I'm going to have to agree. Venom shouldn't even have played a part in the movie. The best he deserved was to be saved for the end as a cliffhanger for a possible fourth film. But his popularity is more the product of fan-boy hype than to actual strong characterization, which ironically seemed to be the case in SM3.He really doesn't.
I say all 3 of them were uninteresting.Venom is more interesting than Sandman or Green Goblin Jr.
Never would happen in Raimi's family friendly version of Spider-Man. Plus, to properly do Venom's story, it deserves its own film rather than a cameo at the end.^ This.
He should have been a cross between Freddy Krueger and a Xenomorph like he was portrayed in his debut in the comics.
Ultimate Green Goblin
Awesome image
Lol
So he's the one to draw SM2 intro pictures? Good to confirm that
Venom is more interesting than Sandman or Green Goblin Jr.
Yup, Alex Ross. I kinda wish they would've brought him back for SM3.So he's the one to draw SM2 intro pictures? Good to confirm that
This is another thing I wish they would've stretched into a 4th film. Not only did it all feel rushed with Harry in SM3, but then he gets amnesia right away too which is never a good thing story-wise.Harry Osborn? Uninteresting? The tortured soul who's trying to please a father who never loved him by lashing out at his best and only friend, alienating everyone around him, especially his wife and son, as he descends into madness and ultimately sacrifices himself doing the right thing?
We're talking about the same Green Goblin II, right?
Is she actually holding them back or this just a well timed shot of a woman about to be trampled?
Oh dear god.
So either A: They're retconning Sinestro being a villain, or B: The Guardians let him back into the Corps after all the crimes, murders, and crap he's done.
Is the picture cool? Yes. The story behind it? Highly doubtful.
Seriously. Come up with ONE logical explanation as to why the hell Sinestro would be a Green Lantern again.