- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 70,026
- Reaction score
- 39,621
- Points
- 118
Legit shocked one of Superman's most iconic villains is a Silver Age creation.
Which Super Friends couldn't be done today? I know the obvious answer is Apache Chief.![]()
You honestly don't see the difference? Like forget that Gunn has completely changed his persona for a sec. That he's super cultivated. Nolan does the marketing obligation but stays in the shadows 99% of the time. Reeves and Coogler do more social media, but I don't remember either of them spending a lot of time selling us on the vision of a blood thirsty studio head. I also don't feel like any of those three try to overshadow their stars.The people who insinuate that the writer/director being at the forefront of a film's selling point is a problem are coming at the film in bad faith to begin with. It's marketing. A co-CEO is writing and directing a major IP blockbuster. It's gonna be addressed and flaunted. It's nothing.
What do these people think articles and interviews with the writer/director are though? Is it a problem that he was on set directing the film he wrote?
What do these people think when Reeves does his thing? Nolan? Coogler right now? Every director ever?
Gunn sure does a lot of social media for someone who supposedly stays in the shadows.You honestly don't see the difference? Like forget that Gunn has completely changed his persona for a sec. That he's super cultivated. Nolan does the marketing obligation but stays in the shadows 99% of the time. Reeves and Coogler do more social media, but I don't remember either of them spending a lot of time selling us on the vision of a blood thirsty studio head. I also don't feel like any of those three try to overshadow their stars.
Honestly this feels more Snyder then any of the three you mentioned.
You honestly don't see the difference? Like forget that Gunn has completely changed his persona for a sec. That he's super cultivated. Nolan does the marketing obligation but stays in the shadows 99% of the time. Reeves and Coogler do more social media, but I don't remember either of them spending a lot of time selling us on the vision of a blood thirsty studio head. I also don't feel like any of those three try to overshadow their stars.
Honestly this feels more Snyder then any of the three you mentioned.
Logically Said!Of course I see the difference between their day to day interaction with social media. I'm talking about the marketing aspect. He has a massive film coming out right now. Him being in BTS photos in articles makes sense to me. Him being on social media even more then he already is makes sense to me. It doesn't have to be liked. But it is what it is w Gunn.