The Rush Limbaugh Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hey, I was wrong. I'm man enough to admit it, dude. My information was obviously outdated. :up:

If you want to really talk about a disregard for the facts, however, I'll direct you to your very first post...the original post of this thread.

"According to all four major global temperature tracking outlets (Hadley, NASA's GISS, UAH, RSS) that have released updated data the last year saw an entire degree drop in global temp that effectively erases 100 Years of warming."

Your apparent, "disregard for the facts," something that was based simply on faulty information, by the way, is at least equal to my own, buddy.

Swing away. :up:

I will say this about that quote. Noting a year to year change in Global temperature is like noting weight changes over the course of a few hours to keep track of loss while on a diet. You need to look over long term trends, not yearly data taken by itself as an extrapolation for future trends.
 
I don't see how my opening post shows a disregard for fact seeing as I actually researched and pulled that line from the article itself. It wasn't some contrived notion I pulled out of the air for my own benefit, it's what it said in black and white.
That was my point.
 
Oops, wrong again.

Study : Hurricane Spike Not Caused By Global Warming

Monday, May 19, 2008
service_ap_36.gif


WASHINGTON — Global warming isn't to blame for the recent jump in the number of hurricanes in the Atlantic, concludes a study by a prominent federal scientist whose position has shifted on the subject.

Not only that, warmer temperatures will actually reduce the number of hurricanes in the Atlantic and those making landfall, research meteorologist Tom Knutson reported in a study released Sunday.
In the past, Knutson has raised concerns about the effects of climate change on storms. His new paper has the potential to heat up a simmering debate among meteorologists about current and future effects of global warming in the Atlantic.

Ever since Hurricane Katrina in 2005, hurricanes have often been seen as a symbol of global warming's wrath. Many climate change experts have tied the rise of hurricanes in recent years to global warming and hotter waters that fuel them.

Another group of experts, those who study hurricanes and who are more often skeptical about global warming, say there is no link. They attribute the recent increase to a natural multi-decade cycle.
Related


What makes this study different is Knutson, a meteorologist with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's fluid dynamics lab in Princeton, N.J.

He has warned about the harmful effects of climate change and has even complained in the past about being censored by the Bush administration on past studies on the dangers of global warming.
He said his new study, based on a computer model, argues "against the notion that we've already seen a really dramatic increase in Atlantic hurricane activity resulting from greenhouse warming."
The study, published online Sunday in the journal Nature Geoscience, predicts that by the end of the century the number of hurricanes in the Atlantic will fall by 18 percent.

The number of hurricanes making landfall in the United States and its neighbors — anywhere west of Puerto Rico — will drop by 30 percent because of wind factors.

The biggest storms — those with winds of more than 110 mph — would only decrease in frequency by 8 percent. Tropical storms, those with winds between 39 and 73 mph, would decrease by 27 percent.
It's not all good news from Knutson's study, however. His computer model also forecasts that hurricanes and tropical storms will be wetter and fiercer.

Rainfall within 30 miles of a hurricane should jump by 37 percent and wind strength should increase by about 2 percent, Knutson's study says.
And Knutson said this study significantly underestimates the increase in wind strength. Some other scientists criticized his computer model.
MIT hurricane meteorologist Kerry Emanuel, while praising Knutson as a scientist, called his conclusion "demonstrably wrong" based on a computer model that doesn't look properly at storms.
Kevin Trenberth, a climate scientist, said Knutson's computer model is poor at assessing tropical weather and "fail to replicate storms with any kind of fidelity."

Trenberth, climate analysis chief at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo., said it is not just the number of hurricanes "that matter, it is also the intensity, duration and size, and this study falls short on these issues."
Knutson acknowledges weaknesses in his computer model and said it primarily gives a coarse overview, not an accurate picture on individual storms and storm strength. He said the latest model doesn't produce storms surpassing 112 mph.

But NOAA hurricane meteorologist Chris Landsea, who wasn't part of this study, praised Knutson's work as "very consistent with what's being said all along."

"I think global warming is a big concern, but when it comes to hurricanes the evidence for changes is pretty darn tiny," Landsea said.
Hurricane season starts June 1 in the Atlantic and a Colorado State University forecast predicts about a 50 percent more active than normal storm season this year.
NOAA puts out its own seasonal forecast on May 22.

In a normal year about 10 named storms form. Six become hurricanes and two become major hurricanes. On average, about five hurricanes hit the United States every three years.
 
Oops, wrong again.

