• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

We need another terrorist attack

so it's not Bush's fault if we get attacked, but it was definitely Clinton's fault when we did?:huh:

oh, right. Bush's conservative. He can do no wrong.:o

Actually, my entire point is, and has always been, you can't point to any one man and place blame.

Problem is you can't tell that to a flaming liberal, who will blame Bush for everything past, present and future. The second someone reasoned comes along and says, umm, duh, you have a terrible memory, they are made 'the enemy'.
 
Actually, my entire point is, and has always been, you can't point to any one man and place blame.

Problem is you can't tell that to a flaming liberal, who will blame Bush for everything past, present and future. The second someone reasoned comes along and says, umm, duh, you have a terrible memory, they are made 'the enemy'.

So he doesn't deserve o have all fingers pointed at him when something bad happens, but he does deserve praise when bad things don't happen?

However, I agree with your point. It isn't entirely the President fault. He shares blame with his administration, the FBI, the CIA, etc. Maybe if Bush didn't appear so corrupt and incompetent so often he wouldn't get crapped on as much by the flaming liberals.
 
So he doesn't deserve o have all fingers pointed at him when something bad happens, but he does deserve praise when bad things don't happen?

However, I agree with your point. It isn't entirely the President fault. He shares blame with his administration, the FBI, the CIA, etc. Maybe if Bush didn't appear so corrupt and incompetent so often he wouldn't get crapped on as much by the flaming liberals.

I think had he not went into the war with guns blazing without giving talk a chance he wouldn't get as much heat as he does. He can'teven connect Iraq with Al queda.
 
Why did he even stop looking for Bin Laden?
 
Totally inappropriate choice of words.

About the article, if Bush cant get approval from ways other then Americans seeing their innocent brethren dying..then maybe he shouldnt be president anyway.
 
You mean like the attack on the WTC that happened during Clinton's term, or the attack on the USS Cole? Do you forget that 9/11 was planned during Clinton's term?

Oh, my bad, Clinton's a liberal - he can do no wrong :rolleyes:.
:huh:

Lulled who?
nothing has happened?

uh....haven't thousands of people died overseas?
haven't hundreds of people had their rights trampled?
... I.....I mean, what world do you live in?
terrorist plots were being foiled BEFORE 9-11 in case you have conveniently forgot about the Millenium terror attacks ( all foiled by the way) well. maybe you forgot, you know why?

because the Clinton admin/ fought the war on Terror IN SILENCE. as it should be run.


jesus ,dude, grow a brain.

:huh::huh::huh::huh:
 
beveryafraid.jpg
 
LOL...I'll admit that's funny.

But that guy used a poor choice of words. I think I understood the jist. Basically Bush has become a victim of his own success in this area. The fact that nothing has happen in 5 to 6 years has lulled many of you back to sleep. Heck, it's got that "empty-suit", John Edwards actually saying there is no war on terror!!
giveup.gif
banghead.gif
He says this while a ..."coff" (clearing throat) terror plot is foiled at JFK Airport!!!
You're kidding right? JFK terror plot? You mean the JFK terror plot by the homeless drug addicts that had a snowballs chance in hell of ever working?

You're as dumb as the guy in the article.:whatever:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"