They should make a mini series based on the Burton universe.

Spider-Bat

BATMAN
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
1,471
Reaction score
0
Points
31
I think it would be cool if they did a mini series where you see Keaton's Batman in stories showing you what Batman was up to in the two years before Batman Returns, he could go up against The Scarecrow, and some other villians that weren't in his movies, then maybe do a story that would show Burton's/Keaton's version of his meeting The Riddler and Two-Face.

Have it as an Allstar thing. That's what I think the "Ultimate" type Batman would be, not that Miller crap.
 
I think it would be cool if they did a mini series where you see Keaton's Batman in stories showing you what Batman was up to in the two years before Batman Returns, he could go up against The Scarecrow, and some other villians that weren't in his movies, then maybe do a story that would show Burton's/Keaton's version of his meeting The Riddler and Two-Face.

Have it as an Allstar thing. That's what I think the "Ultimate" type Batman would be, not that Miller crap.
I dunno. It's not that I didn't like his movies (I like Batman Returns a little less every time I see it, but I still don't dislike it), so much as I don't know how great a batman that just drives around and lumbers around would work for comics. I dunno that sounds like lame reasoning, it's just when I panel out scenes from those movies in my head that aren't super exciting. I could be way off. The idea just doesn't feel right to me. not that it is a BAD idea, I just don't know that I would like it.
 
I think it would be cool if they did a mini series where you see Keaton's Batman in stories showing you what Batman was up to in the two years before Batman Returns, he could go up against The Scarecrow, and some other villians that weren't in his movies, then maybe do a story that would show Burton's/Keaton's version of his meeting The Riddler and Two-Face.
Have it as an Allstar thing. That's what I think the "Ultimate" type Batman would be, not that Miller crap.
Actually, this is something I would love to see. But the point would be to have the real ideas of Tim Burton, not just ideas and designs "inspired by".
I have the 2 adapted-from-the-first-movies books. and it is my favorite batman books of all time. It is like everything that was "meh" in the movies, works here, batman acting and moving like he was in the comics of the 70es/80es but with all the dark gothic universe. :up:
Your idea is cool for me. A miniserie would be nice, but I won't hold my breath.
 
not that Miller crap.

So you hate on Frank Miller's version of Batman, yet you love Tim Burton's movie version. Frank Miller's version influenced and paved the way for Tim Burton's version. Michael Keaton said on a 2004 A&E Biography "Tim was really into the Frank Miller thing and knew it and understood it far more than I did." Danny Elfman said on the Batman special edition DVD "After Beetlejuice I got a call from Tim saying 'I'm doing this thing you might be interested in it.' He sent me the Dark Knight comics and that was much more up my alley than what I had known of the original Batman comics as a kid." Tim Burton said in the book Burton on Burton "The success of those graphic novels made our ideas more acceptable."
Sam Hamm said in the Comics Interview Super Special "The first issue of Dark Knight had just come out when I was first discussing the possibility of doing the screenplay. I went into the comics store to see what was going on in the field and I was pretty staggered! There was every reason to get excited. There is a bit of Dark Knight in the tone. There are a couple of literal swipes from Dark Knight -- the notion that he wears the emblem on his chest as a target, essentially, because he's trying to draw fire away from his head. There are a couple of other bits like that. The body armor stuff is one of the snatches from Dark Knight. When you sit down and try to work out the grit, the nuts and bolts of how the guy does what he does, you have to ask questions -- why doesn't he get shot. Frank Miller's solution seemed like the most logical one."

a batman that just drives around and lumbers around

Batman doesn't just drive around in the Tim Burton movies or lumber around.

Tim Burton himself would need to be involved contributing his ideas and concepts for it to genuinely have his versions of the Riddler and Two-Face and the Scarecrow. If Sam Hamm (Batman screenwriter, and writer of Batman: Blind Justice) or Daniel Waters (Batman Returns screenwriter) wrote it and Jerry Ordway (artist on the Batman comic book adaption) or Steve Erwin (artist on the Batman Returns comic book adaption) illustrated it then it could be awesome.
 
Last edited:
fa97p1.jpg

f2ofp5.jpg
 
Last edited:
Not to hate on the Tim Burton movies, but I'd rather see a Nolanverse mini
 
I would love to see both versions on comics.
 
lmo michael keaton's batman had the best batsuit on screen so far.
mkb.jpg

batmankeaton3.jpg


He also had the best car imo.
batmobile-tim-burton.jpg

BatmanReturnsBatmobile13.jpg
 
There was that Destroyer arc from the 90's that used Anton Furst's Gotham movie designs in which some crazed loon is blowing up Gotham's newer buildings, which according to him, have overshadowed the old Gotham & his destruction leads to art.

2936.jpg

dk27.jpg

5746.jpg
 
No tim burtons is horrible just awful who the hell likes that stuff, and micheal keaton? Are you kidding me its like watching a cardboardbox act.
 
I'd read it. It would be neat seeing that version of the bat mobile again the cast again. See redesigned Bat villians fit into that universe.
 
