• Super Maintenance

    Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.

    Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.

    We apologize for the inconvenience.

Superman Returns Pmsl Superman returns timeless?

SatEL

Sidekick
Joined
May 18, 2006
Messages
2,833
Reaction score
0
Points
31
I seem to recall hearing that Singer stated this film would be timeless or ageless or something like that i mean did he actually believe that statement and what are you guys views on such a claim?
 
SatEL said:
I seem to recall hearing that Singer stated this film would be timeless or ageless or something like that i mean did he actually believe that statement and what are you guys views on such a claim?

Drugs are bad....mmmmkay.

But seriously, what is he supposed to say? I made this film, it's the most dissapointing movie in the last 20 years, showing no originality and a horrible story.
 
SatEL said:
I seem to recall hearing that Singer stated this film would be timeless or ageless or something like that i mean did he actually believe that statement and what are you guys views on such a claim?

I highly doubt that Singer would say something that stupid. :down
 
again, something that should of been stated in the complaints thread...
 
gimmen64 said:
I highly doubt that Singer would say something that stupid. :down
he did though... he said he wanted to make Metropolis with darker tones to give it a "retro" feel to it.
 
matthooper said:
Drugs are bad....mmmmkay.

But seriously, what is he supposed to say? I made this film, it's the most dissapointing movie in the last 20 years, showing no originality and a horrible story.


If drugs are bad then stop using them if you read what i said, I said "i seem to recall hearing" I didnt say it was fact if he didnt state such a thing then my apologises to singer fans.
 
Dude, I wasn't making that remark at you, I was making it at Singer if he actually said that. Calm down.

Did you read the rest of my post?
 
matthooper said:
Dude, I wasn't making that remark at you, I was making it at Singer if he actually said that. Calm down.

Did you read the rest of my post?

lol Oops my bad sorry about that its just these days this forum is torn between two sides and it can get preety confusing.


Forgive and forget?:D :)
 
SatEL said:
lol Oops my bad sorry about that its just these days this forum is torn between two sides and it can get preety confusing.


Forgive and forget?:D :)

No problem.

There are two sides, the side that didn't like the movie, and the side that deludes themselves into liking it.
 
It is largely timeless. This movie won't date as he used such a plethora of imagery from different eras. Singer succeeded.
 
I disagree... All he did was make it look like Gotham City with the overuse of black in the city
 
kakarot069 said:
I disagree... All he did was make it look like Gotham City with the overuse of black in the city

What part of this looked like Gotham city??? Gotham was much darker and there is much more to a film being timeless than just the city.
 
he made a very dark and dull looking city by overusing grey shades and black shades...

You want to make a timeless city, do what Peter Jackson did In King Kong
 
kakarot069 said:
he made a very dark and dull looking city by overusing grey shades and black shades...

You want to make a timeless city, do what Peter Jackson did In King Kong

By re-creating early 1900s New York City?
 
BMM said:
By re-creating early 1900s New York City?
no, by using color, filters, and certain hues to give the city a real "retro" feel.
 
Singer said he something like he wanted to make a good movie that in the future that someone would say after watching it, that was a good movie!
 
If you want something to be timeless, it also needs to be placeless, but the overhead shot of Metropolis actually being Manhattan island ruins any sense of that.

Same thing I felt when watching Batman Begins. I was really digging what they created for Gotham until I saw the famous Chicago Times tower.

Directors, please, don't let famous imagery ruin your movie!!!
 
Uhhhh I see NO similiarity to Gotham. None at all.

And what the hell does PMSL mean?
 
Gotham is dark and dull, and Singer's Metropolis was dark and dull as well... you couldn't see anything. Hell, you couldn't even see Superman's suit at night.


At least you could in STM
 
kakarot069 said:
Gotham is dark and dull, and Singer's Metropolis was dark and dull as well... you couldn't see anything. Hell, you couldn't even see Superman's suit at night.


At least you could in STM

I don't think so. I think the interiors were bright and detailed, and you really didn't see much of the exteriors, except for the front of the DP, and it was pretty bright as well.
 
Timeless was one of the first things I actually said after seeing it to describe it to friends and family.

Superman Returns was a beautiful film.
 
it dosn't have a timeless feel at all... it felt like Gothem, just slightly brighter
 
SatEL said:
I seem to recall hearing that Singer stated this film would be timeless or ageless or something like that i mean did he actually believe that statement and what are you guys views on such a claim?


1zzrxpg.jpg



:):up:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,243
Messages
21,929,078
Members
45,725
Latest member
alwaysgrateful9
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"