The 50 Biggest Movies of 2009 (according to timesonline.com, anyway)

[LegendaryCaleb]

i agree with where the watchmen are at ...the list is kinda crappy

 

[Cinemaman]

BS

I'd put it like this:

1. Watchmen
2. Avatar
3. Terminator Salvation
4. Star Trek
5. Public Enemies

 

[Papa Burgundy]

Aeg!

I read this earlier today...!

Don't know why there's such a big deal over the Potter flicks!

because theyere freakin awesome.

and this next one is the one of the most grown up and dark in the series. and it looks like its been made that way.

fingers crossed that they dont cut out too much...

havent read the list though about to right now...

 

[Papa Burgundy]

fanboys over gi joe and the spirit in the top 30???

a pointless sequel to donnie darko on the list?

FAIL

 

[The Amazing Lee]

I could be wrong, but wasn't Edgar Wright going to do Antman as well?

He's directing an adaptation of the comic book Scott Pilgrim before that as well.

 

[Sawyer]

fanboys over gi joe and the spirit in the top 30???

a pointless sequel to donnie darko on the list?

FAIL

GI Joe is going to be terrible. TERRIBLE!

But still better than Dragonball and probably Street Fighter...

 

[[A]]

GI Joe is going to be terrible. TERRIBLE!

But still better than Dragonball and probably Street Fighter...

That's a trilogy of horror!

 

[[A]]

..so, after reading many Sundance reviews, I'll update the list with the movies I'm willing to see this year:

• 
  [*]Bronson
  [*]Big Fan
  [*]I Love You Phillip Morris
  [*]Moon
  [*]Push (the one based on a novel by some character named Sapphire)
• Grace
  [*]World's Greatest Dad
  

 

[BloodyWolverine]

Hum no Dragonball Evolution but put in Tanking Spirit and Ink Heart.

 

[Laderlappen]

This list is way better. But it only has 29:
http://www.pastemagazine.com/blogs/lists/2009/01/29-most-anticipated-movies-of-2009.html

 

[[A]]

^ they included Wolfman or whatever it's called

 

[Watson]

^What's wrong with Wolfman?

 

[Sam Fisher]

Pink Panther 2, Night at the Museum 2, GI Joe? It's obvious a bunch of tweens wrote this ****!

What's wrong with this? The first one was funny.

 

[[A]]

^What's wrong with Wolfman?

well, it started as a good thing--then you start reading that it was a somewhat trouble production, and because of this Benicio Del Toro stopped caring halfway shooting, plus the release date change..

 

[Watson]

^It could still be good. Del Toro on his worst day is better than half the actors out there. Plus it isn't the only movie on the list to have the same troubles (re: Where the Wild Things Are).

 

[Laderlappen]

^ they included Wolfman or whatever it's called

Of course the list isnt flawless...

 

[[A]]

^It could still be good. Del Toro on his worst day is better than half the actors out there. Plus it isn't the only movie on the list to have the same troubles (re: Where the Wild Things Are).

Of course. Plus, Hugo Weaving is in it and that's a good sign (if you ignore V for Vendetta)

 

[Watson]

Of course. Plus, Hugo Weaving is in it and that's a good sign (if you ignore V for Vendetta)

Cool I didn't know that. Plus Weaving was never actually supposed to be in V, so we can't blame him for that

 

[Octoberist]

am I only one who thinks that if GI JOe is just stupid fun, then it won't be terrible? It's my same logic as Transformers. Mind you, I would like to see Stephen Sommers of the first Mummy, not the Stephen Sommers of Van Helsing.