Paramount may be re-birthing Rosemary's Baby

[terry78]

http://www.shocktillyoudrop.com/news/topnews.php?id=5008

Yeesh.

 

[Rac]

Aww, fck.

 

[tzarinna]

So, are they going to throw a little chump change to make this, then re-release the original on DVD, which people will clamor to buy...myself included?

 

[CrimsonMist]

i can only imagine the logic behind this one:

"Well, in the original, they didn't show the baby. So we have to remake it!"

 

[Motown Marvel]

truth be told, i thought the original film was boring. but thought it was a good story idea. so, i could be open to this.

 

[Lighthouse]

Platinum Dunes must be destroyed.

 

[Nightmare]

i can only imagine the logic behind this one:

"Well, in the original, they didn't show the baby. So we have to remake it!"

THEY DIDNT????

 

[Matt]

THEY DIDNT????

Heh, are you serious?

 

[Matt]

But yeah, this is going to suck. With remakes now-a-days they are not only going to show the baby, the baby is going to go on a massive slasher-movie killing spree right after birth.

 

[The Lizard]

The original movie is a classic, but it does have some really goofy parts in it by today's standards. The whole concept of a devil-spawned baby has been done so many times by now that I don't know why anyone would bother remaking it.

 

[Nightmare]

But yeah, this is going to suck. With remakes now-a-days they are not only going to show the baby, the baby is going to go on a massive slasher-movie killing spree right after birth.

LOL, that would indeed suck. What year did the original come out?

 

[Rac]

LOL, that would indeed suck. What year did the original come out?

'68