Oh If Only America Were More Enlightened.... Like Europe!

You do realize I've made other threads about Darfur that died quickly because they were boring to most. They didn't even reach 2 pages.

That thread was on its way to 15+ pages. So I don't regret even though some you morons think it makes them a moral authority while you have your thumbs up your asses.

I can't speak for everyone on the hype but I'd at least hope I had the testes to go to Darfur when I said I was going to Darfur.
 
Not really. But, I've gotta tell ya, you seem like you've got your head more in the clouds than most people like you I meet. I mean, here's the thing: the two ( your anarchism and abolitionism) are two completely different things. There's no thematic relation between the two besides the similar spelling, and to compare your version of anarchism (as you described) to abolitionism is something I should smack you for.
Well thematically I believe anarchy and abolitionism have the same intention. To allow people a greater degree of autonomous freedom despite systematic restraints. Just because you don't see a correlation doesn't mean jack s--t. It's your subjective opinion they don't have any thematic similarities. In no way is that opinion indisputable fact.

If you can't comprehend that but think you can comprehend the theoretical arguments of any reputable anarchist then you deserve to be pimp slapped by your masters.

It still seems you haven't read up on: Mikhail Bakunin, or his works, or the Spanish Civil War (and how it functioned during), or any of the concepts of anarch-collectivism other than the straw-man you're still holding up.
Dude you sound like a parrot when it comes to anarchy. You echo wiki pieces about anarch-collectivism as if you coined the phrase. If your ideas regarding anarchy are limited to the Spanish Civil War and wikipedia then you should be a high school history teacher instead of an active anarchist.

Anarchy isn't just about memorization or impressing strangers with wikipedia links.

In fact its purpose and methodology is different for every individual anarchist.
 
I can't speak for everyone on the hype but I'd at least hope I had the testes to go to Darfur when I said I was going to Darfur.

Well if the next day it was announced that 20,000 troops were being called to action to intervene you should be allowed to step back and reassess the situation. Not be taunted by people who never considered going, never donated a dime, and frankly don't care about anything except getting Hype brownie points from brown noses.
 
They left because you depended on them to improve threads instead of contributing something worthwhile yourself.
 
They left because you depended on them to improve threads instead of contributing something worthwhile yourself.
Nah. I wanted to comment on the ridiculously stupid assertions about Holland and legalized prostitution, but you and the other wankers had to fill page after page with basic verbal diarrhoea. At least be funny while you're filling up pages.
 
Fury are you trying to convince us all to travel to Amsterdam's to pay for sex....

...because you convinced me....
 
Well thematically I believe anarchy and abolitionism have the same intention. To allow people a greater degree of autonomous freedom despite systematic restraints. Just because you don't see a correlation doesn't mean jack s--t. It's your subjective opinion they don't have any thematic similarities. In no way is that opinion indisputable fact.

If you can't comprehend that but think you can comprehend the theoretical arguments of any reputable anarchist then you deserve to be pimp slapped by your masters.


Dude you sound like a parrot when it comes to anarchy. You echo wiki pieces about anarch-collectivism as if you coined the phrase. If your ideas regarding anarchy are limited to the Spanish Civil War and wikipedia then you should be a high school history teacher instead of an active anarchist.

Anarchy isn't just about memorization or impressing strangers with wikipedia links.

In fact its purpose and methodology is different for every individual anarchist.

No, see. The thing is, I've actually READ Mikhail Bakunin. I've read his articles, and in fact there's one rather long one up on my blog at:
http://www.anarchyton.blogspot.com

You should go back and take your own advice. Read the works of these people, Bakunin, Proudhon, Goldman, Bookchin. They're where its at.

And again, no. Much like atheism, anarchists do in fact have one main true thing about them. They believe there shouldn't be any government or hierarchal system. I mean, thats the entire basis of anarchism, and to an extent libertarianism. Probably the one exception to this is a fringe group we really don't acknowledge as anarchists, the anarcho-nationalists.
 
How Stupid are these people? These are the smart Europeans that a lot of you brag on. They want to get rid of the crime but not the hookers??? :woot: And I want the mice gone but I still want the cheese on my floor!

Seedy activity will attract seedy people. Wanna clean up crime Holland?? Get rid of prostitutes! News Flash!!!!!! Mobsters reeeally like hookers!!! They like drugs too. But Holland doesn't want to give up those things.

Well guess what? The problem will never go away. They want their cake and eat it too.

They don't want to get rid of the Hookers and Drugs cause it's the only thing that draws tourists to Amsterdam. if they would get rid of it they would experience a steep decline in tourism and people would have to close business. Ergo, get rid of the crime, but keep the thing that draws in the crowd. Even you can't be that dense to not get it.
 
b

Gabriele Pauli, who poses on her web site in motorcycle leathers, is standing for the leadership of Bavaria's Christian Social Union (CSU) -- sister party of Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservative Christian Democrats (CDU) -- in a vote next week.

You read the conservative there? You also read the christian there? It's a conservative Christian who is demanding this. In your country this would be a Republican, you nincompoop!

