- Joined
- Jul 23, 2004
- Messages
- 70,163
- Reaction score
- 199
- Points
- 73
Well he said, "You college students are going to reap what you sowed" but they are the ones benefiting, so...?
I'm surprised you've chosen not to have health insurance if you could afford it. I never could afford it, so it wasn't really a choice with me.
Also how is it saving the state money if they turn down federal funding? The law still requires their state to have a comparable healthcare system that covers the same people, except it will have to be funded out of the state budget now instead of the federal. The federal budget was going to pay 100% for three years, and then 95% and then 90% in the future. So instead these governors are saying, "No, we want to pay 100% forever". It's just playing politics to garner votes and ultimately costing many of the citizens in these particular states more money in state taxes to cover the state healthcare system they come up with.
It'd be one thing if it was, say, California, rejecting the federal to create a state system, but you are seeing this mostly in states where a huge swathe of the population are the ones the law was created to cover! So now the few rich citizens of those states will foot the bill instead of the rich citizens of other states where there are more rich people. It's just playing politics at the cost of their own state citizens.
Many college students choose not to have health care, if they are healthy, and benefit from the low cost campus clinics provide, then why not? My money was able to go to other things, and it kept my mother from being burdened with the cost of a full health care plan for me.
I am not one that was against major health care reform. But, the way this one was passed, no debate on the floor of the house or senate, backroom deals, blue dog democrats thrown under the bus, and HUGE SWEEPING LEGISLATION, that could have actually been done in steps and would not have made such huge waves that we are now seeing...IMO, this could have been done much differently. In order to take care of 15% of the US population, we did not need to change the direction of the other 85% and their health care. Just did not need to happen in order to help that group of people....