Tim Burton is a liar he dosent read comic books especcially not Frank Millers books. He has PR people who tell him to say this **** or they make statements for him. He states somewhere he dosent read comic books that there beneath him. Kevin Smith calls him out on it Im pretty sure.
 
It would be really random to have a burton based series come out now. I think a nolan based series would be more appropriate. Im a little upset they didn't release a graphic novel adaptation of TDK i think that would've been sick.
 
Even though a whole lot of comic tie-ins to movies end up sucking, I'd at least like to see DC try something like this. Burton's universe, Nolan's universe... hell, even a continuation of the DCAU after JLU's final episode (similar to Buffy season 8 at Dark Horse).

Really, I'd love to see a comic version of what Burton would've done in a third Bat-film.
 
Tim Burton is a liar he dosent read comic books especcially not Frank Millers books. He has PR people who tell him to say this **** or they make statements for him. He states somewhere he dosent read comic books that there beneath him. Kevin Smith calls him out on it Im pretty sure.

No, Tim Burton said "I was never a giant comic book fan, but I've always loved the image of Batman and The Joker. The reason I've never been a comic book fan - and I think it started when I was a child - is because I could never tell which box I was supposed to read. That's why I loved The Killing Joke, because for the first time I could tell which one to read. It's my favorite. It's the first comic I've ever loved."
That Tim Burton quote is from the book Burton on Burton:
batmanburton1269653670_books.png

batmanburton1269654360_books_003.jpg

And Danny Elfman said Tim sent him the Dark Knight comics and Michael Keaton said "Tim was really into the Frank Miller thing". Why would they lie? And Kevin Smith said his feud with Tim Burton was just an exaggerated joke. Kevin Smith jokingly accused Tim Burton of stealing the end of Tim Burton's Planet of the Apes from Kevin Smith's Chasing Dogma comic book and Tim Burton retorted by claiming that anyone who knows him knows that he never reads comic books, and would especially never read any by Kevin Smith. Kevin Smith says it was "just a joke". On the View Askew Web site, Smith writes, "Lest anyone think some sort of holy jihad is brewing betwixt me and the mighty Tim, I'd like to set the record straight here." After saying he enjoys Tim Burton's films "to varying degrees," he goes on to say, "No — I do not think the Planet of the Apes ending was stolen from [my comic book], nor am I thinking about taking anyone to court."
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/story?id=103026&page=1
 
whatever his people told him to say the description above is not tim burtons movie. there is nothing spycological or deep in those movies. i quote he was enamored with how some characters were animals thought it was ver UNIQUE. Burton is trash. AND THERE WAS NO TRACE NOT EVEN A HINT OF MILLER IN THOSE MOVIES. He was told miller is hot or if he read miller he simply didnt understand a thing i think he justlikes dark creepy stuff without any thought behind it.
 
whatever his people told him to say the description above is not tim burtons movie. there is nothing spycological or deep in those movies. i quote he was enamored with how some characters were animals thought it was ver UNIQUE. Burton is trash. AND THERE WAS NO TRACE NOT EVEN A HINT OF MILLER IN THOSE MOVIES. He was told miller is hot or if he read miller he simply didnt understand a thing i think he justlikes dark creepy stuff without any thought behind it.
 
whatever his people told him to say the description above is not tim burtons movie. there is nothing spycological or deep in those movies. i quote he was enamored with how some characters were animals thought it was ver UNIQUE. Burton is trash. AND THERE WAS NO TRACE NOT EVEN A HINT OF MILLER IN THOSE MOVIES. He was told miller is hot or if he read miller he simply didnt understand a thing i think he justlikes dark creepy stuff without any thought behind it.

Back it up or shut up.

Not a hint of Miller? Dark Knight Returns is the book that convinced the producers how to approach Batman as a darker character. The Dark Knight Returns was a major turning point in the myth of Batman. Therefore, The Dark Knight Returns was looked at by Tim Burton and Michael Keaton to see how to portray the character as a darker, deeper character. The Miller influence is there and has always been there. Unless you need it spoon-fed to you, learn to look past face-value and you'll see it.
 
whatever his people told him to say the description above is not tim burtons movie. there is nothing spycological or deep in those movies. i quote he was enamored with how some characters were animals thought it was ver UNIQUE. Burton is trash. AND THERE WAS NO TRACE NOT EVEN A HINT OF MILLER IN THOSE MOVIES. He was told miller is hot or if he read miller he simply didnt understand a thing i think he justlikes dark creepy stuff without any thought behind it.

