Prove Your Point: Is our country moving toward Socialism?

Venezuela Chavez says "Comrade" Obama more left-wing

CARACAS (Reuters) - Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez said on Tuesday that he and Cuban ally Fidel Castro risk being more conservative than U.S. President Barack Obama as Washington prepares to take control of General Motors Corp.

During one of Chavez's customary lectures on the "curse" of capitalism and the bonanzas of socialism, the Venezuelan leader made reference to GM's bankruptcy filing, which is expected to give the U.S. government a 60 percent stake in the 100-year-old former symbol of American might.

"Hey, Obama has just nationalized nothing more and nothing less than General Motors. Comrade Obama! Fidel, careful or we are going to end up to his right," Chavez joked on a live television broadcast.

During a decade in government, Chavez has nationalized most of Venezuela's key economic sectors, including multibillion dollar oil projects, often via joint ventures with the private sector that give the state a 60 percent controlling stake.

Obama has vowed to quickly sell off General Motors once the auto giant is back on its feet, but the government will initially control the company after a $30 billion injection of taxpayer funds.

Chavez, a vehement critic of the U.S. "empire," has toned down his rhetoric since Obama took office in January and the two men shook hands during a summit in Trinidad and Tobago in April.

(Reporting by Enrique Andres Pretel; Writing by Frank Jack Daniel, Editing by Jackie Frank)

http://www.reuters.com/article/Obam...edName=ObamaEconomy&virtualBrandChannel=10441
 
Comics with the PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION that seems to have been forgotten,...

attachment.php


AND...

attachment.php



Kel?

My primary belief as to why I do not think we are moving toward socialism is the FACT that we have economically been where we are now as a country,.. and we did pretty much the same thing we did before to save ourselves, but with a lot less fanfare and gnashing of teeth.


Peace.


I believe we are moving toward Socialism, maybe not at the rate that many believe, but we are moving that direction IMO. I ALSO BELIEVE, that this has been happening at a quickening rate SINCE 2001....I do not believe this is something new just now coming with the Obama administration.
 
I agree Kel, except I think it is happening quicker than we think. The fact it has powdered sugar on it doesn't mean it's not Socialism.
 
I think it is a more of a case of denial. Hate the label but love policy and use of it.
 
I agree Kel, except I think it is happening quicker than we think. The fact it has powdered sugar on it doesn't mean it's not Socialism.

IMO, the world is on an economic spectrum...

Command Economies at one end, and Market Economies at the other....

There is no true Market Economy left, and we are still closer to it than other countries......I think it will take (if that is his plan) both terms to get us to a few steps from the middle of the spectrum. If it looks to be happening quicker, and people realize it and stand up, he very well may not see the second term, and that is where we will be on the spectrum for awhile....all of this is just speculation on my part....
 
America moved down by a rank in the economic freedom index. New Zealand is more free market than America now.
 
We have a 31 year old auto czar to dismantle the big auto companies and the senate is holding hearings on why GM picked to close those certain branches as compared to others. Wonderful:dry:
 
Socialism leads us to choosing young people for positions in government?
 
We have a 31 year old auto czar to dismantle the big auto companies and the senate is holding hearings on why GM picked to close those certain branches as compared to others. Wonderful:dry:
You mean Obama appointed someone as Auto Czar to "fix" the Auto Companies that doesn't know a thing about the Auto Industry? Gasp! Say it isn't so!
 
Socialism leads us to choosing young people for positions in government?
No, having an auto czar is. The fact that he is 31 with no experience in the auto industry is scary.
 
It would be comedic if the czar's directives end up making the companies even less profitable. And I am willing to bet on it
 
I liked it better when I had it after Comic Con two years ago :o


:oldrazz:
 
US government seeks to rein in executive pay
Democrats want to push administration on US corporate pay strategies

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Obama administration is taking a half-step toward taming U.S. executive pay. Some lawmakers prefer a fuller stride.

Democrats on the House Financial Services Committee said Thursday the administration's efforts to hector the private sector into reining in executive pay might not go far enough.

The administration contends that excessive compensation contributed to the U.S. financial crisis, but rejects direct intervention in corporate pay decisions.

Instead, the administration plans to seek legislation that would try to rein in compensation at publicly traded companies through nonbinding shareholder votes and less management influence on pay decisions.

"I do differ with the administration in that hope springs eternal and their position seems to be that if we strengthen the compensation committees we will do better," said the committee chairman, Rep. Barney Frank, a Democrat.

Rep. Brad Sherman, a Democrat, said that instead of giving shareholders a nonbinding voice on pay, their votes should be binding on boards of directors.

Democrats and administration officials agreed that companies across the private sector need to adjust compensation practices to avoid damaging the economy.

