Neck Snap or Turning back time: Which Superman final resolution do you prefer ?

Neck Snap or Turning Back time: which do you prefer

  • Neck Snap

  • Turning back time

  • I can live with both of them

  • They're both terrible


Results are only viewable after voting.
neck snap by a mile

he had no choice when that family was in danger of getting fried by Zod

the turning back time thing in the Donner film was incredibly stupid
 
Of course he could always throw Zod down a chasm and crack a smile about it. Or just gun him down in cold blood a la Post Crisis.
 
If I have to choose, neck snap. The turning back time was one of the most ridiculous endings I've ever seen to any movie ever. I probably should watch more movies.
 
If I have to choose, neck snap. The turning back time was one of the most ridiculous endings I've ever seen to any movie ever. I probably should watch more movies.

I've seen thousands, it's still ridiculous.
 
Funny thing is, I never minded the idea of Superman turning back time. But the WAY he did it was really silly. I think I read somewhere that he's not literally supposed to be spinning the Earth in reverse; it just looks that way to us. But I don't think that's true since he then starts flying around it the other way so that the planet starts moving in the right direction again.

Also, it's problematic in that if Superman is so fast that he could pull that off, then catching two missiles on opposite sides of the US should have been no problem for him.

Still a great film, nevertheless and Reeve brings the rage when Lois dies.
 
To me, creating a rule where Superman can´t kill and writing only stories where he has a way out of a tough decision like this is 100% illogical and anti-art.
 
I think the real question we should be asking is... which of these is the better song?

[YT]BsKbwR7WXN4[/YT]

Cher - If I Could Turn Back Time

[YT]9mpHTJUvijk[/YT]

Live - Turn My Head
 
Turning back time was a stinker of an ending to an otherwise fantastic movie.
 
Still a great film, nevertheless and Reeve brings the rage when Lois dies.
[YT]rkJUMz9RTag[/YT]
True, as outrageous as the effect and the back-in-time concept got, the weight of this moment delivered.
Also yes it was selfish, he knew he was doing something "wrong" and did it anyway.
As crazy as it sounds, It made him human.

Havn't seen MoS yet.:O
 
Last edited:
[YT]rkJUMz9RTag[/YT]
True, as outrageous as the effect and the back-in-time concept got, the weight of this moment delivered.
Also yes it was selfish, he knew he was doing something "wrong" and did it anyway.
As crazy as it sounds, It made him human.

Havn't seen MoS yet.:O

Yeah, it was a good moment.

See MOS! It's great (at least some of us think so). Sorry we spoiled the end for you though. :csad:
 
Turning back time was fine for a film that was adapting Silver Age Superman. Neck snapping was fine for a film adapting a modern Post Crisis Superman. That's my answer.
 
Turning back time was fine for a film that was adapting Silver Age Superman. Neck snapping was fine for a film adapting a modern Post Crisis Superman. That's my answer.


Good point. I mean the Silver Age Superman could tow a bunch of planets back into line, and move the moon, so for him to do something so ridiculous wasn't so much of a stretch. Maybe that's why so many people give it a pass, and as someone mentioned it did have a human element to it. Doesn't work for me, but I still think STM is a great movie.

2155403-2.jpg
 
Good point. I mean the Silver Age Superman could tow a bunch of planets back into line, and move the moon, so for him to do something so ridiculous wasn't so much of a stretch. Maybe that's why so many people give it a pass, and as someone mentioned it did have a human element to it. Doesn't work for me, but I still think STM is a great movie.

2155403-2.jpg

I was there when "Superman: The Movie" was first released and I remember that many in the audience didn't quite understand that scene when he turned back time. Some thought that he actually changed the earth's rotation for a moment while he was cleaning things up and still others just didn't understand what he was doing (of course, I knew he was turning back time and the the Earth spinning backwards was just an illustration of what was supposed to be going on). I think it took many years for everyone to get on the same page with respect to that scene (that doesn't mean it wasn't a good movie, though). The neck snapping scene in "Man of Steel" was pretty straight forward. Zod wasn't going to stop until Superman killed him, so that's what Superman did. He was left with no other choice (in-spite of what many people may think). That scene is more contemporary and not out of the scope if what makes up Superman in the comic-books and graphic novels.
 
