- Joined
- Oct 24, 2004
- Messages
- 162,689
- Reaction score
- 12,105
- Points
- 203
It'll probably just be called Mission Impossible 4, right? That's what the last two did. I know it's not the pinnacle of originality.So they've started filming and it STILL DOESN'T HAVE A TITLE?
Why not just call it 'Mission Impossible: Aries' or whatever codename that fits the storyline? done and done.
I wonder what happened after the public spat where Tom Cruise got "fired" from Paramount and Sumner Redstone said he was committing career suicide. Paramount seemed to be really unhappy with how MI:3 performed so I wonder what smoothed things over to go back and do it all over again. Paramount was hesitant to greenlight MI:3 in 2005 because Cruise was going around acting like a lunatic.Only America didn't take to it as well as the rest of the world with it's very strong overseas take.....anyway looks like Ethan is using that disguise to break into the Russian prison.
Well in the third movie, the villains were American and one was an IMF agent.It's good to see Paramount are keeping the 'foreign actors as villains' stereotype alive and well in Mission Impossible 4.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vzj4F6q-R-k
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_TP6SUblyY
Cruise doing some cool stunt work.