What inspired you to read it? I think I originally read it because there was a scholarship contest where you had to write an essay about Atlas Shrugged...
It's a pretty longand complex novel, and I love good long novels (keeps me entertained longer). I think it was selfish and irresponsible for all of the geniuses in the world to go into hiding. Abandoning the world so that it will collapse and you can create a new one to your own liking? Many people probably starved because of what they did.
I read it for the scholarship contest as well. Small world, huh?
As to your point about the geniuses going into hiding, Rand contends that selfishness is a virtue. In her philosophy, no one is responsible for anyone else unless they agree to be responsible for someone else. It was selfish for the titans to withdraw from the world and take what was theirs with them, but it wasn't irresponsible because they hadn't agreed to be responsible for anyone but themselves. It was actually an act of heroism, given that it was done in response to tyrants who were, essentially, trying to enslave Galt and the others. That's the way I saw it at least.
Did you win the scholarship? (I never finished the essay).
I never even started the essay because it took me way too long to read the book. Plus, it seemed to me, after reading the book, that accepting a scholarship for college instead of paying for college out of your own pocket was so anti-Rand that I wanted no part of it anyway.
I haven't read the Book yet, but I know a little bit about Objectivism, but isn't Private Donations for Scholarships completely different that the Government Seizing money from the Private Sector through Police Force and then giving Scholarships to students more in line with Objectivism and therefore more Randian?I never even started the essay because it took me way too long to read the book. Plus, it seemed to me, after reading the book, that accepting a scholarship for college instead of paying for college out of your own pocket was so anti-Rand that I wanted no part of it anyway.
I haven't read the Book yet, but I know a little bit about Objectivism, but isn't Private Donations for Scholarships completely different that the Government Seizing money from the Private Sector through Police Force and then giving Scholarships to students more in line with Objectivism and therefore more Randian?
It does because I have no humor.
You can't be heroic and selfish at the same time. A hero puts other's needs above his/her own. Also, as an owner of a corpration, I suppose one has to take responsibility for the employees. Maybe three quarters of the company's employees are lazy empty-minded people, but it still leaves a quarter of the good employees out of work, especially those who sacrificed for the company. Those who had families to support and worked har at their job would be at a total loss when their boss leaves because of idealogical problems.
One thing Ayn gets wrong is that selfishness is not the prime enzyme for a productive company but competiveness and good morals. The CEOs who take huge bonuses while companies sink can be called selfish. If they were also competitive with other companies, desired to create the best, cheapest product without cheating, then we might not have this current problem with the economy. But that's probably a small part of the problem and it's probably too complicated for me to understand.
Did you win the scholarship? (I never finished the essay).
I've not read Atlas Shrugged although I HAVE been searching my local libraries for it. I did enjoy ANTHEM very much though and if ATLAS SHRUGGED or FOUNTAINHEAD is as good, I'll just buy them if my searched at local libraries continue to fail me.I read it for the scholarship contest as well. Small world, huh?
As to your point about the geniuses going into hiding, Rand contends that selfishness is a virtue. In her philosophy, no one is responsible for anyone else unless they agree to be responsible for someone else. It was selfish for the titans to withdraw from the world and take what was theirs with them, but it wasn't irresponsible because they hadn't agreed to be responsible for anyone but themselves. It was actually an act of heroism, given that it was done in response to tyrants who were, essentially, trying to enslave Galt and the others. That's the way I saw it at least.
I just picked it up. Has anyone Read it before, want to discuss it?