Mach2Infinity
You Are Soul
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2007
- Messages
- 496
- Reaction score
- 53
- Points
- 53
I've decided to post this in the Politics section because invariably this does cover identity politics and representation/diversity in the arts/entertainment world and who should be cast for which roles.. I imagine at least some posters here are aware of the controversy over Bryan Cranston being cast as a quadriplegic character in the film The Upside rather than a disabled actor - often referred to as 'cripping up'.
This BBC article covers this story and related stories about actors facing backlash for taking on roles that they were deemed 'unsuitable' for. Adam Pearson a UK based actor/journalist/researcher has been quite vocal about this on social media and the mainstream media and you can see his argument in this Guardian video.
Adam has been in the UK media prominently last year, particularly over the casting of Charlie Heaton as Joseph Merrick (The Elephant Man) as he wasn't even approached for the role.I have a few disagreements with Adam over this issue. Particularly his position on whether he believes non-disabled actors should play disabled characters despite what he's says. I don't buy cripping up as being equal to blackface because the former is done with respect and portrays an aspect of a character whilst the latter is rooted in racism and caricature. But I respect him immensely for his convictions, experience and activism for disability rights and issues. He does have a point when it comes to how the audition/casting process seemingly shuts out potentially suitable disabled actors for perceived commercial reasons. And I do believe that better representation is needed and that there's a need for greater involvement in the casting and writing process as much as in front of the camera. I just don't favour the inevitable 'solutions' proposed which is a quota system and eventual typecasting.
Do you think that representation should take precedence over 'artistic freedom'? If mostly 'able-bodied' actors play disabled characters, does this take away the precious few opportunities awarded to disabled actors? What solutions are there?
This BBC article covers this story and related stories about actors facing backlash for taking on roles that they were deemed 'unsuitable' for. Adam Pearson a UK based actor/journalist/researcher has been quite vocal about this on social media and the mainstream media and you can see his argument in this Guardian video.
Adam has been in the UK media prominently last year, particularly over the casting of Charlie Heaton as Joseph Merrick (The Elephant Man) as he wasn't even approached for the role.I have a few disagreements with Adam over this issue. Particularly his position on whether he believes non-disabled actors should play disabled characters despite what he's says. I don't buy cripping up as being equal to blackface because the former is done with respect and portrays an aspect of a character whilst the latter is rooted in racism and caricature. But I respect him immensely for his convictions, experience and activism for disability rights and issues. He does have a point when it comes to how the audition/casting process seemingly shuts out potentially suitable disabled actors for perceived commercial reasons. And I do believe that better representation is needed and that there's a need for greater involvement in the casting and writing process as much as in front of the camera. I just don't favour the inevitable 'solutions' proposed which is a quota system and eventual typecasting.
Do you think that representation should take precedence over 'artistic freedom'? If mostly 'able-bodied' actors play disabled characters, does this take away the precious few opportunities awarded to disabled actors? What solutions are there?