Underwear or Skirt in the WW movie?

kpjoon

Civilian
Joined
May 8, 2002
Messages
485
Reaction score
0
Points
11
Which one do you prefer?
Honestly, I think a miniskirt will translate better onto film rather than the underwear.
 
If it were up to me, it'd be a thong. I hope they go with underwear, or whatever it's called.
 
boyshorts: theyre sexy, but not thong ****ty. provides coverage but not like the old school granny panties. maybe something like this in blue leather/vinyl

boyshorts45st.jpg
 
This thing will be PG-13 at the most, which equates to a lot of family viewers, and I doubt they would want to lose that cash cow by having her in a g-string. The boy shorts thing would probably be the choice.
 
so, are we only going to get one or the other, cuase if were not geting both, i'd go with the skirt, if you know what I mean lol
commando's the only way to go hehehe
 
A thong would be nice :)
 
i like to have the battle skirt (like the ancient Greeks/Romans) with star studs and the star-spangled panties underneath.
 
Steelsheen said:
i like to have the battle skirt (like the ancient Greeks/Romans) with star studs and the star-spangled panties underneath.
Yeah, I think that will be the direction they are aiming for.
 
Neither.
I say cover her legs. She's supposed to be the symbol of female empowerment, not eye candy. Let's give her more than a frickin' bikini!
 
Steelsheen said:
i like to have the battle skirt (like the ancient Greeks/Romans) with star studs and the star-spangled panties underneath.
I would prefer something like this.
 
Soundwave88 said:
that it would be but depends whos wearing it


a girl naturally :O
 
Chris Wallace said:
Neither.
I say cover her legs. She's supposed to be the symbol of female empowerment, not eye candy. Let's give her more than a frickin' bikini!

so you're saying empowered females cant be sexy? besides, the battle skirt look is what the greeks and romans used to wear to battle, so it's not like there's no reason for it...
 
Skirt. And I'd like it to be like that Roman/Greek-esque battle suit she was wearing for awhile...and which the new Wonder Woman wears. At least I think she does if I recall correctly. You know, individual strips made of leather I'm assuming making up the skirt.
 
The Joker said:
so you're saying empowered females cant be sexy? besides, the battle skirt look is what the greeks and romans used to wear to battle, so it's not like there's no reason for it...
No, I am not saying empowered women can't be sexy. However, a woman can be sexy WITHOUT showing 2/3 of her skin.
And unless the movie takes place in either Ancient Greece or Ancient Rome, their battle attire is kind of moot here.
 
Not really because Wonder Woman has always had a Greek theme to it and has been set in modern day.
 
Chris Wallace said:
Neither.
I say cover her legs. She's supposed to be the symbol of female empowerment, not eye candy. Let's give her more than a frickin' bikini!

***heart attack***

Thats definitely not her iconic look. When you have an iconic costume like hers, doing something like that jacks it up way too much.
 
Whatever the most revealing costume is- I choose that.
 
I suppose underwear and a skirt. It's supposed to be at least a PG13 movie right? :D
 
I want the star-spangled underwear.

Although, if you want to be technical, it would probably be more practical for Wonder Woman to wear that heavy duty Roman gladiator armor when fighting the forces of evil as opposed to the metallic bikini - more protection for her, 'cause you can never have enough no matter how much stamina you have naturally.
 
As long as they stay away from the Golden Age trunks and keep from making it look like she's a Xena look alike, I really don't care.
 
^They can't help but make her a Xena lookalike, as Xena was basically modeled after her from the get go.
 
"Underwear." Wonder Woman's look is iconic, and changing it will only annoy the masses of casual moviegoers who already have an image in their heads of the way the character is supposed to look. Letting her show her beautiful legs is NOT inherently sexist, but covering them up WILL lose sexist and/or horny male viewers (who pay money just like everyone else). The Xena skirt would be detrimental, and would probably cause a lot of jokes or accusations of "rip off." WW is a comic icon, and should not be modeled after a syndicated TV show that was popular a decade ago.

Honestly, NO ONE I know of in real life has a problem with the way WW looks. The only people who complain are a small minority of fanboys on forums like this, who think that their personal beefs and/or wishes for costume changes are what a lot of other people would prefer. Ironic, since no fanboy would call for major changes to Superman or Batman's costumes.

Some of these guys claim that audiences wouldn't take the character seriously if she wears her famous costume, even though you NEVER hear any normal people making fun of it (not even in a light-hearted Superman "underwear on the outside" way while still being accepting of it). If anything, the iconic costume is visually APPEALING. It's beautiful, colorful, and can be sexy without being overly ****ty. Since when did something no more revealing than a ONE PIECE bathing suit become too sexist and revealing again? What decade are we living in?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"