I'm just glad I voted our Liberal Party the last election. The CDU/CSU is killing this country. Christian Conservatism once again destroys a country. What else is new!:whatever:
 
Nah. I wanted to comment on the ridiculously stupid assertions about Holland and legalized prostitution, but you and the other wankers had to fill page after page with basic verbal diarrhoea. At least be funny while you're filling up pages.
aaaall righty then. :whatever:

It's just a random thread on a fanboy website dude.

as long as I'm reasonably entertained I'll post what I please.

If you're not amused then thats too bad. Nobody cares.
 
Fury are you trying to convince us all to travel to Amsterdam's to pay for sex....

...because you convinced me....
Don't get me wrong.

Amsterdam also has beautiful women everywhere who don't offer sex fantasies to anyone with money.

If you're into that kind of thing. :o
 
Don't get me wrong.

Amsterdam also has beautiful women everywhere who don't offer sex fantasies to anyone with money.

If you're into that kind of thing. :o

Into what kind of thing ? getting a girl without a C note ?:huh:
 
Listen, people are horny and if they can't pay for sex, they're going to take it. I don't want to be raped by some dude who could've had the chance to pay for sex.

Legalize prostitution. (Payed for by the women without fathers foundation.)


prostitution is legal in holland. silly.
 
No, see. The thing is, I've actually READ Mikhail Bakunin. I've read his articles, and in fact there's one rather long one up on my blog at:
http://www.anarchyton.blogspot.com

You should go back and take your own advice. Read the works of these people, Bakunin, Proudhon, Goldman, Bookchin. They're where its at.

And again, no. Much like atheism, anarchists do in fact have one main true thing about them. They believe there shouldn't be any government or hierarchal system. I mean, thats the entire basis of anarchism, and to an extent libertarianism. Probably the one exception to this is a fringe group we really don't acknowledge as anarchists, the anarcho-nationalists.

Anarchist may have long-term goals or short-term goals. They may be sociologically ambitious or content with just the personal revelations that come with individualist anarchy.

I don't think every anarchist believes there should be no form of government any time soon. That is far from realistic and a terribly impractical goal. Some just want to use anarchy as a catalyst for progressive change. This is a practical application for everyday anarchy IMO. Screw the snobby theoretical debates unless your prepared to apply and test those theories outside your home.
 
Into what kind of thing ? getting a girl without a C note ?:huh:

Turning down sex fantasy offers from beautiful women because they asked for a financial incentive.

It's not really a big deal.

Sally has big breast and a pretty smile.

Mike likes Sally and approaches her.

Sally doesn't really want to be tied down but has skilled hands.

Sally offers a hand and tit job to Mike for 80 bucks because she figures "why not".

Mike can either decline the offer due to outdated taboos/insufficient funds or get a happy ending with big breasted Sally with teh skilled hands whenever he feels like it.

^^^^What a terrible thing! Shame on Mike and Sally for even considering this. :whatever:

Nanny Laws both suck and blow but not in a good way. :down
 
That was a good story there blind_fury. Have you considered getting into the children's literature field?
 
aaaall righty then. :whatever:

It's just a random thread on a fanboy website dude.

as long as I'm reasonably entertained I'll post what I please.

If you're not amused then thats too bad. Nobody cares.
Then I guess you shouldn't ***** about anyone else not "contributing something worthwhile".
 
They don't want to get rid of the Hookers and Drugs cause it's the only thing that draws tourists to Amsterdam. if they would get rid of it they would experience a steep decline in tourism and people would have to close business. Ergo, get rid of the crime, but keep the thing that draws in the crowd. Even you can't be that dense to not get it.




Thatyou don't see the sad fact that "hookers and drugs" are the only things drawing people there is a problem in itself.

What a great way to get the best out of your citizens. :dry: Make them drug addicts and hookers. And keep them that way so that we can make money. Don't even consider other more legit and decent ways to attract commerce. Technology? Science? Manufacturing??? Naaaah.....we'll keep the human toilet thingie.


And I'm dense????
lol.gif
 
Turning down sex fantasy offers from beautiful women because they asked for a financial incentive.

It's not really a big deal.

Sally has big breast and a pretty smile.

Mike likes Sally and approaches her.

Sally doesn't really want to be tied down but has skilled hands.

Sally offers a hand and tit job to Mike for 80 bucks because she figures "why not".

Mike can either decline the offer due to outdated taboos/insufficient funds or get a happy ending with big breasted Sally with teh skilled hands whenever he feels like it.

^^^^What a terrible thing! Shame on Mike and Sally for even considering this. :whatever:

Nanny Laws both suck and blow but not in a good way. :down

So Mike's a chump ? Gotcha :up:
 
The argument could be made that if you legalise prostitution, you can chase away the organised criminals and make sure the girls are in safe environments without drugs and aren't being forced into it.

Prostitution is pretty much porno without the cameras.


So make it legal like it is in Nevada where there is absolutely zero organized crime.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"