Scooby Doo Meets Batman

Sam Fisher

Heavy Meddle
Joined
Sep 26, 2004
Messages
14,743
Reaction score
2
Points
31
sdbatmancover.jpg


Yeah, these two episodes were awasome.



sdbatman3.jpg

sdbatman.png

sdbatman2.png



Not to mention Batman took his pants off:D
batmanj.png


And...

:yay:
 
Last edited:
I used to have The Caped Crusader Caper (the episode with Professor Flakey and his flying suit) on VHS and would watch it pretty much every day as a kid. When wandering around Wal-Mart I found the same episode on DVD and got it for my nephew, Jojo (aged 3 and a half). He loves it and his mom says he watches it on Repeat.

It's just so cool to share that litttle awesome piece of my childhood with him and see him have the same experience.
 
I really don't get all this nostalgia for something that was pretty much crap. Now, that's not just me as an adult saying this, I realise it was for kids, but I've thought it awful ever since I first it when I WAS a kid. Just poorly animated, acted, written, with extremely poor quality control, just about every other frame something was wrong with B+R'S costumes. This pretty much goes for ANY Scooby-Doo episode, but as a Bat-fan, I was especially bummed out.
 
Last edited:
I really don't get al this nostalgia for something that was pretty much crap. Now, that's not just me as an adult saying this, I realise it was for kids, but I've thought it awful ever since I first it when I WAS a kid. Just poorly animated, acted, written, with extremely poor quality control, just about every other frame something was wrong with B+R'S costumes. This pretty much goes for ANY Scooby-Doo episode, but as a Bat-fan, I was especially bummed out.

You thought all that at age 5??
 
Unless Adam West is doing the voice, this ain't worth my time.:o
 
I think it's kinda fun. I agree the quality is bad but I loved it as a little kid.
 
You thought all that at age 5??

Where in my post did I say I was 5?
I'll tell you - nowhere.
I was born in 1954. The ScoobyDoo/Batman thing was , what, 1966-67? I was at least 12 years old, and yes, that's exactly what I thought at the time, still do.
 
Last edited:
This was 1972/73. And the same could be said for any cartoon back then{Transformers "cough"}
 
Yeah, the Scooby Doo movies were 1972, wich was when this team up was. I think by that time Bathead was beyond the demographic for these cartoons. I was born in '73 and loved this as a kid. I laughed at the animation goofs, but I didnt care, I was a kid.
 
True enough, I guess I wasn't the target audience, but I still say it was poor quality all the way around, and just because it was aimed at kids is no excuse for making a sloppy, badly made cartoon. That attitude, that something doesn't have to be of real good quality because it's aimed at kids, always bugged me, and to me showed laziness and a disrespectful attitude towards children on the part of those that produce the stuff. If you as a kid liked it, well, that's fine, you like what you like after all, but it's still crap.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"