Good point. I mean the Silver Age Superman could tow a bunch of planets back into line, and move the moon, so for him to do something so ridiculous wasn't so much of a stretch. Maybe that's why so many people give it a pass, and as someone mentioned it did have a human element to it. Doesn't work for me, but I still think STM is a great movie.

2155403-2.jpg

Lol, I love how goofy the Silver Age Superman comics were. Newsflash, Kal... Unless you somehow managed to provide a heat source for all of those planets you're pulling along there, you're not saving billions of lives... You're ending them.
 
I was there when "Superman: The Movie" was first released and I remember that many in the audience didn't quite understand that scene when he turned back time. Some thought that he actually changed the earth's rotation for a moment while he was cleaning things up and still others just didn't understand what he was doing (of course, I knew he was turning back time and the the Earth spinning backwards was just an illustration of what was supposed to be going on). I think it took many years for everyone to get on the same page with respect to that scene (that doesn't mean it wasn't a good movie, though). The neck snapping scene in "Man of Steel" was pretty straight forward. Zod wasn't going to stop until Superman killed him, so that's what Superman did. He was left with no other choice (in-spite of what many people may think). That scene is more contemporary and not out of the scope if what makes up Superman in the comic-books and graphic novels.

To be honest, the reason I started this thread was because I saw Superman the Movie when it first came out as well, back in 1978. I remember sitting in the audience as an 8 year old and thinking......that's ridiculous. If Supes had travelled back through time and stopped the missiles I could have lived with that, but the way it's portrayed he literally turns back time and undoes everything that's been done.....except the missiles ! It was time travel done really badly - I mean, if it was trying to show that Superman literally could turn back time, well that was wayyy out there, even for the Silver Age Supes.

I get some of the human aspects, that it was about Supes deciding his own destiny, and disobeying Jor El, but really, in a film aimed at kids if even kids like me thought it was dumb, well that's not great writing IMO.

The Neck Snap...well like I said earlier, it made total sense within the context of the plot and the tone of the film - and I went into MOS expecting to hate it, and ended up with quite the opposite reaction.

Anyway,

Originally Posted by TheComicbookKid View Post
Lifting the rock.

Man I couldn't bring myself to include anything from Superman Returns......but yeah, it is not a great resolution - although it is something Superman would do, and probably could do (even in the 80's) chuck something massive and dangerous into the Sun.
I've argued about the whole "contintent laced with Kryptonite," so many times that I just can't bear to have another go at it - but I hated Superman Returns.....so much so that I've been asked by other posters not to keep mentioning it, so I'll stop there.

Anyway, many people I've talked to still love STM, despite the time thing. I'm much the same. But that's part of Chris Reeve's charm as Superman, he kind of makes us almost believe that he could do stuff like that.

I guess I could have included the acid from Superman III or perhaps moving the moon and rebuilding the great Wall with his eye-beams from Superman IV. I guess there's a thread for someone else to make.

Cheers.
 
I think those of us old enough to have seen the Donner film are overestimating the audience's of then having a fanboy mentality. I don't really think people of my parent's generation thought two wits about the ending. As illustrated already, there was a lot of nonsensical fantasy power stuff in the Superman comics and the TV show that they grew up with. The idea of Superman turning back time was probably not too outside the conception of the character that they had. It's we, the later fan generation after them that makes and issue of this.
 
I think those of us old enough to have seen the Donner film are overestimating the audience's of then having a fanboy mentality. I don't really think people of my parent's generation thought two wits about the ending. As illustrated already, there was a lot of nonsensical fantasy power stuff in the Superman comics and the TV show that they grew up with. The idea of Superman turning back time was probably not too outside the conception of the character that they had. It's we, the later fan generation after them that makes and issue of this.

Maybe, I don't even know if fanboy was a word back in 1978.

I agree that it didn't bother my dad at all (who took me to the film), but by then I was reading Superman comics, and to me it just seemed silly - the rest of the movie was awesome, but that was silly.

I guess for my dad, if Superman can fly and lift Western California, why can't he turn back time.

Tell you what though, if I watch youtube clips of the opening credits of Superman the Movie, or Reeve's first appearance as Supes....man it gives me chills (takes me back to being a kid in the cinema !)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCLi3_-iXHk


Cheers
 
Last edited:
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"