Should democrats cut funding to stop the troop surge?

Should the Democrats cut funding to stop the troop surge?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.

blind_fury

Avenger
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Messages
13,584
Reaction score
0
Points
31
If they do, they will be blamed for failure in Iraq and accused of hurting the troops on the frontline.

If they don't they'll be accused of not sticking to their convictions and being all talk with no action.

It's a lose-lose situation. What should they do?
 
i don't think they should cut funding because they could inturn truly affect the troops that are already over there.
i just think they should come up with a way to where no more are sent.
then there wont have to be an INCREASE in spending and maybe we can start to trickle some of those people back to their homes.
 
negative if you gonna send troops might as well fund them..its too late
 
negative if you gonna send troops might as well fund them..its too late
what's too late?
it's never too late!
the only time it's too late is when someone becomes a zombie.
then they're just not thinking rationally. all they want is flesh and brains.
til then, you can ALWAYS change the amount of troops being sent.
 
what's too late?
it's never too late!
the only time it's too late is when someone becomes a zombie.
then they're just not thinking rationally. all they want is flesh and brains.
til then, you can ALWAYS change the amount of troops being sent.
ahhahah thats not what i meant..

i meant you cant send a soldier to fight without a gun a medpack an MRE...

he needs funds..the troops are already being sent...sure it maybe not too late... but its wrong to send a person to war without being fully equipped
 
You need money to keep the troops in Iraq. If democrats cut funding there will be no other option than to bring the troops home.
 
You need money to keep the troops in Iraq. If democrats cut funding there will be no other option than to bring the troops home.
that could be one way to look at it.. we are already there and we have to make sure al this death and fighting does not go in vain now... we owe it to the men and women who served to let them finish ..now that they are there.. and to cut their funding doesnt really show us supporting them..its not their fault..we should cut the presidents pay for every man killed there..then that would bring people home
 
ahhahah thats not what i meant..

i meant you cant send a soldier to fight without a gun a medpack an MRE...

he needs funds..the troops are already being sent...sure it maybe not too late... but its wrong to send a person to war without being fully equipped
they don't need all that MRE medpack gun nonsense.
they just need that ninja:ninja: cat from your avatar.
that thing could fight the enemy.
when they get hungry they could cook it and eat him.
and then they could use his skin as a wound closure.
see, we don't need funding for our troops.
we just need boatloads of ferrel cats.

and clearly if they cut funding they would never hear the end of it.
why is it so hard to keep more troops from being sent? i don't understand that!?
even the republicans have turned on bush so it should be a wipeout when it comes to a vote on the deployment of more.
 
they don't need all that MRE medpack gun nonsense.
they just need that ninja:ninja: cat from your avatar.
that thing could fight the enemy.
when they get hungry they could cook it and eat him.
and then they could use his skin as a wound closure.
see, we don't need funding for our troops.
we just need boatloads of ferrel cats.

and clearly if they cut funding they would never hear the end of it.
why is it so hard to keep more troops from being sent? i don't understand that!?
even the republicans have turned on bush so it should be a wipeout when it comes to a vote on the deployment of more.

u mad cuz im stylin on u?:oldrazz: that cat is hilarious


he can send troops cause congress already gave him the power to do so..ala emperor palpatine:cmad:
 
that could be one way to look at it.. we are already there and we have to make sure al this death and fighting does not go in vain now... we owe it to the men and women who served to let them finish
Let them finish? What if they can't finish and these additional troops die for nothing?
 
Let them finish? What if they can't finish and these additional troops die for nothing?
can we stop the troops from going??? no

we cant cry over that now.. we have to make sure the TROOPS that are on their way and that are there already..have what they need
 
we owe it to the men and women who served to let them finish
"down down down.
red knight goin down."
knight.jpg
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,845
Messages
22,034,137
Members
45,829
Latest member
AheadOfTheCurve
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"