There is thought behind everything in Tim Burton's Bat-films. There is nothing "spycological", but the Tim Burton Bat-films are psychological and captured the psychological profile of Batman. He has a dark, grim, obsessive nature. He certainly has childhood trauma, abandonment issues over has parents murder, he's obsessive compulsive, he's angry. His parents were murdered and he has dedicated himself to warring on crime for the rest of his life. The death of a loved one, particularly both your parents murdered right in front of you, is very painful. His war on crime prevents him from having very meaningful relationships with women so he is a lonely man in that regard as well. He has rocky relationships with women. The affection he undeniably felt for Vicki Vale, a beautiful, talented woman engaged in a socially acceptable field of endeavor (photo journalism), has been rendered all but insignificant by the infinitely more erotic allure of Catwoman, a villainess. He wears a bat costume to strike terror in criminals hearts. Bruce dresses up as a bat to create fear. The character is intrinsically a character who strikes fear and terror in his enemies. He is mysterious. That's all there in Burton's Batman films. I loved the opening scene on the roof top. I still love that scene with the two thugs on the roof. "Let's get outa here. I don't like it out here -- not after what happened to Johnny Gobbs." "Hey, Johnny Gobbs got ripped and took a walk off a roof. No big loss." "That ain't what I heard. I heard that The Bat got him." Batman shouldn't allow himself to be seen much in the comics or on film -- he should stick to the shadows. He loses a great deal of his effectiveness once criminals realize he's a man. He needs to make a bunch of thugs with guns piss in their pants. The whole point of becoming Batman is to create that edge -- he's some sort of demonic bat creature. The opening scene on the roof top in Burton's first Bat-film captured that very well. Batman needs to maintain a degree of mystery. There is fear in the unknown and Batman wants criminals to fear him. And, after all, that is what Batman tries to do by lurking in the shadows. Using exploding gas pellets to make himself appear and disappear and so on, as he does in Tim Burton's Batman film at the Chemical Plant.
With Batman Returns Tim Burton was enamored with how Batman, Catwoman and the Penguin are sort of animal people and Tim Burton used the animal motif as a strong theme for the film. Animalistic primal instincts. After all, Batman is a nocturnal "creature of the night", as Bill Finger called him, in Batman's origin in the comics he even said "I shall become a bat", and bats are nocturnal animals and Batman spends a lot of time in a cave, dresses like a bat and frightens people as bats frighten people. There are a lot of similarities between Catwoman and cats. Catwoman is nocturnal and cats are nocturnal animals and she is playful and she does whatever she wants and she is unpredictable and moody and impulsive as cats are and she of course dresses like a cat. The Penguin has a huge beak and waddles like a penguin and squawks like a penguin. "Everyone forgets that we're still basically animals," said Tim Burton.
Frank Miller's Batman material influenced Tim Burton's version. As in Miller's Batman comics, Batman is a very dark, grim, ruthless and brutal vigilante in Burton's Batman films. Batman is also a very controversial figure to Gotham citizens in Burton's Batman films, as in Miller's Batman comics. As Sam Hamm says, there are "literal swipes from Dark Knight -- the notion that he wears the emblem on his chest as a target, essentially, because he's trying to draw fire away from his head. There are a couple of other bits like that. The body armor stuff is one of the snatches from Dark Knight. When you sit down and try to work out the grit, the nuts and bolts of how the guy does what he does, you have to ask questions -- why doesn't he get shot. Frank Miller's solution seemed like the most logical one." Batman's spear gun is obviously influenced by Frank Miller's Dark Knight Returns. Even Catwoman's costume in Batman Returns, which is a full bodysuit with cat-cowl and gloves with claws on them, is essentially a black rubber version of the Catwoman costume in Frank Miller's Year One, just without the tail (the whip represented the tail in Batman Returns. It was a euphemism for her tail.), and with high-heel boots and stitching. The stitching represents her patchwork fragmentation of her character. There is thought behind everything.

Also, Frank Miller himself said when asked:
iF MAGAZINE: Did you like the Tim Burton films at all?

MILLER: I liked the first one. I liked Michael Keaton. I don’t know how much I saw of the other ones. I know I had to tune in to see Michelle Pfeiffer play Catwoman because she’s Michelle Pfeiffer and she was playing Catwoman. How many fantasies of mine can collide at the same time? I just generally didn’t like the tone of the other movies. I didn’t agree with it.
http://www.moebiusgraphics.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=400
 
Last edited:
he hit the nail on the head exept the joker part that was just jack nicholson in makeup not the joker at all
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLBvy67ofLs
just cus he made batman gloomy and dark dosent mean its like millers batman at all you dont get it millers batman is a happy maniocal gritty hyperintelligent jackass and overall a goddamn maniac. hes perfect. burtons was some emo *** who wines about bein lonely boohoo people have real problems.
 
Last edited:
No tim burtons is horrible just awful who the hell likes that stuff, and micheal keaton? Are you kidding me its like watching a cardboardbox act.

Is this what you do? Just bash everything and try to start arguments? calm down man, it's not worth getting all crazy about it.
 
nolan used real established fighting style burton did not
nolan explains why batman can just beat everyone up burton did not
nolan understood jokers nihilistic core mysterious past burton did not
nolan used an actual military legitimacy for the tech burton did not
nolan made a batman movie burton made jack nicholson vs shredder
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAmuSUuY7DA&NR=1
 
he hit the nail on the head exept the joker part that was just jack nicholson in makeup not the joker at all
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLBvy67ofLs
just cus he made batman gloomy and dark dosent mean its like millers batman at all you dont get it millers batman is a happy maniocal gritty hyperintelligent jackass and overall a goddamn maniac. hes perfect. burtons was some emo *** who wines about bein lonely boohoo people have real problems.
MB, ban this man.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"