Superman Returns Re: The Offical Jason Appreciation Thread

MR. MOVIEMAN said:
even if he lost his powers during Superman 2 , he still a whole different species and science taught us two different Speciecs can not mate , or else we would have Catdogs or Liontigers or Humanbees
Ligers.....lol......
 
MR. MOVIEMAN said:
even if he lost his powers during Superman 2 , he still a whole different species and science taught us two different Speciecs can not mate , or else we would have Catdogs or Liontigers or Humanbees

Umm science heard your little debate and flipped you off...

The Liger, Captain Observant...

liger.png
 
Sigh.......pre-crisis. Those were the days. When Batman had a rainbow colored Batsuit at his disposal, and Superman had begun his superhero career as a 1 year old known as Superbaby..........sigh....those were the days.
 
ChrisBaleBatman said:
Sigh.......pre-crisis. Those were the days. When Batman had a rainbow colored Batsuit at his disposal, and Superman had begun his superhero career as a 1 year old known as Superbaby..........sigh....those were the days.
rainbow colored batsuit? lol....
 
Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex is more or less tongue-in-cheek. There's really absolutely no reason Superman's strength and invulnerability would prevent him from having a child, much less turn Lois into puree in the heat of passion. I can't believe I'm writing this sentence, but a Mr. Universe contestant wouldn't ejaculate any more forcefully than a 130 lb. weakling. And just like Superman doesn't tear his Clark Kent clothes while just walking around or trying to catch a cab, there's no reason to believe Superman can't stop himself from using all of his strength and humping her to death.

As for the genetic compatibility, the liger analogy is a good one, actually. The chimp and human, bee and human, cat and dog ones, though, are disingenuous. Kryptonians, although fantastically-evolved in some ways (not necessarily an evolution upwards-- it may very well be an evolution sideways... like the tiger and lion, again. Hell, probably not even THAT different), look 100% "human." I'd place bets on them being able to breed with Earthlings just on face value before it'd ever occur to me that they were completely genetically-incompatible. It's not like this is a question of a human being and a tentacled, green space-jellyfish. Being able to soak up the yellow rays of the sun might just be, on a genetic level, like carrying a gene for having red hair. No reason to assume it would hamper genetic compatiblity with a race of beings who, when you get down to basics and forego societal influences, look and feel and behave just like the same species.

I *****ing love nerdery.
 
rainbow colored batsuit? lol....

Yeah.

Superbaby, and a Black Lois Lane are also parts of the package. Thos bastards were really smoking some good **** back in the day.
 
there are some stories out there in the Superman universe where Kryptonians have come to earth and mated with humans

In fact they have used such a story in Smallville too.

I think that Humans and Kryptonians must share a huge amount of DNA, just look at them. They are structurally the same. Kryptonians power under a yellow sun comes from thousands of years of genetic engineering which they did to improve their race. It has nothing to do with being an entirely different species.

It's entirely possible that Kryptonians and Humans are one and the same, but one were a far more advanced group of peoples
 
On Sv, a kryptonian came to Earth, mated with a human, and also brought these green rocks, that changed the people into shapeshifters/werewolves. So Clark can have children. Unless if he was on Krypton and he couldn't have children their, then he has a malfunction of some sorts.
 
On Sv, a kryptonian came to Earth, mated with a human, and also brought these green rocks, that changed the people into shapeshifters/werewolves. So Clark can have children. Unless if he was on Krypton and he couldn't have children their, then he has a malfunction of some sorts.
 
It would be kinda cool down the line you find out Jason starts gaining powers, but has no resistance to Kryptonite.
 
Nivek said:
It would be kinda cool down the line you find out Jason starts gaining powers, but has no resistance to Kryptonite.
Nah, everyone needs a weakness.
 
Monstera said:
Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex is more or less tongue-in-cheek. There's really absolutely no reason Superman's strength and invulnerability would prevent him from having a child, much less turn Lois into puree in the heat of passion. I can't believe I'm writing this sentence, but a Mr. Universe contestant wouldn't ejaculate any more forcefully than a 130 lb. weakling. And just like Superman doesn't tear his Clark Kent clothes while just walking around or trying to catch a cab, there's no reason to believe Superman can't stop himself from using all of his strength and humping her to death.

As for the genetic compatibility, the liger analogy is a good one, actually. The chimp and human, bee and human, cat and dog ones, though, are disingenuous. Kryptonians, although fantastically-evolved in some ways (not necessarily an evolution upwards-- it may very well be an evolution sideways... like the tiger and lion, again. Hell, probably not even THAT different), look 100% "human." I'd place bets on them being able to breed with Earthlings just on face value before it'd ever occur to me that they were completely genetically-incompatible. It's not like this is a question of a human being and a tentacled, green space-jellyfish. Being able to soak up the yellow rays of the sun might just be, on a genetic level, like carrying a gene for having red hair. No reason to assume it would hamper genetic compatiblity with a race of beings who, when you get down to basics and forego societal influences, look and feel and behave just like the same species.

I *****ing love nerdery.

