DarkKnight88
Avenger
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2002
- Messages
- 12,982
- Reaction score
- 12,110
- Points
- 103
Some of that cast ain’t cheap either.
It made like $20 million but these sites are acting like it’s a success?
I'm kinda curious on the Blackberry flick, and one reason is that it felt mostly like an American thing that never got big in, say European countries. Still I personally always found it as a quite fascinating cell phone, but somehow it never got a real market over here.As much as I dug this, I thought Blackberry is so far the best movie based on a product this year. It's also funnier.
I haven't watched Blackberry yet but I could see it being more intriguing because it's based around a product that ultimately didn't last. With Air a lot of the suspense is gone because you could probably go to a remote tribe in the Amazon rainforest and someone there would probably recognize the Air Jordan logo.As much as I dug this, I thought Blackberry is so far the best movie based on a product this year. It's also funnier.
After a certain point it passed the level of Stranger Things and got to Vice City levels of critical mass. Amazon clearly has "f you" money when it comes to licensing music.Also, the 80s music was overkill. We get it. It was in the 80s. You didn’t have to play every top 40 hit.
As great as this was, I can definitely say that I enjoyed Tetris more, but I consider both films to be really top notch so it's not like I have anything to complain about either and I definitely want to check out Blackberry too.
I've been hearing a lot of good things about that one.
Main problem with Blackberry is the whitewashing of the man who Taron Egerton plays.
Sorry, I meant Tetris. Freudian slip.Ummm I think you mean Tetris, haha.
And yeah, I do agree with you there. But Taron is so good in the movie that it almost makes me forgive them for it. Almost.