I'm in Athens, and some guys I know are freaking out to beat the band. OMG the virus is only 70 miles away!!!
They think that's bad? I heard viruses can travel through the internet!![]()
Well the media sure does the best it can to fan the ERMAGHERD WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!!1111 flames.
So if the CDC and Medical experts think that there won't be an outbreak, why are people still panicking?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/07/rick-wiles-ebola_n_5658481.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular
"Yeah, that virus is terrible and all, but if it kills some dudes that wanna get married or women getting abortions, maybe it's not so bad."
![]()
A lot of this is the desire to believe in conspiracy theories, that there is some greater power behind the curtains manipulating events and information to some vague and undetailed outcome.Because antivax, climate change deniers, birthers and creationism. The public has a shameful percentage of folk who think they're much more expert on science matters than scientists. And they're prone to panic and incite panicking.
I only have two comments.
1) Wiles wouldn't know what a Christian was if it bit him on the ass. People like this are the worst kind of fraud. They're not Christian, and IMO, they know perfectly well that they're not Christian. But they've found a bread and butter portraying themselves as such to drum up fear from the panicky gullible masses who send them their life savings. The 700 Club and its ilk are professional con men, nothing more and nothing less.
2) Does he think Ebola is going to pick and choose "sinful" people and spare righteous folks?
A panel of ethicists convened by the World Health Organisation will weigh whether drugs that haven't been widely tested for safety should be used in an outbreak in which about 40 per cent of infected people survive with just supportive care. If so, the panel members must address who gets the medicines, which so far only exist in small amounts.
"This is the first effort to have a long overdue, transparent, public discussion about how to distribute life-saving medicines in an emergency," said Arthur Caplan, a director of a medical ethics division at New York University. "A ton of attention is going to follow this panel."
Yeah, that's the thing that gets me. Like if a hetero family man is within infecting distance, its just going to hop, skip or jump right over him and immediately head for the nearest gay? Like, what, did the virus download the Grindr app ahead of time?![]()
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/07/rick-wiles-ebola_n_5658481.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular
"Yeah, that virus is terrible and all, but if it kills some dudes that wanna get married or women getting abortions, maybe it's not so bad."
![]()
I feel like a lot of those comments are just trolls that really don't believe it.
The other one was also. Apparently they're ebola free? If so, this is gonna rattle a lot of cages if it was that simple to eradicate.
It's not that simple to eradicate. If it were it would have been done decades ago. The drugs they used require sophisticated and complex genetic engineering and treatments. This kind of thing wasn't possible before and it might not be 100% effective. It might not even be 50% effective. There have been two people treated so far, that's barely enough to say it works at all.The other one was also. Apparently they're ebola free? If so, this is gonna rattle a lot of cages if it was that simple to eradicate.
The other one was also. Apparently they're ebola free? If so, this is gonna rattle a lot of cages if it was that simple to eradicate.