I love it of course, but I don't understand the love for the tranformation.
It was wild for the time, pretty embarrassing now.
A huge reason that CGI is so superior to practical stuff of the 80's (When it's done well...WHEN IT'S DONE WELL...I know there's way more crap CGI in the world than breath-taking CGI.......however, there was a lot more crap latex/animatronics/bladder work in the 80's than the really good stuff)
Is that a creature has to be stationary, to accomodate the butt-load of wires and team of technicians/puppeteers.
That's what ruins it for me. If your hand started stretching out an extra foot long, you would not sit there holding it in front of your face and making a spooked face. I hate how there always either had to be obvious, jerky animation, or a big hole in the floor and a creature plopped down right there for every shot.
This mantra about "wow, the old rubber stuff looks more real than CGI." is absurd.
Watch Meet Joe Black. Now, imagine the car accident part, only instead, done with a dummy.
, or scenes where a live person is talking WHILE they're head gets blown off or sheared in half.
In the 80's there was always the very clear part where the victim/changing person went from a person to a static dummy with tubing inside. It's much better now. (WHEN DONE WELL. I'm not talking about the dinosaurs in King Kong or Van Helsing)
And sorry, Gollum would've sucked ass if he'd been a thin man in a scuba suit with a mask on that can flare it's nostrils and raise it's eyebrows occasionally.