Amazing UFO footage:

[Johnichi Chiba]

That's sooo fake.

 

[Hollow Wood Director]

What bothers me about "paranormal / unexplained usually hoax" footage is that the camera operator and the people accompanying them don't have any good reason to be shooting bland vistas or uneventful areas of sky. People normally film each other in front of familiar places or doing some kind of activity they want to remember and look back on etc. I think it's pretty convenient the guy shooting this footage happened to have his camera turned on at the right time and pointing it in the right direction so we could see the UFO's entrance and exit.

I'd like to see more of the footage, in fact all of the original camcorder video tape footage not just a little snippet or a second generation copy and then we'd see what he was filming before hand and after, and then you could at least rule out CGI effects which would leave us with 3 outcomes...in camera effects ( flying models ) these things are real ( military / alien ) or nothing at all they aren't on the original video tape footage.

I bet the person who filmed this will never submit his original footage to a laboratory for analysis.

 

[Jack Rabbit]

Yeah, fake.

 

[EdRyder]

Wasnt there a Mass sighting In Phoenix AZ around 96-97?
Seen by dozens of people and captured by multiple cameras...
There was another incident more recent,I believe it was in Mexico

The Mass type sightings are interesting.Still doesnt make it "aliens" ,but interesting none the less

 

[keith_v]

I'll admit, I think this looks real. Almost too real. I have a feeling this is probably digital, but it looks better than most digital effects in movies. My guess though, is that it's for some viral marketing campaigne. Maybe for Halo or another sci-fi game.

 

[Majik1387]

I'll admit, I think this looks real. Almost too real. I have a feeling this is probably digital, but it looks better than most digital effects in movies. My guess though, is that it's for some viral marketing campaigne. Maybe for Halo or another sci-fi game.

Ahem.

IT'S CLOVERFIELD VIRAL MARKETING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Vilya]

I think it's a very good CGI job UFO's don't look like that.

 

[Jspider13]

good call.

 

[Carcharodon]

I think it's a very good CGI job UFO's don't look like that.

How many have you seen?

 

[Vilya]

^The footage is too clean, and the ships look too star-wars and star-trek to me.

 

[Carcharodon]

^The footage is too clean, and the ships look too star-wars and star-trek to me.

Who's to say that wouldn't work from a practical standpoint?

Then again, the circular ships don't look too aerodynamic. For a craft to move that quickly through our atmosphere, they would have to be at least moderately aerodynamic.

 

[EdRyder]

"Then again, the circular ships don't look too aerodynamic. For a craft to move that quickly through our atmosphere, they would have to be at least moderately aerodynamic "

t: You just explained the crash at Roswell

 

[Kevin Roegele]

Great work by whoever put together this video, but they could have designed spaceships that were a little less stereotypical.

 

[doc ock rules!]

If that was real, it would be on world news, breaking news!!!

it would be all over the press, every top newspaper in the world.

Perhaps. The sightings at O'Hare were the last to be reported in the news (a few months ago). I got to see it on CNN before it got pulled (Hearing "UFO" on there is so strange.). t:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/classified/automotive/columnists/chi-0701010141jan01,0,5874175.column
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhqJZ47mf24

I don't know if even a margin of people who watch the news/read news articles saw this.

I'm not one to trust mainstream media entirely and stories like this (labeled "crazy" by several people) will probably tend to slip through the cracks (Or be covered up if you believe in that. Don't see the reason for cover-ups, but I can see why stations don't -can't- report all the news and how that can shape people's viewpoints.).

 

[SalaciousVC]

fake,

 

[Apollo]

i want to believe it, i really want to

 

[I-T-B]

That CGI expert doesn't seem very expert, you could do this fairly easily, but it would take time. Easy enough to track with motion tracking software, sme of which (like Icarus) is free, or you could even hand track it, the video's not that shaky. For the 3D, you could either use a program such as Maya or 3DS Max, whatever, or you could download Anim8or or Blender, again, free. As for the masking, fairly easy to do in After Effects or even photoshop, especially against that sky. It would definitely take some time, but it could be done easily, and for little to no money. The second one would be a little more difficult, but still doable. As much as I'd love to believe that they are real, I think they're probably fake.

 

[the_ultimate_evil]

the sad fact is with the level of special effects and technology available to us, if any form of supernatural event, be they ghosts, aliens, monsters etc. is caught on film, very few will believe it actually happened

 

[dark_b]

you can buy a good computer a good software and then you can make this at home. thats the problem with stuff today.

i watched this month a doc. they also talked on larry king about this. more then 100 people saw something big flying above them.how can you explain this?
there is no way that this was build on earth.

 

[the_ultimate_evil]

What bothers me about "paranormal / unexplained usually hoax" footage is that the camera operator and the people accompanying them don't have any good reason to be shooting bland vistas or uneventful areas of sky. People normally film each other in front of familiar places or doing some kind of activity they want to remember and look back on etc. I think it's pretty convenient the guy shooting this footage happened to have his camera turned on at the right time and pointing it in the right direction so we could see the UFO's entrance and exit.

I'd like to see more of the footage, in fact all of the original camcorder video tape footage not just a little snippet or a second generation copy and then we'd see what he was filming before hand and after, and then you could at least rule out CGI effects which would leave us with 3 outcomes...in camera effects ( flying models ) these things are real ( military / alien ) or nothing at all they aren't on the original video tape footage.

I bet the person who filmed this will never submit his original footage to a laboratory for analysis.

speaking of strange occurrences, HOLT S**T

 

[Apollo]

if only this was realeased back in the 80's

 

[The Original Bamfer]

That is some crazy ****, man.

 

[doc ock rules!]

you can buy a good computer a good software and then you can make this at home. thats the problem with CGI.

i watched this month the doc. they also talked on larry king about this. more then 10 peopel saw something big flying above them.-how can you explain this?
there is no way that this was build on earth.

I think O'Hare was one of the more interesting ones. It made it to mainstream news, there were ten witnesses, and I believe one person even got footage of it on their cell phone (The most I can find right now is this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Bt1KeOl3hw ). I would've like to have heard more about the investigation the FFA did and what sort of weather anomaly this was supposed to be, plus more from the conspiracy theorists (I don't pay much attention to UFOs usually, but still interesting.).

 

[FaT_tONle]

The thing that really gives it away is that you see a cluster of them together will all those light specs... that's how I could tell it was faker than Pam's ****...

 

[Untilteld]

wouldn't the government grab ahold of this footage before it'd be released on the internet?