• Super Maintenance

    Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.

    Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.

    We apologize for the inconvenience.

'The Brown Bunny', or 'Watch Vincent Gallo Do Stuff For 90 Minutes'.

SolidSnakeMGS

Superhero
Joined
Feb 7, 2006
Messages
5,589
Reaction score
0
Points
31
See Vincent Gallo drive around for 20 minutes. Watch Vincent Gallo get gas, eat at a chinese restaurant, take a piss, take an unsurprisingly short shower, dress himself, and drink a coke. And that excitement is only in the first 30 minutes! Yes, times flies by while watching this fascinating piece as fast as the bugs accumulate on the windshield of Gallo's Ped-o-van, which I feel we truly did not see enough scenes of. I am eagerly awaiting the extended cut which I heard has a full uninterrupted 20 minute scene of bugs hitting the windshield. I cannot wait!

We see a lot of Vincent Gallo's face. Even though Gallo wrote, directed and shot the film, I don't think this was a vanity decision. We need to see his emotionless, greasy, creepy looking face so that we can get a sense of what he is going through as he drives around and stops and goes to a motel and stuff like that. Now Gallo better never rob a bank of steal a bike in front of me, as a police sketch artist would have his work cut out for him with me. I close my eyes and Gallo's face is burned into my vision like an old computer monitor that's had a static image on it too long.

I think what happened is that the cameraman was very new. Sometimes he had the camera ON when it should have been off, say for example when Gallo is driving around endlessly and stops at a redlight. Now when there was other stuff happening, like plot and story, the camera was OFF. I think there was explosions and at least one stick fight (a'la the beginning of Rambo III) in the movie, but they weren't recorded as the aforementioned cameraman was being dumb.

This movie could have easily been an instructional video on how to drive. The only thing that gets more screen time than Gallo's face is driving scenes. There are at least 10 scenes where we see the windshield and the many roads Gallo drives down. He drives at night, in the rain, in traffic...and even AT NIGHT WHILE IT IS RAINING!! He stops at red lights and stop signs, and even uses his turn signal and I don't think he ever went over the speed limit! He is a very considerate driver!

Hopefully, we get a sequel where we see more driving around, maybe in the snow or something. I also want to see more everyday life stuff, as I was disappointed we didn't see Gallo inflating the tires on his van or tying his shoes or picking out a belt to wear. There is just so much that can be done with this!
 
I liked Buffilo 66, Vincent's other film that he directed.

But I have to agree with Solid...beside that...certain 'scene' with Chloe (WINK WINK) everything else is dull.

I love long movies. I love character pieces. But I don't what Vincent was thinking here..besides that "one scene". Haha.
 
See Vincent Gallo drive around for 20 minutes. Watch Vincent Gallo get gas, eat at a chinese restaurant, take a piss, take an unsurprisingly short shower, dress himself, and drink a coke. And that excitement is only in the first 30 minutes! Yes, times flies by while watching this fascinating piece as fast as the bugs accumulate on the windshield of Gallo's Ped-o-van, which I feel we truly did not see enough scenes of. I am eagerly awaiting the extended cut which I heard has a full uninterrupted 20 minute scene of bugs hitting the windshield. I cannot wait!

We see a lot of Vincent Gallo's face. Even though Gallo wrote, directed and shot the film, I don't think this was a vanity decision. We need to see his emotionless, greasy, creepy looking face so that we can get a sense of what he is going through as he drives around and stops and goes to a motel and stuff like that. Now Gallo better never rob a bank of steal a bike in front of me, as a police sketch artist would have his work cut out for him with me. I close my eyes and Gallo's face is burned into my vision like an old computer monitor that's had a static image on it too long.

I think what happened is that the cameraman was very new. Sometimes he had the camera ON when it should have been off, say for example when Gallo is driving around endlessly and stops at a redlight. Now when there was other stuff happening, like plot and story, the camera was OFF. I think there was explosions and at least one stick fight (a'la the beginning of Rambo III) in the movie, but they weren't recorded as the aforementioned cameraman was being dumb.

This movie could have easily been an instructional video on how to drive. The only thing that gets more screen time than Gallo's face is driving scenes. There are at least 10 scenes where we see the windshield and the many roads Gallo drives down. He drives at night, in the rain, in traffic...and even AT NIGHT WHILE IT IS RAINING!! He stops at red lights and stop signs, and even uses his turn signal and I don't think he ever went over the speed limit! He is a very considerate driver!

Hopefully, we get a sequel where we see more driving around, maybe in the snow or something. I also want to see more everyday life stuff, as I was disappointed we didn't see Gallo inflating the tires on his van or tying his shoes or picking out a belt to wear. There is just so much that can be done with this!
What about the 'intermate' scenes?
 
The dude filmed himself getting oral from Chloe Sevigny and gets to call it art. Aren't movies awesome?
 
I remember Roger Elbert panned this film, and the director wished death upon him for it.
 
I remember Roger Elbert panned this film, and the director wished death upon him for it.

Yeah, they went back and forth at each others' throats, but suddenly they kissed and made up, Gallo shortened the film to 90 minutes, and then Ebert gave the movie 3 stars. My respect for Ebert has been dwindling long before that, but that sham quickened my dislike for him. Gallo I've never liked.
 
Yeah, they went back and forth at each others' throats, but suddenly they kissed and made up, Gallo shortened the film to 90 minutes, and then Ebert gave the movie 3 stars. My respect for Ebert has been dwindling long before that, but that sham quickened my dislike for him. Gallo I've never liked.

Agreed. I've always found Gallo to be one of these pseudo-intelligent people that claims to have it all figured out, only to be a complete tool. His self important bs is just boring and that's exactly what the film is as well. The film was just basically boring. The "scene" in the film is also boring. If it was truly there for the sake of his "art" I would let it go, but you can tell that its deliberately there to get a reaction and nothing more. That's just lazy film making in my opinion. Ebert went along with the bs too. Gallo is in this for nothing more than seeing the reaction he gets. It's a hollow and played out technique in Hollywood and the art scene. If you're going to be confrontational with just about everyone...at least bring something new to the table. Don't just copy everything that has come before.
 
The "scene" in the film is also boring. If it was truly there for the sake of his "art" I would let it go, but you can tell that its deliberately there to get a reaction and nothing more.

foreal...add some camera movement, different angles, ANYTHING! what he did instead was basically a voyeur, amateur porn scene.
 
i rented brown bunny. but it wasnt a good film.
it was kinda like watching a guy drive around in a car picking up chicks
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"