Should any of these things be addressed?

How is what i said a fallacy? He flies, he's super strong, he's handsome, muscular, has perfect or nearly perfect morals, and intelligent.

So basically, he's not human because humans always have flaws, MAJOR flaws. If I'm wrong, tell me one of Superman's major flaws. He is not more human than we are, humans have flaws, he's what a perfect human would be, he's closer to Jesus or some other god than he is to a human.
 
I don't think Superman's "flawlessness" (I don't read the comics so I don't know of he's actually perfect all the time) has anything to do with biology. I always assumed it was due more to his upbringing. He's basically just a really nice guy, which doesn't make him inhuman in any way.
 
Read Red Son. That's a good example of what would/could happen if superman had landed somewhere else other than Kansas.
Personally, I don't think him being Kryptonarian has anymore to do with how he behaves or how he treats mankind than his upbringing in Kansas.
 
if its an established superman movie here are some things i think should be addressed right away for the general audience.

-is it a sequel to superman returns? which would also make people wonder, is superman's kid in this movie?
-how far into superman's career does this take place?

is there anything else that should be addressed soon as possible so people won't be confused?
 
def what ever type of film it is we need to know right off the bat/during production-first promotions for the film that this is not donner/singer's superman and its an all new and different take.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"