Gene Sperling, a counselor to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, said administration guidelines call on all publicly held companies to link compensation to long-term performance, not short-term gains.

"We believe that compensation practices must be better aligned with long-term value and prudent risk management at all firms, and not just for the financial services industry," Sperling said.

The committee also heard from officials from the Federal Reserve and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

While the administration has approached the issue with caution, a top Republican said the plans amounted to "incessant government intervention."

"The president cannot continue his heavy-handed meddling in the private sector and expect it to function, much less flourish," said Rep. Tom Price, chairman of the Republican Study Committee.

Alabama Rep. Spencer Bachus, the top Republican on the committee, added: "We need to get government out of businesses."

The administration has drawn a sharp line between the overall corporate world and those institutions that have tapped the government's $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program.

On Wednesday, it set pay limits on companies that receive TARP assistance, with the toughest restrictions aimed at seven recipients of "exceptional assistance." They are Citigroup Inc., Bank of America Corp., General Motors Corp., Chrysler LLC, American International Group Inc., GMAC LLC and Chrysler Financial.

The regulations limit top executives of companies that receive TARP funds to bonuses of no more than one-third of their annual salaries.

The administration named Kenneth Feinberg, a lawyer who oversaw payments to families of Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attack victims, as a "special master" with power to reject pay plans he deems excessive at the seven companies with the biggest injections of public money. Feinberg also would have authority to review compensation for the top 100 salaried employees at those companies.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Administration-Rein-in-pay-apf-15500519.html/print

Checkmate.
 
http://www.foxtoledo.com/dpp/news/local/wupw_Residents_upset_over_parking_violations_061509

Now, common city workers can ticket you. A total disregard of the US Constituion, State Constitution, and City & County Charter. And what's sad, this is going to pop up and many communities and citizens will lay down for this because they are apathetic.

Systematically, eroding and taking back rights, a little at a time. That above is a gestapo move by the Mayor. You all know where this country is heading, but deny that it is because this is what many of you want.
 
ABC TURNS PROGRAMMING OVER TO OBAMA; NEWS TO BE ANCHORED FROM INSIDE WHITE HOUSE

Tue Jun 16 2009 08:45:10 ET

On the night of June 24, the media and government become one, when ABC turns its programming over to President Obama and White House officials to push government run health care -- a move that has ignited an ethical firestorm!

Highlights on the agenda:

ABCNEWS anchor Charlie Gibson will deliver WORLD NEWS from the Blue Room of the White House.

The network plans a primetime special -- 'Prescription for America' -- originating from the East Room, exclude opposing voices on the debate.

MORE

Late Monday night, Republican National Committee Chief of Staff Ken McKay fired off a complaint to the head of ABCNEWS:

Dear Mr. Westin:

As the national debate on health care reform intensifies, I am deeply concerned and disappointed with ABC's astonishing decision to exclude opposing voices on this critical issue on June 24, 2009. Next Wednesday, ABC News will air a primetime health care reform “town hall” at the White House with President Barack Obama. In addition, according to an ABC News report, GOOD MORNING AMERICA, WORLD NEWS, NIGHTLINE and ABC’s web news “will all feature special programming on the president’s health care agenda.” This does not include the promotion, over the next 9 days, the president’s health care agenda will receive on ABC News programming.

Today, the Republican National Committee requested an opportunity to add our Party's views to those of the President's to ensure that all sides of the health care reform debate are presented. Our request was rejected. I believe that the President should have the ability to speak directly to the America people. However, I find it outrageous that ABC would prohibit our Party's opposing thoughts and ideas from this national debate, which affects millions of ABC viewers.

In the absence of opposition, I am concerned this event will become a glorified infomercial to promote the Democrat agenda. If that is the case, this primetime infomercial should be paid for out of the DNC coffers. President Obama does not hold a monopoly on health care reform ideas or on free airtime. The President has stated time and time again that he wants a bipartisan debate. Therefore, the Republican Party should be included in this primetime event, or the DNC should pay for your airtime.

Respectfully,
Ken McKay
Republican National Committee
Chief of Staff

MORE

ABCNEWS Senior Vice President Kerry Smith on Tuesday responded to the RNC complaint, saying it contained 'false premises':

"ABCNEWS prides itself on covering all sides of important issues and asking direct questions of all newsmakers -- of all political persuasions -- even when others have taken a more partisan approach and even in the face of criticism from extremes on both ends of the political spectrum. ABCNEWS is looking for the most thoughtful and diverse voices on this issue.

"ABCNEWS alone will select those who will be in the audience asking questions of the president. Like any programs we broadcast, ABC News will have complete editorial control. To suggest otherwise is quite unfair to both our journalists and our audience."

Developing...

http://www.drudgereport.com/flashaot.htm
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"