The Thor prologue was mostly digital, and is first and foremost visual. Directing actual scenes (with actors, characters, dialogue, etc.), let alone a movie, in live-action it is not.
Two very different animals, def.
I think so. Even with motion capture your still getting the performances you want and creating the scene down to small detail later on. Alot of animation directors usually put out fantastic live action work, and if they don't it's usually the scripts fault. It's different but there are plenty of the same major rules.
Having read the script as well, it definitely has it's own personality. I think alot of that will be a joint effort. When it comes to Reynolds performnace in the role I'm not worried at all. I think he can play it in his sleep.
The one issue I'm kinda worried about is finding the balance between the dramatic tragic stuff and the humor. A major problem for Deadpool in general. I think the script is near perfection, and they are definitely going to the right books for influence with the Kelly run. But I do remember a few scenes in the script I would have liked them to play a bit more heavy. Mainly the stuff with Nessa and the Workshop.
P.S.: Is it just me or has Deadpool lost some popularity on the boards? Only one topic for this, yet look at the Black Panther and Inhumans sections.
I'd love an official poster to have "Deadpool: silly sub-title" or Deadpool: Dawn of the rise of the sub-title" or something poking fun at all the sub-titles of late.
"It's a wholly original idea we came up with, but the movie is an origin story and Deadpool has a reasonably well-known origin so we riffed off that," Reese says. "We didn't do it precisely from the comics, but we used a lot of the elements."
"We used characters from the Deadpool universe as well, like Blind Al and Ajax, plus there are some new characters -- Mega Sonic Teenage Warhead, she's fun -- and then Colossus, a classic X-Men character, is also in the script. We had fun building that universe out."