Fear of god said:
I don't buy that stuff. It's more coincidence than anything else, I think.
[rant] Anyway, yes, Finger deserves
equal credit, but NOT as much as some people try to give him. Not to mention the fact that he let himself get ripped off. If you let yourself get ripped off, you kind of deserve what you get, anyway.
The problem with the "Finger fanatics" is that they try to take away credit from Bob. News flash: Finger is NOT the "true" creator of Batman. Bob Kane invented Batman and Finger made
revisions. Key revisions? Hell yes. Without Finger, Batman probably wouldn't have gone anywhere. But you have to be fair, and you have to be accurate.
All this stuff about Finger is a bias. People have made Kane out to be a bigger a**hole than he really was. Toward the end of his life, he revealed the truth and admitted that Finger got srcewed out of his credit.
But it wasn't Bob being a jerk. Bob created the character and had already submitted it to DC. So he was the only one who got official credit. That's how it worked in those days. Sorry to say it, but Bob Kane wasn't the ******* everyone wants to make him out to be. Not to mention that if Finger really felt he deserved co-credit for Batman, he could have taken Bob/DC to court like Siegal and Shuster did for Superman. If you let yourself get walked on, you partially deserve it.
This "raise the Finger" idiocy really gets on my nerves. Yes, the guy
deserves equal credit, but the morons here carry the crusade way. Too. Far. Finger only helped shape the chracter, just as anyone else who wrote Batman for all these years. It's not Finger's (or Kane's) fault that the writers went unappreciated back then, that's how things were. And proclaiming that Bob Kane can "burn in Hell" is immature and ignorant. When you make a statement like that, it only shows that you don't care about the truth. The truth is that Kane
created Batman. That will never change, and sorry to say, Finger fans, it
is the truth. Kane wasn't the nicest person until the time B89 came out (When he started giving Bill his due credit), but overreacting and trying to insinuate that Kane was the devil is just plain rediculous.
Now, the Kane estate refusing to give Finger
any credit (Which happened with the BB 2 Disc SE's pack-in comic recently) is truly pathetic, especially since Bob Kane himself was quick to acknowledge Finger in his last ten or so years.
But yeah. Kane created the Batman character and submitted him. THEN Finger made revisions. Thus, technically, Finger doesn't deserve co-credit, but it'd be generous. Kane's only true crime is taking credit for it all for all the years that he did, up until '89. [/rant]