The Astonishing Spider-Man

PhotoJones

Avenger
Joined
Mar 4, 2005
Messages
24,050
Reaction score
0
Points
31
Cebulski pitched in for Quesada at the Fan Expo in Canada and revealed that the Loeb/Campbell project is in fact a mini and that they're refering to it as "The Astonishing Spider-Man".

I'm actually looking foward to this. Campbell's Amazing Spider-Man covers were always bright and colorful, and I'm missing that in a Spidey title.
 
Cebulski pitched in for Quesada at the Fan Expo in Canada and revealed that the Loeb/Campbell project is in fact a mini and that they're refering to it as "The Astonishing Spider-Man".

I'm actually looking foward to this. Campbell's Amazing Spider-Man covers were always bright and colorful, and I'm missing that in a Spidey title.

What is it about, and how is it different from any other Spidey story other than cool covers?
 
It's sad, because they've been working on this for like 2 years already.
 
Fo' shizzle. I want to know where Campbell's income is coming from, cause it ain't comics.
 
Meh. They couldn't have come up with anything better than "Astonishing Spider-Man"?
 
Meh. They couldn't have come up with anything better than "Astonishing Spider-Man"?

I don't think it's an official name. I think it's something they're using until there is an official name.
 
Good point. Can't say the project gets me excited though.
 
Campbell's an either/or artist. Either you like him or you don't. :whatever:
 
Plagiarist. :down

<<< Stole his avatar from some *****e on Newsarama. ^_^
 
*****es on Newsarama deserve to be stolen from. :up:

I'm not too interested in this. Loeb's a hit-or-miss writer for me and Campbell's an always-miss artist for me, so this book looks like it'll suck for me.
My avatar? My avatar was given to me by Corp. If he stole it, that's another story.
The only stealing I did was from the FotC TV show when I downloaded the episode and cut that clip out. :o
 
*****es on Newsarama deserve to be stolen from. :up:

I'm not too interested in this. Loeb's a hit-or-miss writer for me and Campbell's an always-miss artist for me, so this book looks like it'll suck for me.

The only stealing I did was from the FotC TV show when I downloaded the episode and cut that clip out. :o

Pretty much my thoughts to a T. Loeb has been especially hit or miss since signing an exclusive to Marvel. Cambell's alright as an artist, although he's been away from regular gigs so long that like Joe Mad, aside for random covers and slowness (or random art for WIZARD), his buzz has lowered.

Doesn't anyone find it counter-productive that Spidey's two B-List titles are being merged with his A-List ASM in order to trim down the line, yet they are launching yet another Spidey title? Doesn't that defeat the purposes of the merge (because Spidey's other two titles sold about half what ASM does or less, but still on par with, oh, ULTIMATE FANTASTIC FOUR or better)? Or is it much like when Marvel used to cancel a low selling X-title under the premise of, "trimming down the line" during the late 90's-early 00's, merely to then launch another 1-2 X-Books to replace it? Until Marvel sticks to their guns about trimming titles, no one will take them seriously. Even if it is a mini, that still means an extra Spider-Book on the racks. Like in the 90's when Venom never technically had an ongoing, but merely a train of mini's for about 5 years to the point they may as well have made it an ongoing.

Some mini's have a clear purpose and others just tell a story that could have easily been told in the ongoing. Books clog the racks some weeks.
 
Pretty much my thoughts to a T. Loeb has been especially hit or miss since signing an exclusive to Marvel. Cambell's alright as an artist, although he's been away from regular gigs so long that like Joe Mad, aside for random covers and slowness (or random art for WIZARD), his buzz has lowered.

Doesn't anyone find it counter-productive that Spidey's two B-List titles are being merged with his A-List ASM in order to trim down the line, yet they are launching yet another Spidey title? Doesn't that defeat the purposes of the merge (because Spidey's other two titles sold about half what ASM does or less, but still on par with, oh, ULTIMATE FANTASTIC FOUR or better)? Or is it much like when Marvel used to cancel a low selling X-title under the premise of, "trimming down the line" during the late 90's-early 00's, merely to then launch another 1-2 X-Books to replace it? Until Marvel sticks to their guns about trimming titles, no one will take them seriously. Even if it is a mini, that still means an extra Spider-Book on the racks. Like in the 90's when Venom never technically had an ongoing, but merely a train of mini's for about 5 years to the point they may as well have made it an ongoing.

Some mini's have a clear purpose and others just tell a story that could have easily been told in the ongoing. Books clog the racks some weeks.

How do we know this is one of the books the "clog the racks"? I'm not saying it's not, but isn't it a bit early to be judging the book's when we literally have no clue what it's about yet?
 
So it's called Astonishing, because it will be Astonishing when they actually get the book out?
 
How do we know this is one of the books the "clog the racks"? I'm not saying it's not, but isn't it a bit early to be judging the book's when we literally have no clue what it's about yet?
You should know by now that Dread over thinks everything.

If you ask him his favorite food, you'd get a five paragraph dissertation and review.
 
How do we know this is one of the books the "clog the racks"? I'm not saying it's not, but isn't it a bit early to be judging the book's when we literally have no clue what it's about yet?

I'm a message board comic fan. It is NEVER too early to jump to conclusions. Otherwise all preview topics would consist of 4 guys going, "I'll wait and see" and no worthwhile discussion would happen. ;)

You should know by now that Dread over thinks everything.

If you ask him his favorite food, you'd get a five paragraph dissertation and review.

I don't even know what I would list as a favorite food. :o
 
I'm a message board comic fan. It is NEVER too early to jump to conclusions. Otherwise all preview topics would consist of 4 guys going, "I'll wait and see" and no worthwhile discussion would happen. ;)

That's all well and good, but there's a difference between speculating and straight up dismissing something, not based on the creators or the characters, but on the story of which we know nothing about. C'mon, dude...find something else to think on.
 
That's all well and good, but there's a difference between speculating and straight up dismissing something, not based on the creators or the characters, but on the story of which we know nothing about. C'mon, dude...find something else to think on.

So, in your eyes, every series that becomes a mini despite said character sometimes having up to 3 ongoings is totally justified as a mini.

I'd rather some of those stories, if appropriate, got told in the ongoings. But that's been a personal quibble for a while.

I'll give a good example; SPIDER-MAN BREAKOUT. It was a decent mini and I enjoyed it, but there was utterly no reason it couldn't have been a run in one of his ongoings other than ASM which was doing some damned thing. JMS was even having Spidey hang out with his New Avengers teammates in ASM so it would have fit for one of his side titles (and Spidey almost always has 2). The only reason it wasn't was because in a way the U-Foes and the criminals had more focus than Spider-Man, but the title was his so it would sell and because he was in it.

I mean if it is some out of continuity thing, then it is okay. But sometimes that ratio is 50/50.

I grow wary of franchises being overextended. The slicing of 3 Spidey ongoings into one merged one was an idea that showed a sense of wanting to reduce the overextension, I just don't want to see a repeat of min's being thrown out just to have X amount of ____ books in a given month.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"