• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Undercover Investigator Charged With Animal Cruelty for Videotaping Farm Abuse

Alex_Spider

Sidekick
Joined
Dec 3, 2005
Messages
2,527
Reaction score
0
Points
31
http://www.greenisthenewred.com/blog/colorado-cok-investigation-taylor-radig/7403/

An undercover investigator for the animal protection nonprofit Compassion Over Killing is being charged with animal cruelty for filming animal abuse of newborn calves in Colorado.

Taylor Radig worked at Quanah Cattle Co. in Kersey, Colorado, and covertly filmed calves, some so young they still had umbilical cords attached, being kicked, thrown, and slammed onto trucks. Video footage was released by the group on November 13th, and on November 15th criminal charges were filed against three men shown abusing the animals.


At the time, Sherriff John Cooke said ”We still have work to do. We want to make sure we have identified all the suspects and all the parties to determine if we need to make other arrests.”


Today the Sherriff’s department announced additional charges were filed against the young woman who filmed the abuse and turned over the footage to the police.



In a press release, the police admit as much: “The video footage was eventually provided to law enforcement by representatives of Compassion Over Killing approximately 2 months after Radig’s employment ended with Quanah Cattle Company… Radig’s failure to report the alleged abuse of the animals in a timely manner adheres to the definition of acting with negligence and substantiates the charge Animal Cruelty.” Radig is also accused of participating in the abuse.


Compassion Over Killing said in a statement that the prosecution is retaliatory: “The charge against our investigator is unsupported by the law and it reeks of political motivation fueled by an agribusiness industry that is once again lashing out in desperation to stop undercover investigators from exposing the truth.”


The prosecution of a whistleblower who exposed animal cruelty in this way is unprecedented.


However, the agriculture industry has been campaigning heavily for “ag-gag” laws that would make it illegal to photograph or videotape animal abuse on factory farms. In Utah, the first ag-gag prosecution was against a woman who filmed a slaughterhouse from the public street.

The latest versions of these bills require investigators to turn over video footage to law enforcement immediately, and some of them would prohibit investigators from speaking with the press.


These so-called “mandatory reporting” requirements — which are strikingly similar to what is at issue in this case — are intended to stop national animal welfare groups from documenting patterns of abuse. Such legislation was introduced in New Hampshire, Nebraska, Wyoming, Tennessee, California, and North Carolina this year — and failed in every state.


Colorado is not an “ag-gag” state, but this is clearly part of that trend, and could indicate ag-gag legislation about to be introduced in Colorado.
Prosecuting animal welfare advocates for exposing animal cruelty is clearly an attempt by Big Ag to send a chilling message to anyone who not only records abuse, but comes forward and turns over that footage to the police.
No matter what bill or intimidation acts are staged by the authority in conjuction with the meat industry, people will still keep filming and exposing the horrors that take place in sloughter farms and even risk setting animals free and get arrested in the proccess. The fire rises...:word:
 
Last edited:
That's like charging someone with video evidence of a murder with committing it themselves.
 
That's like charging someone with video evidence of a murder with committing it themselves.

lol yeah, it is totally absurd. But that is to be excpected. Their goal is to prevent other people filming similar events, out of fear of getting arrested. Sadly, profit is more important that truth and justice in our society.
 
Last edited:
That's like charging someone with video evidence of a murder with committing it themselves.

If you wait months to give it to police they may charge you with waiting months to turn over evidence.
 
It would be nice if society rewarded whistleblowers who expose flaws in our world that need to be fixed.

But we typically treat them like criminals who snitched on more successful criminals.

"You want to stop animal cruelty? Yo, snitches get stitches". smh
 
If you wait months to give it to police they may charge you with waiting months to turn over evidence.

Yet if a woman falsely accuses a man of rape and admits it years later, many prosecutors won't press charges against her because they want to encourage other woman to feel fee to come forward.

I think such a policy makes alot more sense when applied to late whistleblowers. All this does is discourage whistleblowers from exposing wrongdoing and they already have a long list of reasons to stay silent.
 
It would be nice if society rewarded whistleblowers who expose flaws in our world that need to be fixed.

But we typically treat them like criminals who snitched on more successful criminals.

"You want to stop animal cruelty? Yo, snitches get stitches". smh

Unfortunately, society knows about animal cruelty, but it is never gonna stop as long as there is supply and demand. The abuse against the baby calves and their dumping after, that the article mentions, is a common practice in all sloughter houses. Male calves do not not produce milk, nor they can forcibly be impregnated artificially like they do repeatedly in female cows, so they kill them at the moment they are born, for economical reasons.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"