The absolute worst DC film, in your opinion?

Absolute worst DC movie?

  • Superman and the Mole-Men

  • Superman III

  • Supergirl

  • Superman IV: The Quest for Peace

  • Batman Forever

  • Batman & Robin

  • Steel

  • Catwoman

  • Constantine

  • The Losers

  • Jonah Hex

  • Green Lantern

  • Man of Steel

  • Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice

  • Other


Results are only viewable after voting.
Okay Catwoman is horrible sure no one will ever say anything else about it but it was a movie about a comic book character who has had some but not a lot of exposure so it could always get ****ed up.

But a movie with the three biggest Icons of Superheroes should not be that bad. At least catwoman has some enjoyably dumb ****ing scenes but BvS is horrendous all around and if a good scene comes it will be ****ed up completely by the next one. And Again SUPERMAN, BATMAN and WONDER WOMAN is in the same movie. HOW THE **** IS THAT SCREWED UP?
 
I have no idea how any of these movies are worst than Steel. I think a lot of you must have blocked the experience from your mind because it was so traumatic.
 
I've not seen some of these so can't vote, but I'd go for Superman IV etc.
 
DCU wise: I hated Man Of Steel, but The Green Lantern was the drizzling sh**s.

Believe it or not, Catwoman is in the same continuity as the '89-'97 Batman films. I originally thought that photo of Selina Kyle from BR (seen among mentor-woman's research material) was just an easter egg from the prop department, but no. I actually got ahold of the film's shooting script, and the picture is specified to be there. The whole mythology about the cat spirits was legitimately supposed to be a retroactive explanation of how Selina survived her fall and why she changed so much afterwards.

It was the only good part of the movie.

13343158_10206941290238647_4687081074614942977_n.jpg
 
Out of the moves I've seen on the list, it's Catwoman. But it can be easily forgotten or ignored.
 
Batman and Robin since I have not seen Catwoman
 
Constantine wasn't the best adaptation of Hellblazer out there, but it was overall a decent flick, one that doesn't really deserve to be up on this poll. that being said, Catwoman , like everyone else seems to agree on lmao
 
Constantine wasn't the best adaptation of Hellblazer out there, but it was overall a decent flick, one that doesn't really deserve to be up on this poll. that being said, Catwoman , like everyone else seems to agree on lmao

Yeah, as a Hellblazer adaptation, it's bad. But as a supernatural action thriller? I think it's pretty cool.

Speaking of Hellblazer, it's a shame the Constantine show didn't work out. It had a lot of problems, but Matt Ryan were the perfect John Constantine, IMO.
 
BvS the 2nd worst DC movie ever? Lmao ok

Well, that's what happens when you have a one trick pony director, bad writers, and the main actors recast. This movie should've came out 6 years ago.
 
I have no idea how any of these movies are worst than Steel. I think a lot of you must have blocked the experience from your mind because it was so traumatic.

The only praise that I can give Steel is that the powers and personality of John Henry Irons are partially intact. That isn't nearly enough to save it, but at least there was a rudimentary understanding of the central character. Catwoman doesn't even have that.
 
Catwoman and the dreaded Superman 3 with Richard Pryor in it. ugh! :hmr:

I thought about Green Lantern in there, but even GL doesn't compare to the previous mentioned movies.
 
Believe it or not, Catwoman is in the same continuity as the '89-'97 Batman films. I originally thought that photo of Selina Kyle from BR (seen among mentor-woman's research material) was just an easter egg from the prop department, but no. I actually got ahold of the Catwoman's shooting script, and the picture is specified to be there. The whole mythology about the cat spirits was legitimately supposed to be a retroactive explanation of how Selina survived her fall and why she changed so much afterwards.

Huh... I was not aware of this. Interesting.
 
Catwoman and the dreaded Superman 3 with Richard Pryor in it. ugh! :hmr:

I thought about Green Lantern in there, but even GL doesn't compare to the previous mentioned movies.

Green Lantern isn't THAT bad. It falls somewhere in between for me.
 
Green Lantern isn't THAT bad. It falls somewhere in between for me.

I think what makes Green Lantern so bad is that it came out in 2011. By this time, we already had the likes of The Dark Knight, Iron Man, Spider-Man 2, and other films that had brought us out of that slump in the mid 2000s where we had mediocre superhero films like Elektra, the theatrical cut of Daredevil, Constantine, Hulk, Catwoman and so on. And despite moving in a positive direction, Green Lantern feels like a big step backwards.
 
I think what makes Green Lantern so bad is that it came out in 2011. By this time, we already had the likes of The Dark Knight, Iron Man, Spider-Man 2, and other films that had brought us out of that slump in the mid 2000s where we had mediocre superhero films like Elektra, the theatrical cut of Daredevil, Constantine, Hulk, Catwoman and so on. And despite moving in a positive direction, Green Lantern feels like a big step backwards.

That is a very fair comment. I still think GL suffered from poor casting (except Mark Strong as Sinestro - he was perfect) a lame story and half-assed attempts at villains.

Reynolds was never the Hal Jordan that we could give a **** about. I'm glad he's embraced Deadpool, so we can put that whole casting behind us.

I would say that GL is very mediocre at best - which in some ways makes it harder to watch than say Batman and Robin - which is just terrible.

To be honest though, I would much rather watch GL than see Batman v Superman again. Ugh !
 
Worst thing about GL is its just... boring. Boring and unimaginative. It is the very definition of cookie cutter which is a huge disappointment because the GL mythos is so rich and has unlimited potential
 
Worst thing about GL is its just... boring. Boring and unimaginative. It is the very definition of cookie cutter which is a huge disappointment because the GL mythos is so rich and has unlimited potential

I completely agree, it was disappointing, the GL universe has a huge cast of great characters.
Really, the whole movie should have been in outer space (kind of like the animated series, which was awesome).

Still, it was less disappointing than Batman v Superman !
 
I have no idea how any of these movies are worst than Steel. I think a lot of you must have blocked the experience from your mind because it was so traumatic.

I only ever saw Steel once but I actually thought it had a weird sincerity to it that somewhat (heavy emphasis on somewhat) made up for how terrible it is. And make no mistake, it's a terrible movie - I just think DC has made several that are worse.
 
That is a very fair comment. I still think GL suffered from poor casting (except Mark Strong as Sinestro - he was perfect) a lame story and half-assed attempts at villains.

Reynolds was never the Hal Jordan that we could give a **** about. I'm glad he's embraced Deadpool, so we can put that whole casting behind us.

I would say that GL is very mediocre at best - which in some ways makes it harder to watch than say Batman and Robin - which is just terrible.

To be honest though, I would much rather watch GL than see Batman v Superman again. Ugh !

I wonder if there's an "ultimate cut" of GL, lol.
 
GL is the worst due to all of its sins. For the amount of money that was spent on that thing for it to be so ridiculously meandering and boring is its biggest crime.
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"