I don't know who was idiotic enough to argue that global warming was causing the surge in hurricane activity. I took a class on global warming and the environment, and the professor ruled that theory out in one of the first classes.
 
you will notice how the fact that the Hurricane spike isn't caused by global warming doesn't mean that Global warming itself doesn't exist or is a hoax.
it's like

"I have cancer and my house is on fire, the fire must've caused my cancer!"
"dude, the fire didn't cause your cancer"
"oh....I guess my house isn't on fire then"

:confused:
 
you will notice how the fact that the Hurricane spike isn't caused by global warming doesn't mean that Global warming itself doesn't exist or is a hoax.
it's like

"I have cancer and my house is on fire, the fire must've caused my cancer!"
"dude, the fire didn't cause your cancer"
"oh....I guess my house isn't on fire then"

:confused:
Or it could be said, "Global Warming causes Hurricanes"

"Oh wait, Global Warming doesn't cause hurricanes"

"Are you sure, because, I you know, need more money for funding"

"Yeah, Hurricanes and Global Warming doesn't have anything to do with eachother"

"Are you Sure, cause, I need some funding"

"Yeah"

"Huh, well, then Global Warming causes something else, AND I need funding."

"Hazah! Yes, that's the ticket, Global Warming causes 'Confusion', I need Funding too!!!"

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1999774/posts
 
From Drudge:

LIMBAUGH SIGNS THROUGH 2016; $400 MILLION DEAL SHATTERS BROADCAST RECORDS

Wed Jul 02 2008 09:02:18 ET
**Exclusive**

The American broadcast industry is rocked, realigned and blasted into a new orbit, yet again, by Rush Limbaugh, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

In what is being described as an unprecedented radio contract, Limbaugh will keep his syndicated show on-the-air and e-v-e-r-y-w-h-e-r-e through 2016 with CLEAR CHANNEL and PREMIERE RADIO.

Already host of the most lucrative hours since radio's inception, Limbaugh's total package is valued north of $400 million, according to media insiders.

The NEW YORK TIMES will claim this weekend that Limbaugh, marking 20 years this summer as a national host, has secured a 9-figure signing bonus for the new deal, newsroom sources tell DRUDGE.

MORE

In its controversial profile, the TIMES reports that Limbaugh is buying a new G550 jet and is making an estimated $38 million a year.

rln.jpg


[The cover photo of the TIMES Sunday magazine depicts Limbaugh 'dark and sinister' in a theme of THE GODFATHER.]

While newspapers and traditional broadcast media are experiencing declining revenues, Limbaugh's golden microphone has turned diamond-laced:

Earnings now pace him ahead of the annual salaries for network news anchors: Katie Couric, Brian Williams, Charlie Gibson and Diane Sawyer — combined!

MORE

The deal represents a stunning triumph over the establishment by an outsider who connected with and captured the spirit of the nation's heartland.

Developing...


If I were to cast a Kingdom Come movie, Limbaugh would be my first choice for Lex.

While I don't agree with Limbaugh on everything, especially his simple demonizing of the left - his show is incredibly entertaining and he is one of the most important figures in the history of modern (for lack of a better word) journalism. He made Talk Radio a viable platform and has helped, I believe, balance out the media to an extent.
 
Again, this speaks to me of the utter failure of our public school system.
 
While I don't agree with everything Limbaugh says, he does make good choices about cigars.
 
Good for Rush. If you have the market, you can command the $$$. He definitely has the market.
 
The public schools should be turning out Democrats? :huh:

They should be? I'd think our public schools should be turning out several things, but Republicans and Democrats should be what those kids become on their own. Unless you're saying that most kids that go to public school are Democrats and most kids that go to private schools are Republicans, which I'd be interested to see.
 
They should be? I'd think our public schools should be turning out several things, but Republicans and Democrats should be what those kids become on their own. Unless you're saying that most kids that go to public school are Democrats and most kids that go to private schools are Republicans, which I'd be interested to see.

I think he was simply questioning your meaning in your original post.
 
really? 400 million for a guy that mocked a Parkinson's disease sufferer?
wow, people are weird.
 
400 Million for a guy that creates tons more than that - not weird at all, simply economics.

no, don;t ge t me wrong, this isn't a comment on him, if people that listen to him can separate the fact that he makes comments about the "elite" all the time, and the fact that he has been a hypocrite on things like drug use and other things, plus the fact that he ignorantly made fun a Parkinson's disease victim?
meh, that just means people are THAT stupid and mean, that's what I meant by "people are weird" for instance Don Imus, I don't think that he should've lost his job or sponsors, or michael savage, let the people that listen to them and nod, let those people recognize what THEY are, and let all these cats stay on the air for a long as the people want them.
 
I think he was simply questioning your meaning in your original post.

Aaaaaaahhhhh, thanks. In that case, I'm sad to be part of a country that rewards his level of mediocrity when it comes to thought. I don't begrudge him his paycheck as he very obviously earns it. This news just saddens me on a deep level for my country. Much like the success of Soulja Boy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"