't storm in waving a gun, demanding change. You may get media attention...but that's it. The real change is sittign down, discuissing the problems and acting on what's best for the people.

The problem with that is...what happens if the people in majority think what Stone advocates is the right way?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,164
Messages
21,908,482
Members
45,703
Latest member
BMD
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"