Ridley Scott's The Martian

Rate the Movie

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1


Results are only viewable after voting.
I've got a long plane ride next week. I'll probably read the book before seeing the movie. I'm all for Ridley making a solid movie again, as his last few have been somewhat mediocre. It's a numbers game with Ridley, as I've said before. Just like Woody Allen, if you make one movie a year some will be amazing and some will be lackluster.
 
James Berardinelli isnt allowed to post his review until next week sometime, but he tweeted that it's the best film of the year so far.
 
Probably haven't been this excited for a film all year. Looking good so far.
 
I've got a long plane ride next week. I'll probably read the book before seeing the movie. I'm all for Ridley making a solid movie again, as his last few have been somewhat mediocre. It's a numbers game with Ridley, as I've said before. Just like Woody Allen, if you make one movie a year some will be amazing and some will be lackluster.

Spielberg has been as rapidly prolific as Scott in various times of his career and has been much, much more consistently good. Spielberg is of course an outlier in almost any group but the point remains, Scott is simply just not that reliable of a storyteller.
 
So, it looks like Ridley Scott is back?
 
^ :funny: Basically. But in the meantime I'm just going to go enjoy this one.
 
I'm extremely pleased this is getting a great response. Drew Goddard ya'll. And Scott of course who can seize the opportunity to create something great if the script is there.
 
Just take a look at the writers, it ain't happening. Why didn't he get Goddard to write Paradise Lost as well?:argh:

Michael Green, who was one of the five writers attached to Green Lantern movie ?

Yeah, not a great choice but still, that movie suffered more due to too many cooks in the kitchen and lack of management and direction but I would like to give him some benefit of doubt.
 
Green ain't bad. It depends entirely on the quality of those initial drafts and what Scott sees in them. Scott said himself life's a lot easier if there's a great script already there. I think the headache aspect of getting it right for him is where the quality of the shooting script may suffer.
 
I knew that water thing was gonna come back to bite this movie, haha.
 
I'm starting to think that Nasa's announcement was planned to coincide with the films release. If Scott was shown photos a couple of months back it's highly possible NASA sat on the finding until the release of the film this week. Brilliant move if that's the case.
 
if only drew penned prometheus
instead of lind..
 
As for those asking why Scott didn't work with Goddard sooner, basically Goddard was attached to this film before Scott was and might have directed it himself but moved on to working on the Daredevil show...which he then dropped to work on a Sinister Six movie that isn't happening. Not the wisest chain of decisions.
 
Scott is a brilliant filmmaker. He has supervised The Martian with real science engineering effects.
 
Went to see it today. it's was very good and Sir Ridley is certainly back. Could've done with a bit more time spent with the Ares crew though as I thought we'd get more of them than what we got.

8/10
 
It will be great to come out of the theater after seeing a good Ridley Scott film again. It has been too damn long. Cameron Diaz making love to a windshield and Bardem with his jersey shore outfit, white face egyptians. I need this, mayne.

Sir RIdley is nostalgia for me.


madmendon.gif
 
Off to see this now. Review in a couple of hours.
 
It's Ridley Scott's best film in years. A pure, sci-fi epic adventure.
 
Just watched it, fantastic movie and i just gotta say.

I was disappointed that Sean Bean lived in this film, that man is a walking, talking spoiler.
 
Alrightly, just got back from seeing it, review as follows.

With consecutive years of science based space dramas with Gravity and Interstellar the question was going into this film could The Martian follow in the footsteps of its piers and could it live up to the book which kept science enthusiasts on the edge of their seat. The answer is a resounding yes to both. Ridley Scott has made a return to form after a very much hit or miss decade of film making, dealing what is not only one of his most entertaining films in many years, but surprisingly, is without doubt the most upbeat and uplifting film he's every created.

Those who read the book will know a large chunk of the story is about astronaut Mark Watney and his MacGuyver like intellect figuring out how to solve endless problems to stay alive on the inhospitable Mars, and whilst the film version does delve into that it's not nearly as detailed as it is written on the page. Many of the problems Watney encounters and the solutions he comes up with from the book are only touched on or are overlooked altogether, and the science and technical details used in the film isn't nearly as in depth. But this is not to the films detriment, there's still enough science and ingenuity from Watney and enough problems for him to overcome to still make the journey feel like a struggle. This film is less about the problems Watney encounters and more about just getting him home.

Matt Damon is well cast as Watney. Whilst the character retains many of the humorous traits as the character in the book there's more depth to the film interpretation, Damon brings the right balance of humour and seriousness to the role. The supporting cast is well balanced and a surprising amount of time is devoted to the goings on at NASA as well as the crew of the Hermes spaceship who are on their way back to Earth. Those expecting a Cast Away type of one man show best leave that idea at the door, as much as Damon is the star it is very much an ensemble film. Whilst no-one stands out in particular the entire supporting cast feel as if they are perfectly cast for their particular roles.

In terms of cinematography Ridley Scott has made Mars look beautiful, something that I don't think has been done well on film before. I'm generally not one for 3D movies but I'm half tempted to watch this again in 3D to get a more immersive experience. There's not a lot in terms of special effects, this isn't an action movie by any means so anyone going in expecting explosions is probably going to be disappointed, this is much more science drama than science fiction.

The big question in the end is is film adaptation as good as the book? Yes, but in a different way. It's like hearing an awesome cover version of your favourite song, just as good as the original but done in a new and different way. That's what The Martian is, it's not the edge of your seat tension builder like the book is, instead it's about people working together and doing what humans do best in times crisis, using our brains and ingenuity to solve problems.

Ridley's best film in years, uplifting, a great performance from the entire cast, and a win for science. I don't recall feeling this good walking out of a film in quite some time. A well deserved 8/10.

Oh, and NASA, lets do this thing. Let's get our ass to Mars.
 
So happy this is getting such good reviews. I've been a fan of Drew Goddard since he came on as a newbie writer on S7 of Buffy and wrote the best eps of the season (imo). I feel like a proud mama right now, lol.
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"