That's because it went from a Sky1 (UK) production to a Cinemax (US) co-production, lol. Gratuitous violence/sex/nudity was kinda part of the Cinemax brand, so yeah, the change was glaring. But I grew to enjoy the Scott/Stonebridge combo more than the original characters anyway.Had never seen any of this until this morning....I finished season ONE today....cool interesting show. I'm watching first episode of season TWO right now. Second season really changes things....not just a change of characters, but heavy on the sex and nudity. Not complaining...just thrown by the change of content.
Yeah I know. I realize now my post wasn't clear, but I was agreeing with him that S1 had a good cast while explaining why I still preferred the Scott/Stonebridge seasons.I think C. Lee meant the Armitage season and not the first Winchester and Stapleton season where the show came over to the US broadcasting and became a bigger hit as a result.
Yeah, it was truly a bummer to see [blackout]him go out like that.[/blackout] I was afraid they'd do the same with with Scott/Stonebridge in the new ones, but I've heard that's not the case.Yeah, I figured that was what you meant on second thought flickchick85, my apologies.
My only issue in season 2 was:
I kind of got upset they wasted Armitage right off the bat. I mean write him off the show, but did you really just have to kill the guy in the first 5 minutes?