Ok sorry but you couldn't be more wrong the man of steel woman of kleenex analogy is right on the money.
while he may be able to not hump lois to death ejacuation is an INVOLUNTARY reflex and sorry but supes would do it at kryptoinan force which would kill lois.
Its not a matter of DNA compatibility I am sure that is believable for kryptionians and humans to mate but the sex part would be death to the human, maybe had she been artifically insuminated????

Your nerdery is no match for Kevin Smiths sorry nice try though but his write up on this explains it in full detail wik it if you want.

And finally how do you all just accept this garbage???? I mean I see several posters in this thread who all but blew a gasket because in X3 they had the nervre to assume Angel stowed aboard the Xjet yet you take this which is ten times worse and try to justify the complete lack of an explaination from the writers directors???? double standard much....:(
 
NateGray said:
Ok sorry but you couldn't be more wrong the man of steel woman of kleenex analogy is right on the money.
while he may be able to not hump lois to death ejacuation is an INVOLUNTARY reflex and sorry but supes would do it at kryptoinan force which would kill lois.
Its not a matter of DNA compatibility I am sure that is believable for kryptionians and humans to mate but the sex part would be death to the human, maybe had she been artifically insuminated????

Your nerdery is no match for Kevin Smiths sorry nice try though but his write up on this explains it in full detail wik it if you want.

And finally how do you all just accept this garbage???? I mean I see several posters in this thread who all but blew a gasket because in X3 they had the nervre to assume Angel stowed aboard the Xjet yet you take this which is ten times worse and try to justify the complete lack of an explaination from the writers directors???? double standard much....:(

Well he does have a son, so if I'm keeping score it's 1-0. You're down 1 and it's the only point.
 
MoreCowbell said:
Well he does have a son, so if I'm keeping score it's 1-0. You're down 1 and it's the only point.

Ummm huh so bad writing with no explinations is just ok because its SR but if this was X3 it gets trashed non stop yep double standard alright....

and your 0 to 1 crap yeh let me see if I care..... yep I sure don't
 
NateGray said:
Ummm huh so bad writing with no explinations is just ok because its SR but if this was X3 it gets trashed non stop yep double standard alright....

and your 0 to 1 crap yeh let me see if I care..... yep I sure don't

It's not bad writing. There was never a situation where Supes was shown NOT to be able to reproduce with humans (other then Kevin Smith's mallrats, where the lines are meant as a joke. As a matter of fact, go look up Son of Superman (an elseworld tale, but still).

Fact is there is no evidence to back up your claims. You're not really arguing Superman's ability to have kids, but for X3 not being crap. You're an X3 apologist trying to stick it to SR it seems (may not be true, but you're coming off that way). Anyway, for fun, here are the top 10 animal hybrids..

http://www.hemmy.net/2006/06/19/top-10-hybrid-animals/

I like the Zony...
 
MoreCowbell said:
It's not bad writing. There was never a situation where Supes was shown NOT to be able to reproduce with humans (other then Kevin Smith's mallrats, where the lines are meant as a joke. As a matter of fact, go look up Son of Superman (an elseworld tale, but still).

Fact is there is no evidence to back up your claims. You're not really arguing Superman's ability to have kids, but for X3 not being crap. You're an X3 apologist trying to stick it to SR it seems (may not be true, but you're coming off that way). Anyway, for fun, here are the top 10 animal hybrids..

http://www.hemmy.net/2006/06/19/top-10-hybrid-animals/

I like the Zony...

Umm wrong I thought X3 was as decent as the other Xfilms (BTW nice try twisting this to make is seem like I am just a X3 lover and Sr hater smart move when your argument has no legs) but I just love how stuff not explained in SR is ok yet stuff not explained in X3 was hack writing nice try to back out of that double standard to bad you failed.


Hack writing is not explaining something like superman having a kid it is bad writing and it wa SII that set the precident that superman could not have sex with a mortal woman....you know that one singer uses as vauge history....
And again I never said there was a DNA compatibility issue between kryptionians and humans.
As for that link LMAO yeh we BREED them they did not mate naturally except the ones that are from similar species like the dog's and wolves so did we breed superman and lois....
 
HEY uh....

001_TheKid1.jpg
ANYTHING'S POSSIBLE...


;) this was by superfever, not me, you all knew that though i bet.
 
wait, let me see if I got this right :D:D:D

THe kid belongs to Supes??? BAWWWWWWWWWAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH



WHAT A LOAD OF BS! FIRE SINGER!!! He's degraded the Superman mythos!!!

Damn you singer, damn you :D
 
The child is not Richard's, but rather, Superman's - the child is 5 years old and was born shortly after Superman left the planet.


BAWWWWWWAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Man Im heart broken :(
 
romeogbs19 said:
From the TIME Magazine review: It's familial--the bond of two sets of fathers and sons: Jor-El and Superman, then Superman and Jason. Each parent tells his child that he must surpass the old man's feats, improve on Dad's legend.


NOOOO!!! :eek: :eek: :eek:

Why Singer??? Why did you ahve to do this too us?!?!?!
 
I think I will see how it plays out in the movie before I ask for Singer's head on a platter.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,346
Messages
22,088,510
Members
45,887
Latest member
Elchido
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"